Christian Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de wrote:
New attempt, now that the userland has been cleaned up. This diff
kills the remaining parts of the COMPAT_43 tty handling in the
kernel. (There are some further network-related COMPAT_43 fragments
that are not touched by this.)
Comments?
On Tue, 10 Dec 2013 14:49:26 -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
Noticed TIOCGSID in that list. Don't think that is a 4.3 compat
ioctl. Rather a System V compat ioctl.
Well, it's implemented in compat/common/tty_43.c. If we want to save
it, we need to move it to kern/tty.c:ttioctl(). Do
On Thu, 12 Dec 2013 22:03:53 +, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
make build, release, and xenocara are fine.
Full ports build done and remaining fallout fixed.
Any okays?
OK millert@
- todd
New attempt, now that the userland has been cleaned up. This diff
kills the remaining parts of the COMPAT_43 tty handling in the
kernel. (There are some further network-related COMPAT_43 fragments
that are not touched by this.)
Comments? ok?
R compat/common/tty_43.c
M conf/files
M
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 21:48:41 +0100
From: Christian Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de
New attempt, now that the userland has been cleaned up. This diff
kills the remaining parts of the COMPAT_43 tty handling in the
kernel. (There are some further network-related COMPAT_43 fragments
that
Mark Kettenis:
Noticed TIOCGSID in that list. Don't think that is a 4.3 compat
ioctl. Rather a System V compat ioctl.
Well, it's implemented in compat/common/tty_43.c. If we want to save
it, we need to move it to kern/tty.c:ttioctl(). Do we?
--
Christian naddy Weisgerber
Noticed TIOCGSID in that list. Don't think that is a 4.3 compat
ioctl. Rather a System V compat ioctl.
Well, it's implemented in compat/common/tty_43.c. If we want to save
it, we need to move it to kern/tty.c:ttioctl(). Do we?
that's a seperate issue. It can be recovered later ;)
From: Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 14:49:26 -0700
Noticed TIOCGSID in that list. Don't think that is a 4.3 compat
ioctl. Rather a System V compat ioctl.
Well, it's implemented in compat/common/tty_43.c. If we want to save
it, we need to move it
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 10:31:31PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 21:48:41 +0100
From: Christian Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de
New attempt, now that the userland has been cleaned up. This diff
kills the remaining parts of the COMPAT_43 tty handling in the
kernel.
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 23:05:01 +0100
From: Marc Espie es...@nerim.net
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 10:31:31PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 21:48:41 +0100
From: Christian Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de
New attempt, now that the userland has been cleaned up. This
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 11:05:01PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote:
Note that tcgetsid(3) is part of posix 2008... I don't see this as
a noxious interface, so I don't see any reason not to keep it...
My bad, it's XSI in posix 2008, but I was reading posix 2013, which has:
Issue 7
The tcgetsid()
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Mark Kettenis mark.kette...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Well, we don't actually have tcgetsid(3); only the ioctl that can be
used to implement it. And tcgetsid(3) is an XSI extension, so not a
required POSIX interface.
Issue 7
...
The tcgetsid() function is moved
12 matches
Mail list logo
