anyone?
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 10:17:31PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed a missing checksum count in netstat tcp packets sent
> software-checksummed. Turns out that our syn cache does the checksum
> calculation by hand, instead of the established mechanism in ip
> output.
>
On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 04:18:30PM +, Job Snijders wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Claudio made some suggestions to pass the desired modification times
> around in a different way, below is an updated patch proposal.
> I also added some instrumentation to also adjust GBRs and TAKs.
>
> RIPE & APNIC
Omar Polo wrote:
> sorry for the delay, this is another mail that I meant to take a look
> earlier...
Thanks for the review, Omar!
> > > together with a small
> > > rewrite in test_eval TO_FILTT case, as it was a bit too difficult for me
> > > to read: it seems that, for legacy reason (haven't
On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 02:38:23PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 04:18:30PM +, Job Snijders wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > Claudio made some suggestions to pass the desired modification times
> > around in a different way, below is an updated patch proposal.
> > I also
On 2023/05/29 16:37:39 +, Lucas wrote:
> Ping.
>
> > According to both usage() and id.1, "id -R" doesn't accept any
> > positional arguments. This diff makes program behave like that.
sorry for the delay, i wanted to take a look earlier.
fwiw I agree. Although it doesn't makes much sense
sorry for the delay, this is another mail that I meant to take a look
earlier...
On 2023/05/29 16:36:45 +, Lucas wrote:
> Ping.
>
> > Hi tech@,
> >
> > Both test.1 and ksh.1 (under the non-POSIX compatibility flag) state
> > that `test -t` will default to test whether fd 1 is a TTY if the
On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 03:12:46PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 02:38:23PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 04:18:30PM +, Job Snijders wrote:
> > > Dear all,
> > >
> > > Claudio made some suggestions to pass the desired modification times
> > >
On Tue, 30 May 2023 09:47:08 +0200, Omar Polo wrote:
> fwiw I agree. Although it doesn't makes much sense to pass an
> argument to id -R, not failing may give the wrong impression.
>
> ok op@ (i'll wait a bit before commiting this in case someone
> disagrees)
OK millert@ as well if you want to
On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 02:10:31PM +, Job Snijders wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 03:12:46PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 02:38:23PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 04:18:30PM +, Job Snijders wrote:
> > > > Dear all,
> > > >
> > > >
I just checked and it seems that while zsh supports the pre-POSIX
behavior of "test -t" using fd 1, both dash and bash treat "-t" as
a string by default when there is no fd specified. So I think this
change is fine.
OK millert@ for your revised dif if you add the missing ';' after
the "return
Hi,
Currently packets sent over loopback interface get their checksum
calculated twice. In the output path it is set and during TCP/IP
input it is calculated again to be compared with the previous value.
This can be avoided by claiming that lo(4) supports hardware checksum
offloading. For each
On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 09:08:45PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Currently packets sent over loopback interface get their checksum
> calculated twice. In the output path it is set and during TCP/IP
> input it is calculated again to be compared with the previous value.
>
> This can be
On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 07:13:28PM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2023 at 02:28:27PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2023/01/12 04:49, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Is there anything else which I can do, to help this diff reviwed and
> > > increase the chance
13 matches
Mail list logo
