There seems to be a "be" missing in install(1).
The whole phrase seems odd to a non-native speaker like me:
those options "should not be relied upon" because they are not portable,
not "for portability". (But I might easily be wrong.)
Jan
--- install.1.orig Mon Feb 1 13:57:31
On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 04:27:06PM +0100, Jan Stary wrote:
> There seems to be a "be" missing in install(1).
>
> The whole phrase seems odd to a non-native speaker like me:
> those options "should not be relied upon" because they are not portable,
> not "for portability". (But I might easily be
