r shows me the
internal display enabled and available.
Not sure, if it's a GDM issue then.
Matthias
--
Matthias Runge <mru...@matthias-runge.de>
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 15/06/16 09:26, Joachim Backes wrote:
> I installed switchdesk and tried the change my desktop environment
> simply by calling
>
> switchdesk
>
> The switchdesk manpage says: This should present a dialog box
> which allows the user to choose between the available desktops
> installed on
://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-9006/redhat-lsb-4.1-14.fc19
--
Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
/Mailing_list_guidelines
--
Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
=/usr/sbin/NetworkManager --no-daemon )
which doesn't really look connected for me at all.
Any hints, how to debug this? The output I see is caps-lock/scroll-lock
blinking
I--
Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https
Any hints, how to debug this? The output I see is caps-lock/scroll-lock
blinking
Just for completeness, I filed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=964066
--
Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https
.
Interesting part is a kernel from f18 works, and the 3.10-rc?? from
rawhide-nodebug works as well.
--
Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de
mru...@fedoraproject.org
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo
instructions to do so, since
systemd replaced sysvinit. :-(
Instead you should:
yum install systemd-analyze
and then execute systemd-analyze blame
or systemd-analyze plot bootchart.svg
(probably the latter, and please post that graphic somewhere)
Matthias
- --
Matthias Runge mru...@matthias
*.rpmnew files, these are the new ones so you might
want to merge them. rpmconf is a tool made for that). Also make
sure you reverted that comment on /etc/pam.d/lightdm.
Then boot to graphical.target and look at the logs in case it
doesn't work.
- --
Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/02/2012 01:41 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
On Sun, 02 Dec 2012 13:23:10 +0100 Matthias Runge
mru...@matthias-runge.de wrote:
I remember that one on a kvm virtual machine, filed as bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870007
machine, e.g via aeolus or so,
imho that doesn't get counted. In most cases, these are machines run on
kvm/xen hosts.
--
Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de
mru...@fedoraproject.org
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
--
Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de
mru...@fedoraproject.org
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
it's the 21st century and we would
loose warranty?
N!, right?
We definitely need to ensure, Fedora runs quite well as dual boot
installation.
--
Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de
mru...@fedoraproject.org
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
request for bumblebee
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827167
--
Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de
mru...@fedoraproject.org
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
?
IMHO requiring bz reports will drastically lower the number of testing
reports, especially when you need to file a bug.
--
Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de
mru...@fedoraproject.org
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https
seeing here many nfs4 mounts. It may be
related to some kerberos change? sssd?
--
Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de
mru...@fedoraproject.org
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
submitting an update run checks of dependent
packages)
If yes, how to automate this? Is there a way to access the check-section
of a package from outside?
--
Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de
mru...@fedoraproject.org
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
behaviour, produced somewhere else.
Most of required description is already there, so it can't be to hard,
to execute those tests from check-section.
--
Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de
mru...@fedoraproject.org
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
during build.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts with me.
--
Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de
mru...@fedoraproject.org
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
/metalink | 31 kB
[...]
No Matches found
Where did you get that binary? You should report an error against that.
--
Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de
mru...@fedoraproject.org
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796373
--
Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de
mru...@fedoraproject.org
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
this was an error, as it is not intended to have installed
both.
--
Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de
mru...@fedoraproject.org
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
? Since I can't login, I can't
get a package list.
- --
Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de
mru...@fedoraproject.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPOM
reproduce this.
firefox-7.0.1-3.fc16.x86_64
Further more: is this a bug in fedora or is this a bug on this special
web page? I would say the latter, although I understand your annoyance.
Matthias
- --
Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de
mru...@fedoraproject.org
-BEGIN PGP
-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce
- --
Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de
mru...@fedoraproject.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http
://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735268
Matthias
- --
Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de
mru...@fedoraproject.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOacs3AAoJEOnz8qQwcaIWAJAH
, this regression was fixed with that update, which circles
me back to the benchmark-question.
Matthias
- --
Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de
mru...@fedoraproject.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http
benchmark to try out?
- --
Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de
mru...@fedoraproject.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOZxEwAAoJEOnz8qQwcaIWTRQIALCQ1+uNMMu5iKv0fLGIPL7A
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 31/03/11 18:09, Joachim Backes wrote:
On 03/31/2011 05:50 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
W dniu 31 marca 2011 17:39 użytkownik Joachim Backes
joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de napisał:
On 03/31/2011 05:32 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
On 29/11/10 19:08, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 12:40 -0500, James Laska wrote:
Things that some people see as problematic are:
* Having to wait a week to push an update if you can't find testing
* Testing being required for packages with automated test suites
* The delay
On 30/11/10 10:51, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 09:31:31 +0100, Matthias wrote:
On 29/11/10 19:08, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 12:40 -0500, James Laska wrote:
Things that some people see as problematic are:
* Having to wait a week to push an update if you
On 22/11/10 18:01, Marudhu Pandiyan wrote:
I'm using F13 on a Intel Core2 duo i686 architecture 32bit.
Intel Mobile chipset Graphics card.
Gnome as the Prefered Desktop.
But i dn know wat does the desktop environment going to do in suspending
the
system. And i686 or i386 or i586..
On 02/09/10 03:58, Adam Williamson wrote:
Because there are always suspend issues, kernel team doesn't consider
suspend problems a blocker for release.
This is really sad; just a few Fedora releases suspended and resumed
fine right of the box on my T43 Thinkpad, F 13 belonged to them.
I really
On 02/09/10 08:29, Rodd Clarkson wrote:
Anyhow, what a waste of time all around. I spend a couple of painful hours
booting and rebooting my system to try and isolate this bug and the
developers couldn't take two minutes to mention that they needed to post the
kernel and that they would
34 matches
Mail list logo
