Hi!
Some comments about Simon's proposed accounts API, to be found at:
http://people.collabora.co.uk/~smcv/accountmanager.html#org.freedesktop.Telepathy.AccountManager
- About RequestPresence: If we expect clients to care about changes to
the requested presence YES WE DO! :-)
-
ext [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've given some thought on how to attain flexibility in account conditions,
suitable to cover at least the few use cases I'd like to be able to
implement, without pushing the API into the realm of spooky hard theoretical
science.
Basically, the
Hi Lalita,
The privacy interface is marked as causes havoc in the spec (and hence
deprecated in libtelepathy) is because nobody has implemented it yet, so
we have no idea whether it's useful or applicable to real world
protocols. It's possible that when we (or someone else) did implement
this, it
ext [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Which has the disadvantage of taking some more memory, but the
advantage
of being sensibly simpler.
I disagree: you expose the client to the science of expression forms; in the
example above, it has to duplicate mandatory conditions in every term in the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 08 Feb 2008 at 09:59:48 +0200, Alberto Mardegan wrote:
- About RequestPresence: If we expect clients to care about changes to
the requested presence YES WE DO! :-)
OK, I'll make RequestedPresence a separate r/w property. I honestly
Hi,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
ext Alberto Mardegan
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 10:36 AM
Cc: telepathy@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Telepathy] Account conditions overengineered
I think this gives a good enough basis
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
ext Alberto Mardegan
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 3:27 PM
To: Telepathy
Subject: Re: [Telepathy] Account conditions overengineered
Ah, now I see that I didn't understand your proposal; so, you mean
Il giorno gio, 07/02/2008 alle 21.02 +, Robert McQueen ha scritto:
* What's the purpose of the last change reason being kept around in the
list of transfers? Guarding against an incoming offer being cancelled
before the client has launched/responded?
Yes, for instance you could have
