On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 08:14:16PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
Hi Marc,
Is there a reason why conditional includes (sinclude/-include) aren't
enabled in OpenBSD?
I'm asking because the Xorg people now use it in one of the xserver
Makefile. We could of course try to convince them to
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 09:25:51AM +0200, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 08:14:16PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
Hi Marc,
Is there a reason why conditional includes (sinclude/-include) aren't
enabled in OpenBSD?
I'm asking because the Xorg people now use it in one of
Hi Ingo,
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 02:24:27AM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
Hi Philip,
Philip Guenther wrote on Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 04:38:09PM -0700:
Maybe we just fix getent(1) to return an error like it does for ethers?
Whatever we do with gethostent(3) - maybe it's really expendable,
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 09:25:51 +0200
From: Matthieu Herrb matth...@herrb.eu
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 08:14:16PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
Hi Marc,
Is there a reason why conditional includes (sinclude/-include) aren't
enabled in OpenBSD?
I'm asking because the Xorg people now
You can get rid of sethostent(3)/endhostent(3) at the same time.
Those have to remain stubs for a while longer, because there are
ports which poke at them.
Hi Theo,
Theo de Raadt wrote on Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 07:35:06AM -0600:
Florian Obser wrote:
You can get rid of sethostent(3)/endhostent(3) at the same time.
Those have to remain stubs for a while longer, because there are
ports which poke at them.
Oh the joys of terseness. Florian meant
After submitting a print job and then turning on my USB printer I got:
ulpt0 at uhub0 port 1 configuration 1 interface 0 Hewlett-Packard HP LaserJet
1020 rev 2.00/1.00 addr 2
ulpt0: using bi-directional mode
ulpt0: ucode upload error=IOERROR!
ulpt0: could not load firmware 'ulpt-hp1020'
Hallo everyone, i want install OpenBSD into pocket pc phone htc tytn
hermes 300, but i don´t find the good information for unlock the
bootloader and info for firmware free fot this hardware.
http://microcontrollershop.com/product_info.php?products_id=3945 this is
the mainboard
the cpu is
spotted a small typo in a comment. 1Gpbs - 1Gbps
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 09:53:28PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
This seems to be enough to help em(4) in modern laptops like the X240 to
no longer generate watchdog timeouts on high throughput.
This should only affect I218 but tests on different
Patches are now available to fix two remotely triggerable memory leaks
in the OpenSSL libssl library. This issue affects 5.4 and 5.5. These
issues were originally fixed in forthcoming 5.6 release (it's not
affected).
The patch for 5.5 follows.
untrusted comment: signature from openbsd 5.5 base
everything else in crypto is protected at IPL_VM (via splvm), i
cant see a reason for the taskq to be different. ive read all the
users of the crypto api and theyre all at or below IPL_VM.
can someone test this with ipsec or softraid crypto?
cheers,
dlg
Index: crypto.c
ok?
Index: crypto.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/crypto/crypto.c,v
retrieving revision 1.67
diff -u -p -r1.67 crypto.c
--- crypto.c14 Sep 2014 14:17:23 - 1.67
+++ crypto.c20 Oct 2014 00:26:56 -
@@ -220,15 +220,12
pools lock themselves, we just gotta tell them how hard.
can someone test this with ipsec or softraid crypto? or ok it?
Index: crypto.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/crypto/crypto.c,v
retrieving revision 1.68
diff -u -p -r1.68 crypto.c
the distinct impression i get is crypto_invoke is an internal
abstraction to src/sys/crypto/crypto.c. it isnt documented in
crypto(9), and is only used outside crypto by softraid. softraid
should be calling crypto_dispatch with CRYPTO_F_NOQUEUE set if it
wants/needs those semantics.
can a
14 matches
Mail list logo
