ËÓ×ØÈÅ ÐÀÑÑÛËÊÈ ÏÎ ÓÊÐÀÈÍÅ
Âàì - ïî÷òîâàÿ ïîñûëêà
Ïðåäëàãàåòñÿ ðàññûëêà
Ìû êëèåíòîâ ïðèâåäåì
Ðàäîñòü ôèðìàì ïðèíåñåì
Ñòîèìîñòü ïî Óêðàèíå 800 ãðí, 3.9 ìëí ïîëó÷àòåëåé
Ñòîèìîñòü ïî Êèåâó 700 ãðí, 1.7 ìëí ïîëó÷àòåëåé
Ñòîèìîñòü ïî îáëàñòÿì Óêðàèíû - 400 ãðí
E-mail: mailair2...@aol.com , ICQ:
I saw u having journey here and became aroused? Yeah, it's absolutely truth
that I liked u from the first look.
Usually I'm not calling or writing men
first but some stuff happened to me when I checked up ur account.
Oh, name of
mine is Leandra. Write me about you. What's about your free time?
Some lucky people have been spammed with previous versions of this patch.
Caveat: this is work in progress, there might be bugs lurking.
Basically, I'm trying to achieve two goals:
- unify some more compat-make and make-j, so that there's less code duplication
and less weird semantics
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 13:59:44 +0200
From: Marc Espie es...@nerim.net
In the process of the rewrite, I took apart the pipe stuff I added a few
years ago. Much to my surprise, it doesn't appear to be THAT useful now,
intermixed commands don't intermix so much, so I haven't put it back yet...
On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 02:20:34PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 13:59:44 +0200
From: Marc Espie es...@nerim.net
In the process of the rewrite, I took apart the pipe stuff I added a few
years ago. Much to my surprise, it doesn't appear to be THAT useful now,
On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 02:20:34PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 13:59:44 +0200
From: Marc Espie es...@nerim.net
In the process of the rewrite, I took apart the pipe stuff I added a few
years ago. Much to my surprise, it doesn't appear to be THAT useful now,
There's an easy way to do this now.
Index: bcrypt.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/lib/libc/crypt/bcrypt.c,v
retrieving revision 1.24
diff -u -p -r1.24 bcrypt.c
--- bcrypt.c2 Apr 2008 19:54:05 - 1.24
+++ bcrypt.c3 Sep 2012
* Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org [120903 00:13]:
Index: vga_pci.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/vga_pci.c,v
retrieving revision 1.68
diff -u -r1.68 vga_pci.c
--- vga_pci.c 22 Aug 2012 20:58:30 -
Yup.
There's an easy way to do this now.
Index: bcrypt.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/lib/libc/crypt/bcrypt.c,v
retrieving revision 1.24
diff -u -p -r1.24 bcrypt.c
--- bcrypt.c 2 Apr 2008 19:54:05 - 1.24
+++ bcrypt.c
* Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org [120903 00:13]:
Index: vga_pci.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/vga_pci.c,v
retrieving revision 1.68
diff -u -r1.68 vga_pci.c
--- vga_pci.c 22 Aug 2012 20:58:30 -
On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 21:18, Alexander Polakov wrote:
Now back to underlying issues: x86emu executes some code which causes
parity check NMI (bit 7 set in port 0x61) to be generated, which causes
drop to the debugger (I mistook it for a panic).
Btw, is it intended to not include isa.h in
I never got any negative test results back about this change. I assume
that either nobody is interested or that it just works. Since this is
getting in my way of working on bgpd I would like to commit this. So
unless people scream in the next few days it will go in and I will handle
the fallout
On Sunday 02 September 2012, s...@sfritsch.de wrote:
But it may still be a problem the other way round. If adjtimedelta
would go to zero during the lost ticks, there will be some
over-compensation that is not detected.
After some more hints from Mark (thanks), I think this is very
unlikely
Include isa.h to avoid confusion while reading the code (code wrapped
into #if NISA 0 is thrown out by cpp atm).
No behaviour change, except for additional printf() before entering
the debugger (which I find helpful).
Ignore second chunk if you don't care about i386 and amd64 being the
same.
yes.
On 02/09/2012, at 8:20 PM, Stefan Sperling s...@openbsd.org wrote:
prelist_update() runs at IPL_SOFTNET. Code moved out of it into a
workq task for adding new addresses from process context should
run at IPL_SOFTNET, too, shouldn't it?
Index: netinet6/nd6_rtr.c
15 matches
Mail list logo
