Re: your mail

2021-01-17 Thread Konstantin Schuerheck
bar On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 02:56:52PM +0100, Klemens Nanni wrote: > foo

Re: your mail

2018-12-12 Thread Jason McIntyre
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 09:44:05AM +0100, Jan Stary wrote: > Currently, pcap_setdirection() is described in pcap.3 as follows: > > pcap_setdirection() is used to limit the direction > that packets must be flowing in order to be captured. > > The "direction" is not described, except in

Re: your mail

2015-09-09 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2015/09/09 11:33, James Turner wrote: > espie@openbsd, dera...@cvs.openbsd.org > Bcc: > Subject: Re: sqlite 3.8.11.1 > Reply-To: > In-Reply-To: <20150909084510.gh30...@tazenat.gentiane.org> > > On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 08:45:10AM +, Miod Vallat wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > thanks to the

Re: your mail

2015-09-09 Thread Gilles Chehade
unrelated to this topic, I suspect your smtpd is fairly old right ? On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 11:33:57AM -0400, James Turner wrote: > espie@openbsd, dera...@cvs.openbsd.org > Bcc: > Subject: Re: sqlite 3.8.11.1 > Reply-To: > In-Reply-To: <20150909084510.gh30...@tazenat.gentiane.org> > > On Wed,

Re: your mail

2015-09-09 Thread James Turner
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 06:13:11PM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote: > unrelated to this topic, I suspect your smtpd is fairly old right ? > Running a snapshot from 9/2. > On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 11:33:57AM -0400, James Turner wrote: > > espie@openbsd, dera...@cvs.openbsd.org > > Bcc: > > Subject:

Re: your mail

2015-09-09 Thread James Turner
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 06:13:11PM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote: > unrelated to this topic, I suspect your smtpd is fairly old right ? > If this is about my fucked up response I think that was all on me and a failed Mutt reply. > On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 11:33:57AM -0400, James Turner wrote: > >

Re: your mail

2015-01-02 Thread David Carlier
In OpenBSD we just write that as free(mp), the if isn't required. Will remember it ;-) Index: fuse.c === RCS file: /cvs/src/lib/libfuse/fuse.c,v retrieving revision 1.24 diff -u -p -r1.24 fuse.c --- fuse.c 20 May 2014 13:32:22

Re: your mail

2014-01-26 Thread Marc Espie
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 11:04:21PM -0600, Shawn K. Quinn wrote: On Sat, Jan 25, 2014, at 08:53 AM, Marc Espie wrote: I agree with so-called having negative connotations. I think both those instances are using it intentionally, namely there are nasty surprises in some MBR blocks that are

Re: your mail

2014-01-25 Thread Marc Espie
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 08:08:29PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote: I generally associate negative connotations with so-called, as in the so-called free world. I wouldn't use it just to name something, as in the kernel is written in the so-called C language. so-called implies it's called this, but

Re: your mail

2014-01-25 Thread Ted Unangst
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 15:53, Marc Espie wrote: On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 08:08:29PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote: I generally associate negative connotations with so-called, as in the so-called free world. I wouldn't use it just to name something, as in the kernel is written in the so-called C

Re: your mail

2014-01-25 Thread Shawn K. Quinn
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014, at 08:53 AM, Marc Espie wrote: I agree with so-called having negative connotations. I think both those instances are using it intentionally, namely there are nasty surprises in some MBR blocks that are not covered by the so-called MBR standard. There's an actual MBR