The .Nm part yes, but but flex++ is not a synonym, flex generates
different output when called as flex++. This is already mentioned in the
later section on C++.
On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 10:29:12PM -0400, Rob Pierce wrote:
> Does this makes sense? I took the same approach used in chpass.1.
>
>
On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 02:26:38PM +0100, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
> The .Nm part yes, but but flex++ is not a synonym, flex generates
> different output when called as flex++. This is already mentioned in the
> later section on C++.
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 10:29:12PM -0400, Rob Pierce
Does this makes sense? I took the same approach used in chpass.1.
Regards,
Index: flex.1
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/lex/flex.1,v
retrieving revision 1.41
diff -u -p -r1.41 flex.1
--- flex.1 7 Sep 2015 15:28:06 -
