On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 01:42:03AM +, Job Snijders wrote:
> This adds another compliance check for the X.509 subject name.
>
> Only commonName, and optionally serialNumber, are permitted in the
> certificate subject name. See RFC 6487 section 4.4 and 4.5.
>
> It seems the one CA who was not
-H is userland threads, -k is kernel threads. I guess "kernel visible" was
to distinguish between the old uthread where threads were handled in
userland and not visible to the kernel, and rthread ...
--
Sent from a phone, apologies for poor formatting.
On 11 September 2023 10:02:32 Marc
I was reading through ps.1, which has two slightly different options
-H Also display information about kernel visible threads.
-k Also display information about kernel threads.
It's not at all obvious what the difference between these options might be.
>From the log:
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 11:02:00AM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> I was reading through ps.1, which has two slightly different options
> -H Also display information about kernel visible threads.
> -k Also display information about kernel threads.
>
> It's not at all obvious what
Not to pkgconf levels, but still way faster than what we had
Updated patch from what I've shown to people, turns out the second grep
wasn't quite working.
This does cache the set_variables_from_env shennanigans, speeding up large
processing of recursive files by a large factor (since we keep a
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 11:00:41AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> -H is userland threads, -k is kernel threads. I guess "kernel visible" was
> to distinguish between the old uthread where threads were handled in
> userland and not visible to the kernel, and rthread ...
>
> --
> Sent from a
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 12:10:17PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 11:02:00AM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> > I was reading through ps.1, which has two slightly different options
> > -H Also display information about kernel visible threads.
> > -k Also
On 11.9.2023. 6:27, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> On 11.9.2023. 2:48, Mike Larkin wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 10, 2023 at 01:36:33AM +0200, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I've installed latest snapshot with uefi on Dell R7615 with AMD EPYC
>>> 9554P, with some NVMe disks on BOSS-N1 adapter and
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 03:23:28PM +0200, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> On 11.9.2023. 6:27, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> > On 11.9.2023. 2:48, Mike Larkin wrote:
> >> On Sun, Sep 10, 2023 at 01:36:33AM +0200, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> I've installed latest snapshot with uefi on Dell
On 06/09/23(Wed) 23:13, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 06, 2023 at 12:23:33PM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 06, 2023 at 01:04:19PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > > Debugging OOM is hard. UVM uses per-CPU counters and sadly
> > > counters_read(9) needs to allocate memory.
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 09:31:03AM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
> > - * This only parses the RFC 3779 extensions since these are necessary for
> > - * validation.
>
> Isn't this still true? You don't really parse the subject name.
I took 'parse' to mean something like 'inspects', and since it also
On Fri, Sep 08, 2023 at 08:55:10AM -0300, Lucas de Sena wrote:
[...]
> Quoting from `xenocara/app/xclock/xclock.c`:
>
> > {
> > /* force reading of XErrorDB into memory to avoid adding "rpath" to
> >pledge below */
> > char buf[1];
> >
> >
On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 12:03:01AM +, Job Snijders wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 09:31:03AM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
> > > - * This only parses the RFC 3779 extensions since these are necessary for
> > > - * validation.
> >
> > Isn't this still true? You don't really parse the subject
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 10:10:49PM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> p_tv() is identical to p_ts() in every way except for the subsecond
> conversion constants.
>
> Better to write p_ts() once: in p_tv(), convert from timeval to
> timespec and call p_ts().
While this looks like an improvement to me,
p_tv() is identical to p_ts() in every way except for the subsecond
conversion constants.
Better to write p_ts() once: in p_tv(), convert from timeval to
timespec and call p_ts().
ok?
Index: c_sh.c
===
RCS file:
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 5:29 AM Marc Espie
wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 12:10:17PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 11:02:00AM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> > > I was reading through ps.1, which has two slightly different options
> > > -H Also display
16 matches
Mail list logo