No I agree and I may consider Rollback RX. I don't know though.
On 10/10/2011 10:32, Gordon Smith wrote:
Hi Chris
Yes, that is true. But Rollback is far more powerful. I totally understand
why people are often tempted to go with the free options and nothing else.
Please don't think I'm
hello Chris
Hey, guess what? You just deactivate the programme again. :)
Gordon
On 10 Oct 2011, at 14:07, chris hallsworth wrote:
But can I ask, what happens if I need to change computers? Because they use
online activation don't they, which I can fully understand but you know what
if.
Chris
You're trying to make things difficult for yourself. :) All you do is contact
support and they will sort you out.
Gordon
On 10 Oct 2011, at 17:30, chris hallsworth wrote:
Oh wow, so say my computer went bust and I could not deactivate it? If I
activate on the new computer will it
Ar very true. Sorry about that. Thanks for your help as always.
On 10/10/2011 18:21, Gordon Smith wrote:
Chris
You're trying to make things difficult for yourself. :) All you do is contact
support and they will sort you out.
Gordon
On 10 Oct 2011, at 17:30, chris hallsworth wrote:
Oh wow,
Hello Dane
There is still a lot that you cannot do with System Restore, even under 7. For
instance you can't, as I understand it, restore individual files. And as far as
I know it isn't accessible. I could be wrong there; please somebody correct me
if I am.
But we'll be sticking with RollBack
ah yep! no one is even suggesting that System Restore is a replacement
for Rollback but think of things this way, Windows assume that people
are using the recycle Bin so there's the avenue of retreiving files,
again a question of horses for courses.
On 10/10/2011 10:48 AM, Mrs. Lynnette
