-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 at 12:31:59 -0700, Ted Gould wrote:
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 12:41 +0100, Alban Crequy wrote:
Le Thu, 10 Apr 2008 13:18:14 -0700,
Ted Gould [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Plus the low level protocol could be SXE on Jabber, or
On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 12:26 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 at 12:31:59 -0700, Ted Gould wrote:
Sure, I understand. SXE has the same issues that Abicollab, and I
actually like the protocol we used in Inkboard better than both of them.
But, my goal there is to help SXE get
Le Thu, 10 Apr 2008 13:18:14 -0700,
Ted Gould [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 10:06 -0700, Ted Gould wrote:
I like this idea. I'm not sure if you're familiar with SXE by the
Jabber folks, but I think it'd be an interesting spec to use as a
model for how this stuff works.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 at 13:28:19 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
Rob and I have come up with the following design:
* channels are not necessarily unique per (channel type, handle type,
handle) any more - necessary for proper support of XMPP message
On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 15:51 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
Originally, I thought that the way forward was to have an object
representing a bundle of channels. However, I'm now leaning more towards
having secondary channels optionally point to a main channel - this
would simplify dispatching to:
