On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:02:22AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2014/01/16 08:53, Sébastien Marie wrote:
Hi,
Does it make sens to have an option to require package to be signed ?
It makes more sense to just enable that by default, when we are happy
with the infrastructure and
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 09:59:03AM +0100, Sébastien Marie wrote:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:02:22AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2014/01/16 08:53, Sébastien Marie wrote:
Hi,
Does it make sens to have an option to require package to be signed ?
It makes more sense to just
On 2014/01/16 08:53, Sébastien Marie wrote:
Hi,
Does it make sens to have an option to require package to be signed ?
It makes more sense to just enable that by default, when we are happy
with the infrastructure and usage.
Hi,
Does it make sens to have an option to require package to be signed ?
Currently, a package without signature is gracefully installed without
warning.
The patch introduce an option require-signature in pkg.conf, and it
respects -Dnosig in comand-line, if present.
Thanks.
--
Sébastien Marie