On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 09:51:59AM -0400, Matt Schwartz wrote:
> Hi tech@,
>
> One small correction to relayd.conf(5). In the examples section for
> TLS acceleration, the configuration option match hash "sessid" results
> in a syntax error. Diff below.
>
> Thanks,
> Matt
>
fixed, thanks.
jmc
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 12:32:25AM +0300, IL Ka wrote:
> See:
> https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-bugs=152380023916176=2
>
>
> diff --git usr.sbin/config/config.8 usr.sbin/config/config.8
> index 748aaab7a..10fdf7b92 100644
> --- usr.sbin/config/config.8
> +++ usr.sbin/config/config.8
> @@ -341,6
Hi,
switchd(8) sends packet_outs with OFP_PORT_ANY as the dstport, causing
switches receiving them to disconnect due to validation failure of the said
message. The comments indicate that looping packets should be ignored, which I
agree is the expected behavior for a controller implementing a
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 12:13:10AM +0300, IL Ka wrote:
> Links to appropriate man pages added
>
this doesn;t apply cleanly, so i'll comment: i'm ok with adding the
links. still, we have a mix of
See blah(x) for details.
and
See blah(x).
i think less is more here, so maybe you
Hi,
There seems to be a typo in vmd.c:
Index: vmd.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/vmd/vmd.c,v
retrieving revision 1.82
diff -u -p -u -p -r1.82 vmd.c
--- vmd.c 29 Mar 2018 18:29:24 - 1.82
+++ vmd.c 20 Apr 2018
On 2018-04-20, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> At some point I tried playing with this on the APU, which has the v3
> engine I think. Couldn't get anything to work (but I didn't try very
> hard). Would be interesting to see whether this actually works on
> that machine.
It
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 09:56:58PM +0200, llgx...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There seems to be a typo in vmd.c:
>
> Index: vmd.c
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/vmd/vmd.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.82
> diff -u -p -u -p -r1.82
Hi tech@,
FYI, thanks!
Index: resource.h
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/sys/resource.h,v
retrieving revision 1.14
diff -u -p -r1.14 resource.h
--- resource.h 25 Oct 2013 04:42:48 - 1.14
+++ resource.h 20 Apr 2018 08:43:10
I don't think these are "redundant quotes" but rather ditto marks:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ditto_mark
this is quite clear here, for example:
> u_int64_t p_uru_nvcsw; /* LONG: voluntary context switches. */
> - u_int64_t p_uru_nivcsw; /* LONG: involuntary ". */
>
Hi tech@,
FYI, thanks!
Index: time.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/time/time.c,v
retrieving revision 1.25
diff -u -p -r1.25 time.c
--- time.c 21 Aug 2017 13:38:02 - 1.25
+++ time.c 20 Apr 2018 09:21:59 -
@@
Hi Theo,
I am very sorry for this wrong modification!
Thanks!
Best Regards
Nan Xiao
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 4:57 PM, Theo Buehler wrote:
> I don't think these are "redundant quotes" but rather ditto marks:
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ditto_mark
>
> this is quite clear
Hi,
Jimmy Hess wrote on Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 06:53:44AM -0500:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 3:57 AM, Theo Buehler wrote:
>> I don't think these are "redundant quotes" but rather ditto marks:
> The ditto mark and the quote character are not the same character,
> and the
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 3:57 AM, Theo Buehler wrote:
> I don't think these are "redundant quotes" but rather ditto marks:
The ditto mark and the quote character are not the same character,
and the comments are nonsensical since they used the wrong character.
If the writer
Hi,
Nan Xiao wrote on Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 05:28:01PM +0800:
> FYI, thanks!
No. Read the manual page and /sys/kern/kern_time.c :
With a valid clock id and a valid address, this function
cannot fail, so you are just adding dead code. Worse,
you are making future auditors wonder what the heck
On 18/04/18(Wed) 12:06, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 16/04/18(Mon) 12:33, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > Diff below is a rewrite/cleanup of fdcopy() to avoid using memcpy().
> >
> > The problem with the memcpys is that they introduce a window where
> > some 'struct file *' are duplicated without being
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 06:53:44AM -0500, Jimmy Hess wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 3:57 AM, Theo Buehler wrote:
> > I don't think these are "redundant quotes" but rather ditto marks:
>
> The ditto mark and the quote character are not the same character,
> and the comments
On 20/04/18 16:20, Remi Locherer wrote:
> On 2018-04-20 14:46, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
>> While it does the job for local connected/static networks (on the router),
>> it doesn't do it for forwarded routes which I learn from remote OSPF routers.
>
> LSAs from other routers are not changed by
Hi Ingo,
> No. Read the manual page and /sys/kern/kern_time.c :
>
> With a valid clock id and a valid address, this function
> cannot fail, so you are just adding dead code. Worse,
> you are making future auditors wonder what the heck is
> going on here.
Sorry, I can't find the above words
On 2018-04-20 14:46, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
On 04/02/18 01:42, Remi Locherer wrote:
Hi
This adds a new feature to ospfd: depend on interface.
A ospfd.conf using it looks like this:
--%<--
redistribute default depend on carp0
area 0.0.0.0 {
interface em2 { depend on carp0 }
On 04/02/18 01:42, Remi Locherer wrote:
> Hi
>
> This adds a new feature to ospfd: depend on interface.
>
> A ospfd.conf using it looks like this:
>
> --%<--
> redistribute default depend on carp0
> area 0.0.0.0 {
> interface em2 { depend on carp0 }
> [...]
> }
> --%<--
>
> This
sorry setup is different:
- [OB1]- [Cisco_ext_1] ---
[Cisco_int] --| |--- [BGP router]
- [OB2]- [Cisco_ext2_ ]---
G
Hi,
Nan Xiao wrote on Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 10:11:55PM +0800:
> Ingo Schwarze wrote:
>> No. Read the manual page and /sys/kern/kern_time.c :
>>
>> With a valid clock id and a valid address, this function
>> cannot fail, so you are just adding dead code. Worse,
>> you are making future auditors
On 2018-04-20 15:39, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
On 20/04/18 16:20, Remi Locherer wrote:
On 2018-04-20 14:46, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
While it does the job for local connected/static networks (on the
router),
it doesn't do it for forwarded routes which I learn from remote OSPF
routers.
Jimmy Hess wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 3:57 AM, Theo Buehler wrote:
> > I don't think these are "redundant quotes" but rather ditto marks:
>
> The ditto mark and the quote character are not the same character,
> and the comments are nonsensical since
24 matches
Mail list logo