On Mon, 12 Jan 2015 07:09:27 -0800
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX c...@omen.com wrote:
Another day, another rev of rawhide that won't come up in X.
I am amazed how much Linux administration now depends on X.
I think I recall that gnome-session was the problem. Downgrading same
should help.
--
On Mon, 21 Apr 2014 09:12:09 -0700
Tom London seli...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
The tt (and the liked lkml thread) describes a simpler solution.
The issue appears to be not with pulseaudio per se, but with the
handling of USB audio devices.
Since my only USB audio device is a Logiteck
On Mon, 21 Apr 2014 13:42:12 -0400
Clyde E. Kunkel clydekunkel7...@verizon.net wrote:
On Mon, 21 Apr 2014 09:12:09 -0700
Tom London seli...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
The tt (and the liked lkml thread) describes a simpler solution.
The issue appears to be not with pulseaudio per
On Sat, 19 Apr 2014 08:22:49 -0700
Tom London seli...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 3:16 PM, poma pomidorabelis...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 17.04.2014 23:54, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
On Thu, 17 Apr 2014 23:13:52 +0200
poma pomidorabelis...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17.04.2014 22
On Sat, 19 Apr 2014 09:32:00 -0700
Tom London seli...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 8:22 AM, Tom London seli...@gmail.com wrote:
I also had not been able to get a 3-15 kernel to boot-up/display
the Gnome desktop (Lenovo X200, Intel graphics).
I had tried my usual tricks:
On Sat, 19 Apr 2014 12:45:10 -0400
Clyde E. Kunkel clydekunkel7...@verizon.net wrote:
On Sat, 19 Apr 2014 09:32:00 -0700
Tom London seli...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
May be a red herring. The file does not exist on my machine booted
with kernel-3.14.
Apologies for not deleting majority
On Sat, 19 Apr 2014 09:49:57 -0700
Tom London seli...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Clyde E. Kunkel
clydekunkel7...@verizon.net wrote:
On Sat, 19 Apr 2014 12:45:10 -0400
Clyde E. Kunkel clydekunkel7...@verizon.net wrote:
On Sat, 19 Apr 2014 09:32:00 -0700
Tom
On Thu, 17 Apr 2014 12:52:55 +0800
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com wrote:
Are yo sure it's caused by newer kernel?
I just updated my system, can't use KDM to login into GNOME,
ctrl-alt-f2 and startx manully solved the problem.
3.14 stable kernel here.
Yes. None of the 3.15 kernels
On Thu, 17 Apr 2014 06:19:06 +0200
poma pomidorabelis...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17.04.2014 04:34, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
On Thu, 17 Apr 2014 02:28:11 +0200
poma pomidorabelis...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17.04.2014 02:11, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 17:00 -0700, Adam
On Thu, 17 Apr 2014 13:26:26 -0500
Steven Usdansky usdans...@gmail.com wrote:
Not sure where to report this problem (or what I should be looking
for), but when booting any of the 3.15 kernels, kernel-modesetting
fails and X comes up with a resolution of 1024x768, rather than the
1680x1050
On Thu, 17 Apr 2014 23:13:52 +0200
poma pomidorabelis...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17.04.2014 22:16, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
...
very obtuse. Please explain what they have to do with the problem.
Why do you use the Rawhide in the first place?
poma
Testing. Makes the released
With all of the kernels in the rawhide 3.15 series so far the gnome
desktop fails to load. Kernels in the 3.14 series are fine.
All I can see is that the X server seems to start (ps -A | grep Xorg
returns a PID), but the Xorg.0.log is empty. No obvious failures in
journalctl -xb. I see gdm is
On Wed, 16 Apr 2014 08:21:24 -0700
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX c...@omen.com wrote:
I tend to avoid the current Gnome, but was able to get a Gnome desktop
with Tuesday's Rawhide 3.15 rc1 with a bit of prodding. I don't
think Gnome works on wayland yet.
snip
Any help appreciated.
TIA
On Wed, 16 Apr 2014 15:07:40 -0600
Mike Ruckman ro...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Wed, 16 Apr 2014 11:11:46 -0400
Clyde E. Kunkel clydekunkel7...@verizon.net wrote:
With all of the kernels in the rawhide 3.15 series so far the gnome
desktop fails to load. Kernels in the 3.14 series
On Wed, 16 Apr 2014 17:11:07 -0700
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 17:00 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 17:41 -0600, Pete Travis wrote:
On Apr 16, 2014 9:12 AM, Clyde E. Kunkel
clydekunkel7...@verizon.net wrote:
With all
On Thu, 17 Apr 2014 02:28:11 +0200
poma pomidorabelis...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17.04.2014 02:11, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 17:00 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 17:41 -0600, Pete Travis wrote:
On Apr 16, 2014 9:12 AM, Clyde E. Kunkel
clydekunkel7
On Tue, 25 Mar 2014 09:04:08 -0600
Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote:
After aggressively defending the Anaconda team much of the weekend
from people on users@ suggesting the installer was somewhere between
useless crap and willfully designed to piss users off, I read this
On Tue, 25 Mar 2014 11:10:35 -0600
Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote:
snip
I'd just let Manual Partitioning be a free for all between the
Anaconda team and its volunteer user base to decide both features
and quality level, and leave Fedora QA completely out of it.
I still
On 01/16/2014 11:03 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 09:22 -0600, Dan Mossor wrote:
I forgot to mention that - I haven't typed the letters dnf at all on
this system until I wrote this email.
Yum is what I know, yum is what I use.
Also forgot to mention that I have
On 01/11/2014 12:32 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jan 2014 09:15:23 -0800
Richard Vickery richard.vicker...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it possible to get this mail sent out again? I missed it and would
like a t-shirt as well. When did the email come out? Perhaps I will
merely go to that date
Sinha
Tore Anderson (IPv6 testing)
Edward Kirk (tk009)
Patrick O'Callaghan
Rob Healey
Tom Horsley
Adel Gadllah
Michael Cronenworth
Ed Greshko
Scott Robbins
Clyde E. Kunkel
Antonio Olivares
Robert P. J. Day
Michal Jaegermann
cornel panceac
Frank Murphy
Joachim Backes
Bjoern Esser
Bob Lightfoot
T.C
Is there a policy or other guidance on who is allowed to close another
persons bz? For example, can a person who is not a member of the action
developer or bugzappers group close a bz, especially a non-trivial bz?
TIA
--
Regards,
OldFart
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On 12/06/2013 10:56 AM, Karel Volný wrote:
Hi,
Dne pátek, 6. prosince 2013 16:19:35 CEST, Clyde E. Kunkel napsal(a):
Is there a policy or other guidance on who is allowed to close another
persons bz? For example, can a person who is not a member of the
action developer or bugzappers group
On 12/06/2013 03:07 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Dec 6, 2013, at 10:31 AM, Clyde E. Kunkel clydekunkel7...@verizon.net
wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038885
Closed the first time because it's not an F20 bug. As mentioned in bug 864198
it's intended behavior. Also closed
On 12/05/2013 04:33 AM, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 4 December 2013 21:36, Clyde E. Kunkel clydekunkel7...@verizon.net wrote:
Message from syslogd@P5K-EWIFI at Dec 4 16:33:46 ...
PackageKit:get-updates transaction /4692_ccdcccba from uid 1000 finished
with success after 10490ms
My error
How do we get rid of the subject msgs? They spam an open gnome-terminal
like:
Message from syslogd@P5K-EWIFI at Dec 4 16:33:46 ...
PackageKit:get-updates transaction /4692_ccdcccba from uid 1000
finished with success after 10490ms
Message from syslogd@P5K-EWIFI at Dec 4 16:33:46 ...
On 11/09/2013 12:29 AM, Felix Miata wrote:
I installed 20betaRC5 the night it was announced, without installing
bootloader, since stealing my MBR is not acceptable. After a bunch of
boots and general housekeeping and testing and finding os-prober,
grubby, grub2-tools and grub2 installed, I
On 09/27/2013 09:53 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 08:49:51PM -0500, dkrawchuk wrote:
I agree. I find these digressions interesting and informative.
They _really do_ keep coming up. What if we create a Fedora Old-Timers list
for this kind of discussion? I'm not even
On 09/27/2013 01:05 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2013-09-27 at 22:06 +1200, Gavin Flower wrote:
snip
I do find the 'who's been
using computers longer?' competitions that seem to be ensuing on all
sorts of lists lately a bit tiresome :)
Why tiresome? It is a bit interesting. Way
This guy (python-blivet-0.22-1.fc20) needs some karma to get pushed to
the alpha release. Please.
Thanks.
--
Regards,
OldFart
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
For some time now (maybe a week) in rawhide the cursor disappears when
the gnome shell appears. It may or may not be present during gdm time
and initially in the lower right corner region after login, but then
disappears but its location can be inferred by moving the mouse around
and seeing
On 05/05/2013 12:43 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
For LVM, the Name field is used for the Logical Volume name. Label field is
available, but appears it's not used for anything.
For Btrfs, the Name field is used for the subvolume name. Again, the label
field is available, but the entry is unused.
On 05/02/2013 10:45 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2013-05-02 at 21:55 -0400, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
On 05/02/2013 08:43 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On May 1, 2013, at 10:25 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi, folks. I wanted to pass along a special request from the anaconda
On 05/02/2013 08:43 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On May 1, 2013, at 10:25 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi, folks. I wanted to pass along a special request from the anaconda
team for those of you who are helping to test the Beta TCs (for which,
thanks!)
There are some substantial
On 04/11/2013 03:08 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Clyde E. Kunkel (clydekunkel7...@verizon.net) said:
system-config-lvm is not in F19 or F20 at present. Will it be or is
it being dropped? What replaces it?
As a graphcial configuration tool for storage, palimpset/gnome-disk-utility.
Note
system-config-lvm is not in F19 or F20 at present. Will it be or is it
being dropped? What replaces it?
TIA
--
Regards,
OldFart
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On 03/15/2013 08:09 AM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
In case you were not bitten by Schrödinger's Cat in Grub or got around her, you
snip
# rpm -Fvh systemd*.rpm dracut*.rpm
# rpm -Fvh systemd*.rpm dracut*.rpm libgudev1*.rpm
And Schödinger's cat bites back!
--
Regards,
OldFart
--
test mailing list
The notification area seems to be missing. On purpose, or is it a bug?
TIA
--
Regards,
OldFart
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On 03/09/2013 01:14 PM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
The notification area seems to be missing. On purpose, or is it a bug?
TIA
Well, instead of missing, erratic is now a better description. Moving
the cursor around in the corner **sometimes** triggers the notification
area. Working ok in F18
On 03/09/2013 03:57 PM, drago01 wrote:
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Clyde E. Kunkel
clydekunkel7...@verizon.net wrote:
The notification area seems to be missing. On purpose, or is it a bug?
It isn't missing and it isn't a bug. You just have to push your mouse
against the bottom
yum update yielded:
...
Downloading packages:
No Presto metadata available for google-chrome
mash/prestodelta |
3.8 MB 00:00:02
Delta RPMs reduced 124 k of updates to 12 M (-10007% saved)
Didn't know negative entropy was a new fedora
--- Comment #2 from Simon Green sgr...@redhat.com ---
The Fedora team manage their Bugzilla product attributes directly.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908988
OK, Fedora team, punted over to you.:-)
--
Regards,
OldFart
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On 02/07/2013 08:47 PM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
--- Comment #2 from Simon Green sgr...@redhat.com ---
The Fedora team manage their Bugzilla product attributes directly.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908988
OK, Fedora team, punted over to you.:-)
I see closed as notabug since
On 02/01/2013 09:18 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 11:11:16 +0100,
Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 14:15:05 +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
clutter-1.13.4-3.fc19
-
* Wed Jan 30 2013 Matthias Clasen … - 1.13.4-3
-
On 01/23/2013 11:01 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
For about the last month or so it seems like yum has been running much
slower than in the past. Previously I had seen something similar when
running debug kernels, but that isn't the case now.
I am seeing a lot of time being used for wait, but
On 01/16/2013 10:31 AM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
Rawhide gnome desktop acting up recently. Have to restart several times
to get desktop that is readable. Several times screens are garbled.
Here is a bit of an Xorg.0.log that may be a clue:
snip
Any clues where the problem lies? Just rawhide
On 01/16/2013 10:31 AM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
Rawhide gnome desktop acting up recently. Have to restart several times
to get desktop that is readable. Several times screens are garbled.
Here is a bit of an Xorg.0.log that may be a clue:
(EE) [mi] EQ overflowing. Additional events
On 01/16/2013 12:54 PM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
On 01/16/2013 11:20 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
snip
exa is the hardware acceleration layer. The radeon driver is handing
something down to the kernel to execute through a DRM ioctl, and it's
not completing promptly.
So either the radeon X driver
Rawhide gnome desktop acting up recently. Have to restart several times
to get desktop that is readable. Several times screens are garbled.
Here is a bit of an Xorg.0.log that may be a clue:
(EE) [mi] EQ overflowing. Additional events will be discarded until
existing events are processed.
On 01/16/2013 11:20 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
snip
exa is the hardware acceleration layer. The radeon driver is handing
something down to the kernel to execute through a DRM ioctl, and it's
not completing promptly.
So either the radeon X driver is suddenly doing something newly wrong
that's
On 01/08/2013 09:44 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 14:31 -0500, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
After installing updates from rawhide 20121219 had to revert clutter,
clutter-gtk and mutter to get desktop back. Don't know what is causing
this or who to bz. If anyone knows, tell me and I
After installing updates from rawhide 20121219 had to revert clutter,
clutter-gtk and mutter to get desktop back. Don't know what is causing
this or who to bz. If anyone knows, tell me and I will bz.
--
Regards,
OldFart
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
On 11/20/2012 02:58 PM, Tim Flink wrote:
On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 09:19:01 -0700
Tim Flink tfl...@redhat.com wrote:
A slight correction to this - smoke22 is using an anaconda build with
code that will _not_ be going into beta but will be going into final.
smoke21 is the most recent build with a
On 11/11/2012 05:51 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
I am sure someone else must have punch cards too
FC
Actually I do. For nostalgia reasons, an IBM 1401 Autocoder Q two pass
assembler in brown Hollerith cards. No blank cards tho. They used to
make great note cards since they fit nicely
On 11/07/2012 02:09 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2012-11-07 at 00:42 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 11/07/2012 12:04 AM, drago01 wrote:
That's not absurd ... that's reality.
I'm perfectly well aware how absurd and real that criteria is
Does anyone else agree with Johann that
On 11/03/2012 06:27 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Nov 3, 2012, at 7:57 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R c...@omen.com wrote:
The bad news: Anaconda 18.24 (approx) could not
deal with a non empty HD. I tried a number of things
to no avail. Eventually I zeroed out the HD with fdisk
and rebooted
On 10/11/2012 06:15 AM, Ian Pilcher wrote:
snip
Am I interpreting this correctly to mean that a beta can go out without
support for software RAID and/or LVM, as long as they are not offered in
the Anaconda interface? If so, uugh.
Also if the intent isn't to support every bizarre permutation,
On 10/11/2012 06:51 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2012-10-10 at 23:33 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 01:15 -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote:
On 10/11/2012 12:31 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
We agreed at the blocker review meeting this morning that most
commonly-used filesystem
On 10/11/2012 06:21 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 10:29 +, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
snip
Please include raid 10.
For Beta? Is it really sufficiently crucial that RAID-10 work in Beta
that we would delay the release until it does?
Final is fine. (tho
On 10/01/2012 01:22 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Fri, 2012-09-28 at 16:05 +, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
On 09/27/2012 07:18 PM, Sergio wrote:
Maybe the traditional way of creating /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/zap.conf with
Section “ServerFlags”
Option “DontZap” “false”
EndSection
On 09/29/2012 02:43 PM, Carl G wrote:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=678171
snip
Thank you very much. Comment 4 in the bz solved the problem.
--
Regards,
OldFart
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
On 09/27/2012 07:18 PM, Sergio wrote:
How do we turn this on in
Rawhide? Seems the keyboard layout has changed to
eliminate the checkboxes.
Maybe the traditional way of creating /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/zap.conf with
Section “ServerFlags”
Option “DontZap” “false”
EndSection
?
No, this was
On 09/28/2012 10:34 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
snip
System Preferences Keyboard
In this new window click on the Layout tab and then click on the
Options button. In this new window expand the entry for
Key sequence to kill the X server. Once you expand that you will see
the entry for Control + Alt
How do we turn this on in Rawhide? Seems the keyboard layout has
changed to eliminate the checkboxes.
TIA
--
Regards,
OldFart
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On 08/17/2012 10:46 AM, Chris Lumens wrote:
Custom partitioning is still under construction.
snip
- Chris
In the current version I see that existing installations on LVs are
shown, but empty existing LVs are not. When the development progresses,
will they be shown?
Also, will we be
On 08/11/2012 11:12 AM, Arnav Kalra wrote:
i just installed Fedora 18 on my system and i am not able to boot it. it
gets stuck at target basic system. what should i do?
Installing systemd-188-3.fc18 from koji, downgrading dracut (probably
not necessary, but it was around from a previous
On 08/11/2012 11:31 AM, Amit Saha wrote:
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 1:12 AM, Arnav Kalra arnavkalra...@gmail.com wrote:
i just installed Fedora 18 on my system and i am not able to boot it. it
gets stuck at target basic system. what should i do?
I got stuck there on a rawhide install a couple of
On 08/11/2012 02:00 PM, Amit Saha wrote:
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 4:00 AM, Clyde E. Kunkel
clydekunkel7...@verizon.net wrote:
On 08/11/2012 11:31 AM, Amit Saha wrote:
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 1:12 AM, Arnav Kalra arnavkalra...@gmail.com
wrote:
i just installed Fedora 18 on my system and i am
On 07/17/2012 02:44 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
On 17/07/12 19:30, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
I've tried several variations on installing Rawhide on a spare machine.
More info needed Chuck.
Rawhide cannot be installed from a LiveCD\DVD.
Preupgrade or Boot FPO.
It can only be installed
On 04/27/2012 12:25 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
# F17 Final Blocker Review meeting #2
# Date: 2012-05-02
# Time: 17:00 UTC [1] (13:00 EDT, 10:00 PDT)
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
The second F17 final blocker bug review meeting will be re-scheduled to
Tuesday 2012-05-02 at
On 04/27/2012 07:34 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
snip
It's in Proposed Blockers, where it should be.
Sorry, shouldn't have scanned, should have studied. Thanks.
--
Regards,
OldFart
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
On 04/19/2012 10:10 AM, Tom H wrote:
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Adam Williamsonawill...@redhat.com wrote:
If grub2 isn't designed to be chainloaded in that way, it isn't. Like I
said, I believe the answer is simply 'to chainload grub2 you load
core.img, rather than using the chainloader
On 04/19/2012 11:09 AM, Tom H wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Clyde E. Kunkel
snip
Here a grub.conf entry that works for me booting F17 from a grub1 mbr:
# x and y are grub1 boot drive/partition references
title Fedora 17
root (hdx,y)
kernel /grub2/i386-pc/core.img
Thanks, good
Is this program still viable? Are applicants being accepted?
TIA
--
Regards,
OldFart
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On 02/21/2012 04:13 AM, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 12:28:02PM -0500, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
How do I get the numlock the turn off? (please don't tell me to
press the NumLock key!! It doesn't work in rawhide right now. :-) )
Already fixed upstream:
http://git.gnome.org
On 02/22/2012 10:06 AM, Timothy Davis wrote:
Once again grub2 has installed dozens (at least 20) different entries in
my boot menu. I understand that Fedora is bleeding edge and not for the
feint of heart
I accept that and have no problem tweaking anything. But come on now! I
feel like I should
How do I get the numlock the turn off? (please don't tell me to press
the NumLock key!! It doesn't work in rawhide right now. :-) )
I tried numlockx off, but no effect.
TIA
--
Regards,
OldFart
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
Is it GDM or systemd that is causing gdm to fail? Or, X? I can boot
with single on kernel cmd line, start NM and then exit the emergency
shell and GDM then comes up?
Anyone else seeing this? What component to bz?
--
Regards,
OldFart
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On 02/12/2012 11:45 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
snip
Dan Walsh diagnosed this as a bug in systemd where it isn't
transitioning to the init_t
context. I think if you downgrade to systemd before systemd-40 it goes away.
josh
I'll try, but I have selinux disabled. Thx for the quick response.
--
On 02/12/2012 11:50 AM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
On 02/12/2012 11:45 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
snip
Dan Walsh diagnosed this as a bug in systemd where it isn't
transitioning to the init_t
context. I think if you downgrade to systemd before systemd-40 it goes
away.
josh
I'll try, but I have
On 02/12/2012 02:04 PM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
On 02/12/2012 11:50 AM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
snip
No joy. Downgraded both systemd and gdm and downgraded even more, but
gdm continues to fail. Can get to gnome 3 desktop via single boot
bypassing gdm, tho.
Stumped.
Duh!!did NOT bypass gdm
On 02/12/2012 02:51 PM, drago01 wrote:
snip
You are probably being hit by
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789731
Yes, thank you. All is well now.
--
Regards,
OldFart
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
Is it just me, or is it getting harder and harder to debug Fedora
startup problems?
We'll see if an old dog can learn new tricks...
--
Regards,
OldFart
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On 01/21/2012 12:11 PM, John Watzke wrote:
Actually neither image seems bootable right now (at least not through a
VM) so the matrix might be overkill :-).
-- John Watzke
Install DVD doesn't boot on real iron either. Dracut chugs along
finding all of the storage devices and LVs,
On 12/07/2011 02:02 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On 12/7/11 12:20 PM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
On 12/06/2011 12:35 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On 12/6/11 11:27 AM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
[ 428.783] Server terminated successfully (0). Closing log file.
This message is there for a reason. It means the X
In current rawhide on one of my test systems (actual hardware, not
virtual machine) when I unplug/replug the usb mouse/keyboard (they are
on a kvm switch) the xserver restarts. This started about a month ago
right after the rebuild of the X stack packages (not saying that is the
culprit, just
On 11/16/2011 08:50 AM, David Lehman wrote:
Yaboot and grub1 can only do RAID1 as far as software RAID goes. grub2
can do 0, 1, or 5.
Dave
Will raid 10 be supported?
TIA
--
Regards,
OldFart
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
On 11/10/2011 09:37 AM, Tim Flink wrote:
This came up in the QA meeting on Monday and I've put together a
proposal to create a minimal system as a trial.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Tflink/remote_installation_testing_proposal
The idea is to have a system set up so that people can
Kernels 3.2.0-0.rc0.git2.0.fc17.x86_64 and
3.2.0-0.rc0.git3.0.fc17.x86_64 seem to both exhibit problems with
networking (NM thinks cable is unplugged), the screen blinks during boot
and reboot, and reboot hangs after disk caches synchronized (slow
blinking continues).
Bz 750007 has details.
On 10/26/2011 12:18 PM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
Installation completed but at first boot I completed the normal user
definition and sent profile, but then instead of login window I get a
window with message:
failed to load session
Haven't been able to update rawhide since 24 Oct. Issues?
TIA
--
Regards,
OldFart
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On 10/26/2011 01:07 PM, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
Be more specific about what's going wrong?
On 10/26/2011 1:08 PM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
Haven't been able to update rawhide since 24 Oct. Issues?
TIA
For two days in a row and one day showing a rawhide report:
$ sudo yum --skip-broken
On 10/11/2011 04:05 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
We are going to be having another proventesters meetup tomorrow on IRC
in #fedora-meeting at 18:00UTC.
Purpose of meetup: Brainstorm ideas on improving testing and processes
for testing updates.
* Intro/gather more agenda items
* Recruiting more
On 10/09/2011 10:35 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
The email now says things like:
The following Fedora 15 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-13785
instead of
rpm-4.9.1.2-1.fc15 critical path security update
I'm assuming
On 10/10/2011 01:27 PM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
On 10/09/2011 10:35 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
The email now says things like:
The following Fedora 15 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-13785
instead of
rpm-4.9.1.2-1
On 09/28/2011 03:48 PM, Mike Chambers wrote:
On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 12:13 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
It's been proposed that we setup another list that just contains the
'updates-testing' reports for folks who are interested in testing
updates, but don't want to see all the rawhide/branched
Updated F16 today and a new kernel was installed; however, the new
grub.cfg entry appears to have copied the kernel cmd line from the
previous grub.cfg entry and not from /etc/default/grub GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX=
Anyone else seeing this?
--
Regards,
OldFart
--
test mailing list
On 09/26/2011 10:11 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 09:55:19 -0400
Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
I have seen this before after a systemd update. One time occurrence
usually.
Judging from the normal messages I see on reboot, the code
is trying to do some sort of root pivot to swap
Can't get a display manager due to above error with
systemd-36-2.fc16.x86_64. Leaves system hanging until C-A-Del reboot.
Had to revert to systemd-35-1.fc16.x86_64.
BZ 741078
--
Regards,
OldFart
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
On 09/21/2011 12:39 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 12:36:28 -0400
Samuel Greenfeldgreenf...@laptop.org wrote:
I presume you have verified that the Copr group (if 18:00, as in the
first emails) and EMEA Ambassadors (if 19:00) are not using the
channel then (
1 - 100 of 244 matches
Mail list logo
