On 9/26/22 9:38 AM, stan via test wrote:
I don't use kodi, but I think that in this case the fedora firewalld
should have precedence. Thus, I would suggest you open a bug against
kodi at rpmfusion.
Please don't. This was already done and closed.
On 9/23/22 3:46 PM, Earnest Henderson wrote:
Apparently that has not made it into Fedora 37 yet?
Upstream has removed it, but they have also not released a new version that includes
the change.
The Fedora firewalld package maintainer needs to either remove the file or apply the
patch that
On 4/7/20 12:30 PM, Dario Lesca wrote:
I use Fedora 32 ... and the TLS 1.0/1.1 are already disabled by default
Please file a bug.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 4/7/20 11:28 AM, Dario Lesca wrote:
On evolution ML Milan say that:
the protocols are disabled system-wide.
Read (and edit) the /etc/crypto-policies/config
file to change the settings. I do not know whether it has any user-
level setting, apart of the environment variable you found.
Hello,
The following update needs some karma so it can be released sooner than 12 days from
now.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-25291e492f
The lzo package was updated last month from 2.08 (dated 2014) to 2.10 (dated 2017).
Part of the code in the new version is not
On 11/15/19 12:05 AM, J. Scheurich wrote:
I want to approve the review request of vimvi-qt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770278
but i can't find the right page to do that.
Can someone help me ?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process
On 8/28/19 3:13 PM, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote:
I've probably misunderstood some of this. Please feel free to let me know where my
mistakes are.
The btrfs filesystem has been in development for years. It entered into the kernel
in 2009. Red Hat even had an engineer working on it, but he
Hi all,
Deluge[1] has just reached a major milestone in releasing version 2.0 with Python 3
support. I have pushed the 2.0.3 update (previous version being 1.3.15) to Fedora
Rawhide. In my light testing everything appears to be working, but I would like more
eyes on it.
On 9/20/18 3:23 PM, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote:
We buy used, manufacturer refurbished PCs for the most part to keep costs down.
They are generally 5 years old when purchased and they get used for another 5 or
more years. They run Fedora and the applications we use just fine. So now it
sounds
On 10/31/2017 04:17 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
I'm having a problem with thw wikipedia.de website: If I try to open it, I get
some warning issue:
-
Your connection is not secure
The website tried to negotiate an
On 07/12/2017 10:39 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Installing wine.x86_64 pulls in dozens of i686 packages by default through
implicit or explicit dependencies.
Working as intended or else my inbox would be swamped with "I can't start app
$XYZ!"
___
On 07/12/2017 05:12 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
The x86_64 and i686 build of a package are published at the same time.
If you get a conflict like this, where the version of the two packages
is not the same, you need to examine your installation and the repository
contents to figure out why you
On 05/05/2016 11:55 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
But with the installed thunderbird, I get no lightning functionality, only with
installing the addon lightning-4.7-sm+tb-linunx.xpi (I think, starting with
thunderbird-45.0-4.fc24). With previous F24 TB versions, no flaw!
The way they designed
On 05/05/2016 10:24 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
Anybody sees this too: no more thunderbird-lightning for f24, I have to install
the xpi file from the thunderbird extension download site (as in earlier times)!
The Lightning extension is shipped with Thunderbird itself. It has been since
On 10/19/2015 12:20 AM, upda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
The following Fedora 21 Security updates need testing:
Could we remove these notices? It's been obvious for years that no one cares
about them.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
On 08/06/2015 02:13 PM, Joerg Lechner wrote:
Hi,
thank You for the advices. I will buy another Pata disk by ebay and then start
testing F23.
Kind Regards
Please don't.
Please test with SATA or newer hardware. External or internal.
If you don't have a SATA external enclosure then also pick
On 05/20/2015 05:22 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
Michael, are you able to reproduce this reliably, by any chance, so we
have a test case for any potential fix?
I upgraded to 4.0.4 from a 4.0.0 build I was running. Initially everything
seemed fine.
The corruption occurred several hours later
Hi testers,
Beware: Kernel 4.0.2 and up have an ext4 corruption bug that has not yet been fixed.
I was just hit by it on my RAID0 SSD setup on a laptop.
http://news.softpedia.com/news/Linux-Kernel-Plagued-by-an-EXT4-Data-Corruption-Issue-481699.shtml
Regards,
Michael
--
test mailing list
On 05/10/2015 03:27 AM, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
The problem is mostly related to ASUS laptop. i would like if any user
have their hotkeys work out of box.
Mine somehow refuses to work even though the drivers correctly detected
it as asus-nb-wmi. See
On 04/15/2015 06:48 AM, Justyn Temme wrote:
Running on 2014MBA with braodcom wifi chipset. When trying to build akmods it
freaks
out halfway through. will post a bug report when i have time.
RPMFusion package bugs need to be reported to the RPMFusion package maintainer[1] or
RPMFusion
On 04/08/2015 09:31 AM, Russel Winder wrote:
My Lenovo X1 has the 2560 x 1440 screen. When running Debian
Sid/GNOME, the displays settings dialogue shows all the possible
resolutions with the 16:10, 16:9, 5:4 and 4:3 aspect rations. When
running Fedora Rawhide/GNOME the same dialogue shows only
On 03/19/2015 04:14 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
And obviously, for those packagers who don't mind the timeout, Bodhi could
improve and offer an option to push an update to stable automatically
after the timeout. Or after a customizable timeout, so e.g. the maintainer
could request 21 days
On 03/05/2015 01:25 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
Wine still can not load any windows programs I tried,
including: caf omen 1110776 Jun 20 2012 LadyHeather310.exe
Known issue.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192725
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On 11/23/2014 05:23 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
What's odd is that I'm certain discard worked for root on Btrfs, so I
wonder if this remount limitation is XFS only or if it applies to any
filesystem? In which case, how is anyone getting trim to work on the
root device?
Limitation of xfs only.
--
On 11/10/2014 12:54 AM, upda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
86https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-9474/pipelight-0.2.7.3-3.fc20
Could someone remove this from testing? The package has been removed from
Fedora. There is also an F19 build.
--
test mailing list
On 10/16/2014 01:52 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
This is even more confusing, since I thought I made explicit that the
upstream fix is in git3.0.0, not 2.99.9##.
There is no 3.0.0 yet. Anyone versioning it that way is wrong.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
On 10/06/2014 11:53 AM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
Yes that did work but it protested about starting xfce, it required startxfce
-- :1 From there on I could do what needed to be done.
You should not have to start X or start DEs by hand. You need to fix your
environment... or
poma wrote:
xulrunner i686 29.0-1.fc21rawhide 25 M
Protip: You can remove xulrunner from your system now. Firefox no longer
requires the standalone package.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
Hi Dennis,
First off I'll have to point out that this is a test list for Fedora Rawhide and
not Fedora 19 (a stable release). Point your e-mail client to
us...@lists.fedoraproject.org in the future.
Any ideas where to get godoc from?
You have encountered a
On 01/10/2014 07:05 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
There is a project currently underway to distribute a commemorative
t-shirt for Fedora's 10th anniversary to significant contributors:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/F20_anniversary_tshirt
My shirt arrived yesterday. Thanks!
I know your list is
Adam Williamson wrote:
The submitter has just submitted it for stable, so it should make it on
the next push.
Thanks, Adam. People are usually responsive to my e-mails and the ball starts
rolling.
Wireshark is the last update that needs attention.
--
test mailing list
upda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
The following Fedora 18 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
241
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-6117/eucalyptus-3.2.2-1.fc18
88
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-17195/spice-gtk-0.18-3.fc18
82
Adam Pribyl wrote:
There is much more problems with groups in bugzilla, it affects F19 too.
You can fix this by using yum mark remove group on all groups you get a
warning they are missing (you have to have the latest yum - so yum update yum).
You don't need to bother with this. If you read
Adam Pribyl wrote:
What happens if yum downloads again the groups info? BTW: I only have two 4bytes
long file in this directory, and have the same problem.
The files in the directory are created by yum and are not downloaded from a
repository. Removing the files will stop yum from using the
On 12/08/2013 08:37 AM, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
Curious, why it blew up right now, just before F20 is released. It
should have happened in alpha and not now.
Workaround is to yum group mark remove group name here for every group
on the list. What a waste of time.
Whatever you do - do not
Adam Williamson wrote:
Well, F20 is frozen, so so they may have built and submitted an update
but it can't go stable because of the freeze...
I checked Bodhi before sending my email. There was no update submitted, but
there is one now thanks to Ed's bug report.
--
test mailing list
On 12/05/2013 03:30 PM, Andre Robatino wrote:
NOTE: The 64-bit Desktop Live is over its size limit.
As per the Fedora 20 schedule [1], Fedora 20 Final Test Compose 5 (TC5)
is now available for testing. Content information, including changes,
can be found at
Ed Greshko wrote:
Never mind. Eyes going bad. Just noticed the version of apper in current
f18 is greater than apper in f20.
This is a bug that the maintainer needs to fix by pushing an F20 update. Can you
file a bug for this?
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
atlas.x86_64 3.8.4-8.fc19 @fedora
The package maintainer has not pushed any Fedora 20 updates. Please file a bug
against this package requesting an F20 update so that upgrades work properly. I
see he has pushed a F19 update
Eric Blake wrote:
No support for running a 64-bit guest on a 32-bit host (hardware just
doesn't expose enough memory).
Your competitors software supports this configuration as long as virtualization
extensions are available on the host CPU.
Not that I'm requesting it, but a little FYI for
Elio Maldonado wrote:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-18382/nss-3.15.2-1.fc19,nss-util-3.15.2-1.fc19,nss-softokn-3.15.2-1.fc19,nspr-4.10.1-1.fc19
Thank you in advance,
Thanks for sending out the email and fixing this problem. Karma left!
Michael
--
test mailing list
Chris Murphy wrote:
Does anyone know the prevalence of computers shipping with Intel Smart Response
Technology (binds SSD and HDD, using SSD as a cache) enabled? And should there
be an RFE for anaconda to identify such configurations?
The computers I have seen with ISRT have it disabled by
On 08/02/2013 05:31 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
This is not really the right list for the issue, but I suggest you
consulted the log file as indicated. Problem might be as simple as not
having kernel-headers or gcc installed.
The problem is that the NVIDIA binary driver does not currently support
On 07/06/2013 08:41 PM, upda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
The following Fedora 17 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
366https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-10269/revelation-0.4.14-1.fc17
On 06/22/2013 11:05 AM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
The p8z77-vle plus BIOS does not seem to have a problem with this keyboard.
Once Fedora finishes booting the keyboard is recognized.
The grub2 boot however does not read keyboard presses,
preventing selection of anything but the latest Fedora
On 06/18/2013 01:27 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
With the system installed, dragging e.g. a Firefox window, around the screen
approximates the same behavior. gnome-shell is pegged. This doesn't seem
right.
The system I am typing from has the NVIDIA binary driver and experiences
the same pegged
On 05/29/2013 10:11 PM, upda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
mesa-9.2-0.7.20130528.fc18 (FEDORA-2013-9611)
Mesa graphics libraries
Update Information:
Massive graphics update for F18, including:
- Mesa resync with
On 04/27/2013 04:36 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
Can you show me?
$ rpm -qa unrar
Igor,
The point of the file-roller update is to not require the non-free RAR
binary. The unrar package should no longer be required. The unar
package takes its place.
--
test mailing list
On 04/25/2013 11:51 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
I did hit Esc, it didn't work.
You want the Enter key. :)
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On 04/17/2013 10:50 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
FWIW, I didn't do any debugging. I did experience slowness but my goal was to
install since my DVD download got corrupted (my fault). Once installed and
Guest Additions installed all works fine.
I cannot run any application, including anaconda.
On 04/18/2013 01:49 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
I cannot run any application, including anaconda. Perhaps if I let it
sit overnight anaconda might display, but then I'd have to wait a week
for it to install at this pace.
I managed to get SSH running by starting in 3 and then switching to
5
On 04/18/2013 08:07 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
Are using vbox from rpmfusion ?
Please see my previous email:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2013-April/114890.html
In answer to your question: No, I am using the official package.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On 04/18/2013 12:29 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
What is the official version and how does it differ from
the Rpmfusion version?
https://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Linux_Downloads
It doesn't differ from the RPMFusion version.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On 04/18/2013 06:59 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
For the tenth time this week :), debug kernel. Try a nodebug kernel, or
'slub_debug=-'. It helps when running the installer as well as on
installed systems.
When you want the mass public to test the image you produced, it doesn't
help when it is
On 04/18/2013 08:20 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
No, they've had debug kernels for ages, but debug kernels got quite a
lot slower with the 2.6.40 release (IIRC). Before that the difference
wasn't so great.
Ah, time has flown. It seems just yesterday I read the discussions about
when to
Is there a trick to getting F19 and VirtualBox to play nice?
Host:
Fedora 18 x86_64
VBox 4.2.12
3ghz quad core
When I load the latest F19 Alpha LiveCD ISO it takes about 5 minutes
just to get to the desktop. Once there, the CD access never stops, and a
CPU core is always 100%. My clicks take
On 04/17/2013 09:31 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Try 4.2.10. I saw someone somewhere mention that 4.2.12 was crazy slow
but 4.2.10 worked fine.
Same behavior with 4.2.10.
I can boot into the console (3 on kernel cmdline) and CD access stops
and nothing uses any CPU. It seems X related, but I
On 03/19/2013 05:30 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Which component should I file the bug against? Fedup?
Bug created: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=923807
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On 03/18/2013 11:18 AM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
Python-imaging seems to be missing from Fedora 19 and rawhide.
Pillow is installed but WSPR won't run because it can't import
the stuff that used to be in python-imaging.
Chuck,
You will find it helpful to read the FeatureList wiki
On 03/10/2013 08:27 PM, upda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
The following Fedora 18 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
121https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-17834/cumin-0.1.5522-4.fc18
Adam Jackson wrote:
The smiley does not make this less condescending.
We will be updating Mesa aggressively. I said as much on the phone to
Valve last week.
I asked this on the legal list but did not receive a response.
What's the status of enabling the floating-point features in Mesa? It
On 03/04/2013 08:42 AM, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
[mediawiki119-HTTP302Found]
mediawiki119-HTTP302Found-2.0.1-3.fc19.noarch requires mediawiki119
[mediawiki119-RSS]
mediawiki119-RSS-2.16-4.fc19.noarch requires mediawiki119
[mediawiki119-intersection]
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883182
I wasn't sure on the component. Feel free to correct. Thanks!
Apparently lorax was incorrect.
Does anyone have any input on what component this should be filed against?
--
test mailing list
test
Chris Murphy wrote:
I'm not understanding the problem in the bug.
The Date/Time setting is required by anaconda before package
installation may begin. I wanted to make this an optional setting. In
order for it to be optional the date/time must be set to something
reasonable from a trusted
Michal Jaegermann wrote:
You are not authorized to access bug #690713.
Well, that does not help very much unless you happen to be authorized.
I can see the bug just fine. Have you tried logging in? Maybe you are
banned?
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
I have a few boxes that use a local repository that is rsync'd for both
fedora and updates. When I tried out fedup --network the tool
showed the names of my local repos. However, when it started package
downloads I noticed the speed to be 100k to 500k per second range. This
would indicate that
On 12/03/2012 01:19 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
That's an equally confusing bug report.:) Could you please state
precisely what steps you took and what results you saw? This is more
useful and reliable than just saying what you think happened, because
part of the agreed-upon problem here is that
On 12/03/2012 01:19 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
This kind of change is very disruptive and won't happen post-Beta. Also,
we can't do that anyway: the reason there's a date/time spoke during
anaconda at all is because on some systems the clock is completely wrong
- like 30 years wrong - and that
On 12/03/2012 08:44 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
1) The logic behind the steps required to entire custom partitioning is
wordy. It should be a simple step of asking the user Do it for me! or
Let me do it! and not a couple paragraphs of text no one will read.
s/entire/enter
--
test mailing
On 12/03/2012 02:40 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Yeah, I seem to recall we've been round that merry-go-round before, and
somehow it's happening again. The first entry should indeed be the
default, so we should re-jig the order, I think.
Should a new bug be created for this or does one already
On 12/03/2012 08:47 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
There's a solution to this. Hard code the date in the installer when the
ISO is created. We know today's date and it could be set in the
installer before the UI starts. Then it doesn't matter what the person's
system is set to. It doesn't need
On 12/03/2012 10:44 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
At no point in all that did you actually assign a mount point to it. I
think you may be hitting the label/mount point confusion here. 'Boot' is
not a mount point: it is the label of that partition. If I'm reading
this correctly, at this point in the
On 12/03/2012 10:35 AM, David Lehman wrote:
Apparently you are the first one to attempt this particular workflow.
Please open a bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883076
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
On 12/03/2012 10:41 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Probably file a new one.
What component should it be filed under?
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On 12/03/2012 12:08 PM, Andre Robatino wrote:
The current defaults are mediacheck for install images and no mediacheck for
lives, so to keep that, the choice is to either make the order of menu entries
different on installs vs. lives, or keep them the same, and have the default not
be the first
On 12/03/2012 05:50 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
That's a good idea. Have you filed an RFE in bugzilla?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883182
I wasn't sure on the component. Feel free to correct. Thanks!
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
Getting to the first anaconda UI screen took a good 1-2 minutes. I
wasn't sure if the VM had locked up as I had no indication of work being
done. I can see people being frustrated with the wait and rebooting a
few times and then posting on @test or @users that F18 won't install.
The custom
G.Wolfe Woodbury wrote:
I need to file a BZ for the update EFI incompatibility but have not
quite figured out which component to file against yet.
Bare in mind that VBox EFI is not fully functional. I just loaded F17
(install ISO, not live) on a brand-new UEFI-only motherboard with full
On 11/14/2012 07:17 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
anaconda will use the existing partition label format unless you direct
it to reformat the entire drive, in which case it'll use the preferred
format for the install you're doing. It's not possible to re-label a
drive without reformatting it. So if
On 11/14/2012 07:47 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
That sounds odd. Are you double-extra-plus sure it was booting UEFI? It
should never attempt to format to MS-DOS for a UEFI install. I suppose
it might just be that the*message* was incorrect.
-- I'm a UEFI noob.
My EFI does not have any
drago01 wrote:
This would just mean we test something different then we actually
ship. If there are selinux bugs they are supposed to be cough during
testing and reported like any other bugs.
+1
There are instances of SELinux rules (bug or intentional) that only
occur under Enforcing. The
Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
Do you have any reference for such bugs that only happen when selinux is
in enforcing mode but not when it is in enforcing mode?
Yes, here is one bug[1] to get you started.
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638511
--
test mailing list
Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
This bug is filed against RHEL in any case just have it in permissive
mode up to beta should suffice and prevent any RC_N surprises
Jóhann, I didn't blindly post the first bug I found.
I ran into this bug on a Fedora system, which is the only reason I knew
about it
Adam Williamson wrote:
Michael - this is just what Chris is doing. He's clearly been to the
Bugzappers Join page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/Joining
which asks people to send a self-introduction mail. This is why we get
such mails, it's not just dozens of people deciding
On Sat Sep 8 2012 11:14:48 PM CDT, Chris Hyndman chynd...@zoho.com wrote:
Hi Bug Zappers,
I'm hoping that you will consider me as a potential new member for the
Fedora Bug Zapper team. I started installing, using and embracing Linux
distros about four years ago and it would be great for
Richard Shaw wrote:
nettle was easy enough to package[1]... Took about 10 minutes, but I
don't have any real interest in maintaining it...
Someone want to pick it up?
Nettle contains many pieces so I've taken an alternative approach to
packaging it.
Richard Shaw wrote:
I wonder, is the package name libnettle acceptable? Generally the
main package name needs to be the same as the upstream name, which is
just nettle.
You're right. Fixed.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
Rob Healey wrote:
The only reason why, would be to use it now rather than having to wait
for FC18 to stabilize a little more first. If this is such a bad
idea, then I will wait for rawhide?
GTK 3.5 is an unstable branch. There's a reason why the package
maintainer does what he does. I
Neal Becker wrote:
After doing preupgrade f16-f17, I see yum update does nothing. Maybe I
should
be using updates-testing for now?
That's the beauty of preupgrade. It brings your system up to now. An
ISO file can only bring your system up to then (when the ISO was
generated).
If you want
On 05/03/2012 06:20 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
That would be my guess too. Do you have another you can test with?
Once TC3 lands I'll try again and get back with you. I'll also try with
the latest livecd-tools. I was using the F16 package the first time. I
saw an update land into testing
On 05/02/2012 03:24 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
It's good of you to do this, but it would be even_better_ if you'd
follow the test cases at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test#USB_Stick
, file bugs on any failures, and enter your results into the matrix, with
On 05/02/2012 06:57 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
The image boots and installation (with *defaults*) begins. It gets to
160 packages of 1212 and errors on perl.
A unpack error occurred when installing the perl package...
I burned the image to a real DVD and installation succeeded.
My guess
On 04/27/2012 01:55 PM, george2 wrote:
The banking crises was in part formed by many individuals sensing
something wasn't right but did not take any personal responsibility to
act.
If you really meant the words you typed then you would be responding to
the replies to your message.
It is
On 04/12/2012 09:00 PM, Rob Healey wrote:
Is there a step by step document explaining how to change my local
filesystem from ext4 to btrfs after my computer has already been
installed???
Google works really well for these sorts of questions.
Kamil Paral wrote:
http://kparal.fedorapeople.org/misc/InstallFedoraButton.png
What do you think? Better than default?
I like it. Good work.
Would it be better to have the text say Install Fedora instead of ..
to Hard Drive? Hard Drive is becoming an obsolete term. You have flash
drives,
Michael Hennebry wrote:
How do I find the most recent image?
I'd previously thought that that was the most recent image.
Official images are made one time only. You will need to make a new
install image yourself or try a Fedora 17 beta image.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Ted Hornsby wrote:
My name is Ted Hornsby. I'm 27 and reside in the North Texas area.
I've been using Linux for quite a while, but have only just recently
started using Fedora, but I'm liking it more and more everyday. I
wanted to give something back to the community, so I thought joining the
Andre Robatino wrote:
VirtualBox 4.1.10 has just been released, and X.Org 1.12 is supported.
I wish the Linux guest 3D driver was fixed. It still hangs due to some
threading issue. The Windows guest 3D driver seems to be much more
stable though.
--
test mailing list
I installed a system fresh with Fedora 15 when it was released. I
configured the file system to have root on a software RAID 1 and then
encrypted the ext4 file system inside of the raid.
I tried to upgrade to F16 a few days ago and ran into an Anaconda
bug[1]. Is my particular use-case
On 02/13/2012 08:35 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
I'd suggest that this is 'supported' in terms of the release criteria,
under the Final criterion The installer must be able to create and
install to any workable partition layout using any file system offered
in a default installer configuration,
1 - 100 of 185 matches
Mail list logo
