Re: amd64 struct reg

On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 04:45:01PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 15:57:46 +0100 (CET) > > From: Mark Kettenis > > > > > Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 12:26:28 -0400 > > > From: Dale Rahn > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at

Re: Something that could be important to document

On 2017/03/21 09:23, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote: > I don't know if what I read time ago about how to correctly request a CA > to use with original sendmail is still important and applicable > (currently I use opensmtpd). > > As far as I understood, you must use your FQDN as the principal

Re: log.c warn severity

OK florian@ looks like the "dlg"-style logging in identd, slowcgi, tftp-proxy and tftpd needs some love, too :/ On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 10:59:29PM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote: > Hi, > > From a syslog perspective it does not make sense to log fatal and > warn with the same severity. I would

Re: wpa key vs wep key

On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 02:10:48PM +0900, Stefan Sperling wrote: > I see no reason to leave WEP enabled if a WPA key is set, and leaving > WPA enabled when a WEP key is set. > > Several cases of "my wifi suddenly stopped working" turned out to be due > to stale WEP keys interfering with WPA. I

Something that could be important to document

I don't know if what I read time ago about how to correctly request a CA to use with original sendmail is still important and applicable (currently I use opensmtpd). As far as I understood, you must use your FQDN as the principal name in your certificate. That's why I use 'server.roquesor.com'

etherip(4) vs IPsec

Stuart Henderson writes: > On 2017/02/13 09:54, Jason Tubnor wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Upon implementation of etherip(4) over an iked(8) connection, I had issues >> with passing etherip traffic over the connection. >> >> The -current man page states: >> >> "The sysctl(3)

Re: etherip(4) vs IPsec

On 21 March 2017 at 09:52, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > Stuart Henderson writes: > >> On 2017/02/13 09:54, Jason Tubnor wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Upon implementation of etherip(4) over an iked(8) connection, I had issues >>> with passing etherip traffic

Re: log.c warn severity

Florian Obser(flor...@openbsd.org) on 2017.03.21 08:19:11 +: > OK florian@ > > looks like the "dlg"-style logging in identd, slowcgi, tftp-proxy and > tftpd needs some love, too :/ yes. ok benno@ > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 10:59:29PM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote: > > Hi, > > > > From a

Re: wpa key vs wep key

On 21.03.2017 07:10, Stefan Sperling wrote: I see no reason to leave WEP enabled if a WPA key is set, and leaving WPA enabled when a WEP key is set. Several cases of "my wifi suddenly stopped working" turned out to be due to stale WEP keys interfering with WPA. I think it is better to let the

Re: ifconfig magic number

On 21 March 2017 at 06:21, Stefan Sperling wrote: > Replace a magic number with the corresponding macro. > Sure. OK mikeb

Re: Add a "random" target to bsd.regress.mk

> On Mar 20, 2017, at 9:13 AM, Alexander Bluhm wrote: > > I would expect to find more issues in the tests than in the software. > > Unfortunately I fear a lot of our tests do that. > > Independent tests cases are useful when fixing tests or doing test > driven

arm64 ampintc(4) interrupt routing diff

This brings the arm64 code back in line with the armv7 code. Can't easily test this myself right now so I would appreciate it if somebody could try this on a pine64 or one of the amd boards. ok? Index: arch/arm64/dev/ampintc.c ===

Re: wpa key vs wep key

On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 09:16:39AM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 02:10:48PM +0900, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > I see no reason to leave WEP enabled if a WPA key is set, and leaving > > WPA enabled when a WEP key is set. > > > > Several cases of "my wifi suddenly stopped

Re: cwmrc(5) small cleanup

Hi, On Sat 2017.03.18 at 20:53 -0400, Michael Reed wrote: > The signatures for the functions bind-key and bind-mouse do > not match how they are used. How so? The usage is "bind-key "; for example, "bind-key C4-equal window-vmaximize" and say for mouse, "bind-mouse M-2 window-resize" If it's

Re: amd64 struct reg

> Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 15:57:46 +0100 (CET) > From: Mark Kettenis > > > Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 12:26:28 -0400 > > From: Dale Rahn > > > > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 11:54:03AM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > > > Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 13:31:32 +1100

Re: amd64 struct reg

> Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 12:26:28 -0400 > From: Dale Rahn > > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 11:54:03AM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > > Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 13:31:32 +1100 > > > From: Jonathan Gray > > > Cc: tech@openbsd.org > > > Mail-Followup-To: Mark Kettenis