On 2012/03/23 11:33, Marc Espie wrote:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:42:23AM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 10:07:35 +
From: Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org
core dumps on OpenBSD are not named 'core' anyway so ignoring them
is pointless and gets in the
Stuart Henderson wrote [2012-03-26 11:16+0200]:
An addition to ignore .git files, some of us use git locally to track
changes pre-commit and, just like the existing ignore entries for
RCS/SCCS/CVS control files, there is no reason to import these to CVS
without an explicit ignore.
Yeah!
On 2012/03/26 10:16, Stuart Henderson wrote:
An addition to ignore .git files, some of us use git locally to track
changes pre-commit and, just like the existing ignore entries for
RCS/SCCS/CVS control files, there is no reason to import these to CVS
without an explicit ignore.
A few offlist
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:42:23AM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 10:07:35 +
From: Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org
core dumps on OpenBSD are not named 'core' anyway so ignoring them
is pointless and gets in the way.
OK?
Why should cvs on OpenBSD
core dumps on OpenBSD are not named 'core' anyway so ignoring them
is pointless and gets in the way.
OK?
Index: gnu/usr.bin/cvs/src/ignore.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/gnu/usr.bin/cvs/src/ignore.c,v
retrieving revision 1.15
diff -u -p
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:07:35AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
core dumps on OpenBSD are not named 'core' anyway so ignoring them
is pointless and gets in the way.
Why not making it '*.core' so it actually matches better the coredump
files ?
Landry
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 10:07:35 +
From: Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org
core dumps on OpenBSD are not named 'core' anyway so ignoring them
is pointless and gets in the way.
OK?
Why should cvs on OpenBSD behave different from cvs on other platforms?
People should not name files
On 2012/03/20 11:42, Mark Kettenis wrote:
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 10:07:35 +
From: Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org
core dumps on OpenBSD are not named 'core' anyway so ignoring them
is pointless and gets in the way.
OK?
Why should cvs on OpenBSD behave different from
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:39:02AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2012/03/20 11:27, Landry Breuil wrote:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:07:35AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
core dumps on OpenBSD are not named 'core' anyway so ignoring them
is pointless and gets in the way.
Why not
Why should cvs on OpenBSD behave different from cvs on other platforms?
It already does. But largely, lots of people don't use cvs to the extent
we do. Of course, any other svn they use will have similar issues.
People should not name files or directories core. It leads to
accidents like
10 matches
Mail list logo