Re: Boot issue, probably with grub and maybe mdraid

On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 12:18:30 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 18:37:20 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote: Today one of three machines failed to boot 6.2.0-0.rc4. The machine that failed had not been rebooted in a week and now won't boot any kernel and it appears grub

Re: Boot issue, probably with grub and maybe mdraid

On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 18:37:20 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote: Today one of three machines failed to boot 6.2.0-0.rc4. The machine that failed had not been rebooted in a week and now won't boot any kernel and it appears grub is aborting with a pointer out of range error. All three machines

Re: Boot issue, probably with grub and maybe mdraid

On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 18:37:20 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote: Today one of three machines failed to boot 6.2.0-0.rc4. The machine that failed had not been rebooted in a week and now won't boot any kernel and it appears grub is aborting with a pointer out of range error. All three machines

Boot issue, probably with grub and maybe mdraid

Today one of three machines failed to boot 6.2.0-0.rc4. The machine that failed had not been rebooted in a week and now won't boot any kernel and it appears grub is aborting with a pointer out of range error. All three machines use ext4 and luks, but only the failing machine uses mdraid. I

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 37 Rawhide 20220517.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 09:41:26 +, rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 37 Rawhide 20220517.n.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release

IRC link for kernel test day uses freenode

Currently the irc link on https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2021-07-11_Kernel_5.13_Test_Week points to irc://irc.freenode.net/#fedora-test-day . I think that it should probably be updated to point to librechat, but I'm not sure enough to make the change myself.

Re: Can dxvk be turned on/off per app?

On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 10:54:50 +0200, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote: I pushed the 1.7.1 into F34-F31 just moments ago. You can grab the rpms from koji or wait till tomorrow (or whenever we get another F33/34 compose). I tried it and Sins still doesn't start and Heroes of Might and Magic III

Re: Can dxvk be turned on/off per app?

On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 09:31:57 +0200, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote: On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 4:50 AM Bruno Wolff III wrote: The next dxvk enhancement for wine broke Sin of the Solar Empire - Rebellion (GoG's version) for me, but works for some other games. Right now I've turned it off

Can dxvk be turned on/off per app?

The next dxvk enhancement for wine broke Sin of the Solar Empire - Rebellion (GoG's version) for me, but works for some other games. Right now I've turned it off for everything, but I'd like to only turn it off for games that have a problem. I looked at the feature page and there doesn't seem

Re: some Rawhide feedback

On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 21:30:41 -0500, David wrote: Today's update seemed to go smoothly. I think I would call this a typical minor update that happens about twice a week, or maybe three times per week ? Normally there is a new compose daily. You can look at the recent ones at:

Re: system upgrade problems

On Sun, Feb 09, 2020 at 20:46:06 +, George R Goffe via test wrote: Stan, Thank you very much for your response... AND the information. I guess I'll just wait and see what happens. I have seen some of these problems for several months though I haven't been tracking them. What I do is

CI Wrapper tests

I am trying to get a wrapped test script to work for squashfs-tools and the artifacts don't appear to be properly saved. I think I might be misunderstanding the wrapper example. Is the idea really that the test should run ansible with the basic role referring to the wrapper? I have been trying

Heads up, systemd-240-4 might cause problems

I went from 240-2 to 240-4 on one machine today (I have another that doesn't work with 240 at all with different symptons.) and it looks like dbus probably was broken. I couldn't use Xfce or Gnome after rebooting, but Lxde still was usable. Downgrading systemd fixed things. Bug 1666083.

Rawhide dnf issue recovery

In case anyone else had dnf segflaulting on update recently. The current (in rawhide) set of dnf packages fixes the problem. You can use the distro-sync command to do the update instead of the update command. It is quite possible no one else saw this as it only happened on one machine and I

Re: Cairo 1.15.12-1.fc29 has a serious regression

On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 08:21:51 -0500, Bruno Wolff III <br...@wolff.to> wrote: Cairo 1.15.12-1.fc29 has broken bino and gmplayer at least and likely other things. 1.15.10-5.fc29 still works fine. Bug 1567611: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1567611 It turns out this also

Re: Cairo 1.15.12-1.fc29 has a serious regression

On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 18:07:41 +0200, Kalev Lember <kalevlem...@gmail.com> wrote: On 04/15/2018 03:21 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: Cairo 1.15.12-1.fc29 has broken bino and gmplayer at least and likely other things. 1.15.10-5.fc29 still works fine. Bug 1567611: https://bugzilla.redh

Cairo 1.15.12-1.fc29 has a serious regression

Cairo 1.15.12-1.fc29 has broken bino and gmplayer at least and likely other things. 1.15.10-5.fc29 still works fine. Bug 1567611: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1567611 ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe

Re: Packages that are failing dependencies or blocked by other packages in rawhide / F28

On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 11:49:59 -0700, stan wrote: When I run dnf update the follow problems show up before it tells me that there is nothing to do. I've only been able to run 1 update since Feb 4. It was huge, 11 GB, and took forever. I'm not even sure if I'm

Re: Kernel 4.15 Test Day 2018-02-22

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 13:22:27 -0500, Sumantro Mukherjee wrote: Hey All, This is a gentle reminder.We have the Kernel 4.15 Test Day[1] coming up. As discussed at Flock 2017, we will start hosting test days for each major kernel rebase (approximately every 10 weeks). As

Re: Is the 28 rawhide repo broken?

On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 18:54:43 +, George R Goffe wrote: Hi, I haven't seen updates from the rawhide repo in over a week. Is it that the "freeipa" situation clogging things up? Thanks, George... There hasn't been a fully successful compose since the 4th. The

Re: Rawhide XFCE problems?

On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 14:03:02 -0800, Adam Williamson <adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: On Wed, 2018-01-17 at 15:53 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 14:25:36 -0600, Bruno Wolff III <br...@wolff.to> wrote: > > I was able to recreate the problem whil

Re: Rawhide XFCE problems?

On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 14:25:36 -0600, Bruno Wolff III <br...@wolff.to> wrote: I was able to recreate the problem while upgrading and am in the middle of doing a sort of bisect to get identify the problem package. Once I do, I'll file a real bug report. I isolated this to m

Re: Rawhide XFCE problems?

On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 13:55:40 -0600, Bruno Wolff III <br...@wolff.to> wrote: Rolling back to Fedora-Rawhide-20171230.n.1 fixed the problem. I downgraded a bit over 1000 packages in that process. I'll work on slowly moving forward see if I can narrow things down, but it probably

Re: Rawhide XFCE problems?

Rolling back to Fedora-Rawhide-20171230.n.1 fixed the problem. I downgraded a bit over 1000 packages in that process. I'll work on slowly moving forward see if I can narrow things down, but it probably won't be quick. ___ test mailing list --

Re: Rawhide XFCE problems?

On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 10:30:17 -0600, This problem didn't happen on my home laptop, so it isn't a general XFCE issue. I need to look into this more on my end. I'm seeing random crashes of applications when using a few different desktops, but not with gnome and not in VTs. The crashes

Re: Rawhide XFCE problems?

On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 11:56:31 -0600, Bruno Wolff III <br...@wolff.to> wrote: Is anyone having problems running stuff in XFCE on Rawhide, probably starting within the last two days, maybe after a reboot? Gnome seems to work normally. I'm trying to guess what to revert and it's

Re: Rawhide XFCE problems?

On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 13:20:07 -0500, Matthew Miller <mat...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 11:56:31AM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote: Is anyone having problems running stuff in XFCE on Rawhide, probably starting within the last two days, maybe after a reboot? Gnome

Rawhide XFCE problems?

Is anyone having problems running stuff in XFCE on Rawhide, probably starting within the last two days, maybe after a reboot? Gnome seems to work normally. I'm trying to guess what to revert and it's a pain to just do the whole lot on rawhide since old packages drop out of the repo right away.

Re: Fedora crash reports: up in f24 over f23 when normalized to number of installed systems

On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 16:50:43 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: We probably _can_ -- the data is there. Just need to find a way to show it that brings out that answer. Maybe instead of counting number of reports, count number of packages with reports each day and

Re: only installing F24 release sets sytem time to USA eastern time

On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 14:42:43 +0200, David Novák wrote: Hi, will there be release of updated images of F24? Sometimes third parties make them, but not official ones (except I think for atomic). You can make your own fairly easily using livemedia-creator. You'll

Re: only installing F24 release sets sytem time to USA eastern time

On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 14:07:09 -0400, Joerg Lechner wrote: Hi, there is an -I think- open bug " [Bug 1018162] only testing LIVE CD, changes system time in BIOS ", in this error system time was set to UTC. Just installed the release version Workstation (6.2) after a fresh

Re: Propose for onbaording session for new contributors

On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 18:17:11 +0200, moon wrote: https://openmeetings.apache.org/ I never used it so I don't know how it is, but it can hardly be any worse than hangouts I think for very the short term, doing what is easist to get something to actually happen, is what is

Re: F24 - ncsvc VPN doesn't work any more

On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 09:53:10 +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote: Any tips on how to debug this? The ncsvc thing is the same - the change here is F24. To start, I think you want to try to narrow down the issue. You want to see if the routing is working correctly. If the

Re: F24 Beta status

On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 09:13:36 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: So please expect the RC to arrive in the next several hours, if all goes well, and be ready to test :) It won't be super different from the current nightly, but we'll at least need to do sanity testing

Re: Did luks get broken in f24?

On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 16:44:51 -0600, Bruno Wolff III <br...@wolff.to> wrote: Thanks. I re-try tonight, as maybe I got really unlucky with bad typing with the latest kernel and the got it right on the first try with the older kernel. I can also rebuild the initramfs image a

Re: Did luks get broken in f24?

On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 17:21:17 -0500, Chuck Anderson <c...@wpi.edu> wrote: On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 01:41:22PM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote: I updated my kernel this morning and my disk password doesn't seem to work when booting with that kernel (multiple tries), but di

Re: Did bugzilla's redirect checking get more strict in the last few days?

On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 15:18:29 -0600, Bruno Wolff III <br...@wolff.to> wrote: I am unable to login to bugzilla today and I think it is because the redirect test has gotten stricter but I am not sure. I saw this happen months ago with a direct bookmark, but I only had to try a second

Did bugzilla's redirect checking get more strict in the last few days?

I am unable to login to bugzilla today and I think it is because the redirect test has gotten stricter but I am not sure. I saw this happen months ago with a direct bookmark, but I only had to try a second time. Now I keep getting sent back to unable to trust my login attempt page, so I think

Odd changes in compose sizes

This release I have been seeing a lot of bouncing around in games spin sizes, even when there aren't changes that would seem to explain things. Other than one image being over the target size eariler in the process, this hasn't broken things, but it still seems odd. For example for RC6 the i686

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 23 Final Release Compose 2 (RC2) Available Now!

On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 18:30:02 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: valuable, but there's no need to go all out. At present I'm expecting we'll build an RC3 tomorrow and focus on testing that really thoroughly over the next 7 days (and any further RCs that turn out to be

Re: Call for testing: 32-bit AMD CPU owners

On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 12:08:15 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: If anyone reading this has an old 32-bit AMD system - the last range of 32-bit AMD CPUs was the Athlon XPs from early 2003, anything 'Athlon 64' or later is 64-bit - and it's not too much trouble, could

Re: Call for testing: 32-bit AMD CPU owners

On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 14:17:13 -0500, Bruno Wolff III <br...@wolff.to> wrote: I have a dual MP system as my main desktop at home. I rebooted it a couple of times this week with rawhide nodebug kernels (the base system is rawhide) and haven't had a problem. It won't boot from flash

Re: dl.fedoraproject.org rsync broken most of the day

On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 21:36:11 -0500, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote: I have been getting rsync errors from dl.fedoraproject.org since this morning. Things are working again this morning. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org

dl.fedoraproject.org rsync broken most of the day

I have been getting rsync errors from dl.fedoraproject.org since this morning. rawhide-nodebug hasn't been updated and I was able to grab other stuff from mirrors that may have gotten today's updates before the problems started. The error I am seeing is: rsync: safe_read failed to read 1 bytes

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 23 Alpha Test Compose 2 (TC2) Available Now!

On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 21:48:36 -0700, Adam Williamson adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote: The games spin doesn't show up in either list, so it seems the compose wasn't even attempted for some reason; Dennis should be able to say what the deal is. My guess is that it was because when the ks

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 23 Alpha Test Compose 2 (TC2) Available Now!

On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 20:30:25 -0700, Adam Williamson adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Somewhat later than scheduled [1], Fedora 23 Alpha Test Compose 2 (TC2) is now available for testing. Please help us complete as much of the validation testing as we can! Did the games spin not build or

Re: Possibly problem with 4.2.0 kernel

On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 11:41:59 +0100, Russel Winder rus...@winder.org.uk wrote: I should also note that it only affects the Intel video. If I force using the ATI Radeon video everything is fine. So the question is what have they done wrong with the Intel drivers? There have been fixes

Re: conflict between latest fedora-release and systemd (rawhide)

On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 13:38:31 -0400, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote: It really *can't* be included in the same source RPM, because remixes wouldn't be able to ship the source, then. Has that been checked by legal? Having a trademarked image in a source file is different from

Re: conflict between latest fedora-release and systemd (rawhide)

On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 09:27:18 -0600, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 10:01:04 -0500 Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote: That change also caused problems installing stuff with generic release that depend on lvm2. For example you can't build a generic live image

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 23 Rawhide 20150607 nightly compose nominated for testing

On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 23:50:55 -0700, adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 23 Rawhide 20150607. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release

Re: Update FC22 - doesn't find root fs and doesn't boot

And already we have fought for this user's side simplification, but it seems developers are very persistent when they do not need to be. In the past changes with this effect were reverted. This time they were not. This generally just affects people upgrading, as anaconda has been adding the

Re: Live media changes systemtime to UTC

On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 08:27:43 +1200, Gavin Flower gavinflo...@archidevsys.co.nz wrote: On 30/05/15 04:59, Joerg Lechner wrote: Hi, I add this comment about F22 here, even when F22 is now distributed as final, because I think this problem will also occur in F23. When I load the F22 Final

Re: F22 Final testing - I'm away

On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 22:43:31 -0700, Adam Williamson adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On Fri, 2015-05-15 at 20:57 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: Do we need a bug for getting a matching spin kickstart build into the release after the gold build but before release day? (I don't believe

Re: F22 Final testing - I'm away

Do we need a bug for getting a matching spin kickstart build into the release after the gold build but before release day? (I don't believe that any of the kickstart packages end up on media, but I haven't checked that.) My memory is that that is what the process was last release. The build

Re: F22 Final: karma requests

On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 17:44:51 -0700, Adam Williamson adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote: * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-7721 (something for the Games spin, karma it if it runs - Note something odd happen with this one, probably because I edited it to add a second

Rawhide not mashing?

Is there an estimate when rawhide composes will get fixed? -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Yum SIGSEGV

On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 23:53:57 -0700, Adam Williamson adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On Sun, 2015-03-29 at 17:31 -0500, Dan Mossor wrote: Rawhide should be using DNF exclusively. Please try again using dnf and let us know the results from that. Not really. yum is still present and

Re: [Test-Announce] 2015-03-09 @ ** 15:00 ** UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

On Sat, Mar 07, 2015 at 00:10:31 -0800, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX c...@omen.com wrote: On 03/06/2015 11:16 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: Wine 1.7.38 reportedly fixes the ability to install Windows apps on 64 bit systems. The inability to load windows apps into wine is a profound defect. Fedora

live image rebuilding linker cache

I was testing the games spin and saw that the boot was significantly slowed down because the dynamic linker cache was being rebuilt. It seemed odd that this would happen on a live image (why isn't it prebuilt) and that it would block the boot process. -- test mailing list

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 22 Branched 20150218 nightly compose nominated for testing

On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:46:31 -0800, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX c...@omen.com wrote: Wine seems to have been broken about the same time the kernel was bumped to 3.20. I was unable to load any of the usual apps with yesterday's snapshot. It may be just the latest wine update. I filed the

Re: Heads up - Anaconda 22.17 will enforce 'good' passwords

On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 08:53:42 -0800, Brian C. Lane b...@redhat.com wrote: I *know* this is going to be a bit of a pain to get used to. But the increased security is worth it. Super simple passwords will no longer be allowed, but it is still easy to come up with one that passes the checks.

Re: Heads up - Anaconda 22.17 will enforce 'good' passwords

On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 22:20:54 +, Andre Robatino robat...@fedoraproject.org wrote: down, they could forget it after the install, and be locked out. I was also wondering about ways to get around the password - for example if the disk isn't encrypted, or there's no bootloader password.

Re: Alpha criterion and major language related breakage?

On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 10:32:16 -0800, Adam Williamson adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Sure, it might be an idea to draft an Alpha criterion based on the Final one in that case... I'll do that. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe:

Alpha criterion and major language related breakage?

We had a ticket come up in the blocker meeting today, where I got the feeling that people felt that any major breakage that was language dependent should be a blocker. We sort of fudged this into a blocker using a different criterion, but I think if that is the intent we should note that being

Re: rawhide report: 20150104 changes

On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 10:08:05 -0800, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX c...@omen.com wrote: I tried today's install and still no graphics. Perhaps someone could figure out why rawhide hasn't come up in X for the last week or so (on real hardware). They have been testing mesa 10.5 for about about a

Re: What's with Rawhide?

On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 12:27:23 -0800, Rpmfusion has a rawhide repo but rawhide wants to see a Fedora 22 repo. Currently rpmfusion's rawhide repo is just a pointer to their f21 repo. This caused some problems a couple of weeks ago when ffmpeg couldn't work for both rawhide and f21 at the

Re: fedup f20-f21 kde broken deps

On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 11:48:00 +0100, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote: But I claim that the ordinary user doesn't upgrade to updates-testing and doesn't want to upgrade to updates-testing due to some of the stuff that's dumped in there. Too many updates, too many packages updated

Re: Fedora 21 updates-testing question

On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 11:51:41 -0500, Gene Czarcinski gczarcin...@gmail.com wrote: I realize that once Fedora 21 is released, that some of the packages in the current updates-testing will be moved to updates, others will be discarded as OBE and the rest left in updates-testing for further

Re: Note on 'systemd-216-9'

On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 08:30:32 -0800, Adam Williamson adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote: systemd-216-8 (and 216-1 through 216-5) and earlier) was more or less identical to upstream systemd-stable 216: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd-stable/log/?h=v216-stable . systemd 216-9 is not

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 21 Beta Test Compose 4 (TC4) Available Now!

On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 10:01:32 -0400, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote: So, why does the depsolver suddenly start giving us generic-release instead of fedora-release? I'm not sure yet, but I have a theory - I believe fedora-release's dependency chain got longer, and that affects

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 21 Beta Test Compose 4 (TC4) Available Now!

On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 10:28:02 -0500, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote: The way this was working was that if you did an excludes in a kickstart file (such as -generic-*) the excluded packages were not available to satisfy dependencies. However this is a relatively recent change

Re: Fedora 21 Alpha karma requests

On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 18:45:05 -0700, Adam Williamson adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-10190/python-blivet-0.61.1-1.fc21 - this one was in TC6, so if TC6 partitioning works for you (at least no worse than previous TCs), +1 it Would any

Re: Proposing new dual booting release criteria

On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 12:23:55 -0500, Michael Catanzaro mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: I therefore propose some new release criteria, based on the consensus from the desktop list. It's possible that these new criteria will directly result in further significant delays to the release of F21,

Re: Back to Fedora 20

On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 19:42:12 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX c...@omen.com wrote: I could not get httpd to run. It failed, complaining about not being able to identify its hostname and/or domainname. I started seeing this a few days ago but on omen.com it is a show stopper. I am seeing

Re: default kernel

On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 08:28:39 -0400, Tom Horsley horsley1...@gmail.com wrote: There is all kinds of cryptic gibberish in grub.cfg dealing with the environment file and saved entries so I can't even tell exactly where the heck the default is coming from, but the default selected in the menu

Re: default kernel

On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 15:04:53 -0400, Tom Horsley horsley1...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, 18 Aug 2014 07:59:53 -0500 Bruno Wolff III wrote: Normally whether to use the lastest or previous kernel by default is set in /etc/sysconfig/kernel. Well, I finally got a chance to check that file

Re: Is anyone else seeing a problem with glibc 2.19.90-29.fc22 ?

On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 11:27:35 +0200, poma pomidorabelis...@gmail.com wrote: Withd thisd breakaged ofd d logind byd d glibcd, d Rawhided i686d isd d literallyd busted! We'll fresh installs and live images are not really usable. If you already have rawhide installed and a root shell you

Re: rawhide report: 20140721 changes

On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 10:36:47 +, Fedora Rawhide Report rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote: This is pretty minor, but for some reason the devel list copy of the rawhide report arrives significantly after (over an hour later) the test list copy. This didn't used to happen. The branched

Re: Is anyone else seeing a problem with glibc 2.19.90-29.fc22 ?

On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 12:59:45 +0800, Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com wrote: $ fedpkg switch-branch f21 Could not execute switch_branch: len([]) != len(['PRIV_END: seteuid: Function not implemented', '', '', 'and the repository exists.']) ERROR:rpkg:Could not execute switch_branch:

Re: Wither Fedora 21 boot.iso?

On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 19:50:59 +0200, poma pomidorabelis...@gmail.com wrote: After 21 gets released, due to the use of 'updates-testing', do we need to yum --releasever=21 distro-sync after yum-config-manager --disable updates-testing yum-config-manager --enable updates You can enable

Re: (Rawhide users) Fedora 22 branching: What You Need To Know

On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 23:37:39 -0700, Adam Williamson adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote: sudo yum-config-manager --enable fedora and, optionally, enable updates-testing: sudo yum-config-manager --enable updates-testing The updates-testing repo isn't there yet. I am hoping we get empty

Re: Rawhide users: ceph packaging issues

On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 15:36:41 -0700, Adam Williamson adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 15:34 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: so, yeah, bit of a mess. You can probably get onto the 0.81.0-5 packages manually with a bit of judicious --nodeps use or 'yum shell' use, but

Re: 2014-07-09 @ **17:00 UTC** - F21 Blocker Review #1

On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 23:07:12 +0400, Igor Gnatenko ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Hi, On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 4:20 AM, Mike Ruckman ro...@fedoraproject.org wrote: # F21 Blocker Review meeting #1 # Date: 2014-07-09 # Time: 17:00 UTC (13:00 EST, 10:00 PST) # Location:

Rawhide heads up: cryptsetup update breaks rebooting if using luks

I don't have all the details yet, but the update of cryptsetup in yesterday's rawhide breaks rebooting if your are using at least some patterns of luks partitions. Early boot works, but mounting /home after the root pivot fails. I confirmed that downgrading to the previous version fixes the

Re: Rawhide heads up: cryptsetup update breaks rebooting if using luks

On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 08:03:13 -0500, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote: I don't have all the details yet, but the update of cryptsetup in yesterday's rawhide breaks rebooting if your are using at least some patterns of luks partitions. Early boot works, but mounting /home after the root

Re: 3.16.x on i686

On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:56:41 -0700, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7076318 assuming it builds successfully (AdamW Patching C: Take Cover!), if you could test with that it'd be good. I'm installing it now. Should be about 30

Re: 3.16.x on i686

On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 14:10:31 -0700, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 15:09 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:56:41 -0700, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7076318

Re: 3.16.x on i686

On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 13:52:10 -0500, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote: On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 11:34:53 -0700, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: All 3.16 kernels before 3.16.0-0.rc2.git0.1 are just fundamentally broken on i686, I think, unless you pass 'vdso=0'. I wouldn't

Re: 3.16.x on i686

On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 19:22:05 -0700, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: The most obvious thing is whether you have a SXXservice symlink in /etc/rc*.d; that constitutes the service being 'enabled' so far as SysV is concerned, and so in that case it seems correct for systemd to enable

Re: 3.16.x on i686

On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 19:13:36 +0200, poma pomidorabelis...@gmail.com wrote: BTW, Adam, there are people running testing Rawhide on i686! :) Yes, and I am backlogged getting bugs filed for issues I am having. I have at least two different problems with 3.16 kernels that make them

Re: 3.16.x on i686

On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 20:10:32 +0200, poma pomidorabelis...@gmail.com wrote: You're talking about systemd-214-3.fc21(2014-06-23), right? systemd-214-2.fc21 I haven't tested systemd-214-3.fc21 yet to see if the problem is still there. I'm spinning md1, what worries you there?

Re: 3.16.x on i686

On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 11:34:53 -0700, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: systemd doesn't just 'create init files', I don't think. It *does* have a concept of dependencies, which could account for this effect. Something is creating ones during boot since about a month ago. They are

Re: f21-conflicts in sugar-desktop

On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 05:42:11 -0700, Thomas Gilliard satelli...@gmail.com wrote: boot.iso (20140615) install of sugar-desktop error: file /usr/lib/macros.sugar conflicts between attempted installs of sugar-toolkit-0.98.1-5.fc21.x86_64 and gtk3-0.101.5-2.fx21.x86_54 Not building in koji

Re: How to request something for the release notes?

I saw this happen again. I was able to restart kdm in a vt. It looks like some intermittant problem and might be related to kdm. I didn't find any obvious errors in the logs. If I eventually get something actionable, I'll file a bug. I also am having issues with systemd, dracut and selinux

Re: How to request something for the release notes?

On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 13:37:31 -0700, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 14:46 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: I did a reboot and X stopped with the log file giving bogus size info. I looked to see if xorg.conf was clobbered (by an update) and it wasn't. I saw

How to request something for the release notes?

I noticed this morning the /etc/X11/xorg.conf no longer seems to be being used and that I need to put the config in /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d to get it used. Since I have a monitor that doesn't do EDID this kept X from coming up during boot. I expect there will be a few other people impacted by this

Re: Initial set of proposed release criteria for Server product

On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 18:47:46 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX c...@omen.com wrote: I would add: A strong spam filtering system, easy to set up with reasonable documentation. I think that is role specific and I didn't think a mail server role was going to be one of the initial roles. -- test

Re: Fedora.next QA planning: generic / Product-specific release criteria and blocker review issues

On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 08:11:16 -0400, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- I'm of the opinion that we should keep the blocker process unified until and unless that becomes impossible. The only benefit I can think of to separating them would be

Re: currently broken update issue with nodebug kernel

On Sun, May 04, 2014 at 23:46:40 -0600, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote: On May 4, 2014, at 7:24 AM, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote: perhaps someone just forgot about the nodebug kernel: Error: Package: kernel-debug-3.15.0-0.rc3.git4.2.fc21.x86_64

Re: currently broken update issue with nodebug kernel

On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 15:13:53 -0600, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote: These nodebug kernels are not in koji then? The koji rawhide kernels are predominately (maybe exclusively) debug kernels, except for the git0 one build on Mondays. Not as normal kernel builds. They might be

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >