On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 04:45:01PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 15:57:46 +0100 (CET)
> > From: Mark Kettenis
> >
> > > Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 12:26:28 -0400
> > > From: Dale Rahn
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at
> Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 15:57:46 +0100 (CET)
> From: Mark Kettenis
>
> > Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 12:26:28 -0400
> > From: Dale Rahn
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 11:54:03AM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > > Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 13:31:32 +1100
> Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 12:26:28 -0400
> From: Dale Rahn
>
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 11:54:03AM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 13:31:32 +1100
> > > From: Jonathan Gray
> > > Cc: tech@openbsd.org
> > > Mail-Followup-To: Mark Kettenis
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 09:15:09AM -0700, Philip Guenther wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Mar 2017, Dale Rahn wrote:
> ...
> > Including the thread pointer would seem to make sense, but there is there
> > a proc vs process issue there (thread vs p
>
> Uh, the registers are _all_ per-thread!
>
>
> Philip
>
On Mon, 20 Mar 2017, Dale Rahn wrote:
...
> Including the thread pointer would seem to make sense, but there is there
> a proc vs process issue there (thread vs p
Uh, the registers are _all_ per-thread!
Philip
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 11:54:03AM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 13:31:32 +1100
> > From: Jonathan Gray
> > Cc: tech@openbsd.org
> > Mail-Followup-To: Mark Kettenis , tech@openbsd.org
> > Content-Disposition: inline
> >
> Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 13:31:32 +1100
> From: Jonathan Gray
> Cc: tech@openbsd.org
> Mail-Followup-To: Mark Kettenis , tech@openbsd.org
> Content-Disposition: inline
> X-XS4ALL-DNSBL-Checked: mxdrop306.xs4all.net checked 210.15.216.215 against
> DNS
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 01:35:04AM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> It turns out that pretty much all relevant aarch64 OSes use the same
> layout for transferring registers in their debug interfaces. Except
> for us. That doesn't make sense and would mean I'd have to do
> additional work in my lldb