On Sat, 27 Mar 2021 12:15:13 -0400, TheEvilSkeleton wrote:
> My alias is TheEvilSkeleton, but you can also call me Tesk,
> TheEvilSkely, Skelly, Proprietary Chrome-chan or anything close to it.
May I ask for your real name?
Where does this come from that people introduce themselves with
On Fri, 30 Oct 2020 00:03:36 + (UTC), George R Goffe via test wrote:
> Traffic means what you might expect it to mean. Typically this kind of server
> communicates about bugs and "special events" like outages.
>
> Since I am not communicating to bugzilla.redhat.com I am waiting for traffic
On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 11:21:07 -0400, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote:
> Are you saying that the warning message about the 19 lines is a don't
> care or is their a problem with the way the checksum file is made? Does
> this mean that the OK message that comes first is in error?
Just display the
On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 18:09:27 + (UTC), George R Goffe via test wrote:
> I have had no traffic from the RedHat bugzilla site since 7 Oct.
^^
What does that mean?
> Is the site broken?
No.
> Have I missed something or am I doing something wrong?
Start with a detailed
On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 19:45:46 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> >>> Rebooted a few times, and suddenly the symptoms are gone again.
> >>> It's like something doesn't initialize correctly when it happens.
> >
> >> Are you using Wayland or Xorg?
> >
> > Currently Wayland and Nouveau driver,
For Fedora 29 and Rawhide:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mschwendt/claws-mail-testing/
If upgrading to these packages, be sure to upgrade also "libetpan"
and not only the "claws-mail*" packages.
As a side-note, the Dillo based HTML rendering plugin package
"claws-mail-plugins-dillo" is
On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 11:28:36 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > Rebooted a few times, and suddenly the symptoms are gone again.
> > It's like something doesn't initialize correctly when it happens.
> Are you using Wayland or Xorg?
Currently Wayland and Nouveau driver, which are the default.
When it
On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 17:33:11 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> A few days later, and GNOME Shell is hardly usable anymore.
> Mouse lag, stuttering, wiindow usage taking seconds,
> itt gets slower and slower. Just watch these typos
> as a result of tryin
A few days later, and GNOME Shell is hardly usable anymore.
Mouse lag, stuttering, wiindow usage taking seconds,
itt gets slower and slower. Just watch these typos
as a result of trying to compose this email. Spontaneous
key repetition because of major lag.
F29
On Sun, 16 Sep 2018 16:55:05 -0700, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
> I have no interest in running Fedora on that machine. I have a working
> system with Arch and unless that changes I don't see any reason to
> troubleshoot other distros.
You are posting to Fedora test@ list, on the other hand,
Resetting "forcibly" by hitting Ctrl+Alt+Del more than seven times within two
seconds used to work. Now I only get a message about it, but nothing happens.
The reason I need to reset the machine like that is that simply choosing
the "Restart" option inside GNOME Shell runs into annoying systemd
$ rpm -q gnome-software PackageKit
gnome-software-3.30.0-1.fc29.x86_64
PackageKit-1.1.10-4.fc29.x86_64
It's over 35 minutes since booting F29, and the two processes are still
working on something. What is it?
___
test mailing list --
On Sun, 16 Sep 2018 11:10:02 -0700, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
> I have an HP Omen with Core i7 integrated Intel graphics and an NVidia
> 1050Ti. With recent versions of the kernel (Ubuntu 18.04 and Arch) it
> is unusable if the standard Linux "nouveau" driver gets loaded -
> screen freezes,
What's the current state of Fedora with regard to Nvidia graphics hardware?
Should it just work?
On a machine with GeForce GTX 1060, Fedora 28 suffers badly from freezes and
slowdowns during boot, unbearable slow mouse movement on the GDM login
screen, then more freezes before GNOME Shell appears
On Fri, 27 Apr 2018 15:28:35 -0400, pmkellly frontier com wrote:
> I don't use samba because I don't have any windows machines, but I
> always set up my printer using CUPS.
Two things to consider:
system-config-printer's "Windows Printer via Samba" under the hood
uses CUPS, too. No local Samba
On Fri, 27 Apr 2018 10:19:43 +0100, José Abílio Matos wrote:
> I described the problem here:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/I33KB3DVOWXCSP23NHEORDSXTQ65PTMC/
>
test@ list must be popular. No replies since April 10th despite a clear
subject!
On Mon, 09 Oct 2017 10:27:10 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > Toggling various Search options in control center did _not_ stop the
> > four
> > tracker processes and did _not_ purge large files and databases from
> > user's home directory either. Not good.
> >
>
> Thats not what the options
On Fri, 06 Oct 2017 11:03:54 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > $ gsettings set org.freedesktop.Tracker.Miner.Files index-recursive-
> > directories []
> > $ gsettings get org.freedesktop.Tracker.Miner.Files index-recursive-
> > directories
> > @as []
> > ^^^
> > ^
> > ^
> > Ouch! It's using
On Wed, 04 Oct 2017 16:14:22 +0300, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
> > $ gsettings list-recursively | grep -i org.freedesktop.Tracker
While digging, I've come that far, too. Can't say I'm happy, because
tracker-preferences at least made it quick and convenient to remove the
index directories.
$ gsettings
On Mon, 18 Sep 2017 00:49:19 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Sep 2017 22:28:16 + (UTC), notifications fedoraproject org
> wrote:
>
> > xmp-plugin-audacious's dependencies failed to resolve in Fedora 27
> >
> > https://apps.fedoraproject.org
On Sun, 17 Sep 2017 22:28:16 + (UTC), notifications fedoraproject org wrote:
> xmp-plugin-audacious's dependencies failed to resolve in Fedora 27
>
> https://apps.fedoraproject.org/koschei/package/xmp-plugin-audacious?collection=f27
>
What is this message trying to tell me?
There is
Package is absent from F27.
How to turn off tracker now?
Tracker miners running like mad as one of the first things when demonstrating
a fresh install of Fedora to someone, is really bad.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 16:24:09 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> >Stack trace of thread 1456:
> >#0 0x7ff745e9a7bb raise
> > (libc.so.6)
> >#1
On Sun, 16 Jul 2017 11:40:28 -0400, Richard Ryniker wrote:
> I have found some problems with resume from suspended state to be much
> improved after I switched to "GNOME on xorg". It is too soon to
> conclude they will not recur, but several days have passed without
> difficulty.
It has worked
Since an update of F26 on Friday, F26 GNOME Shell doesn't wake up anymore
after entering default power-saving mode. Black screen. Monitor doesn't
wake up. No reaction to keyboard or mouse.
python2-fedora-0.9.0-6.fc26.noarchFri 14 Jul 2017 11:44:30 PM CEST
On Wed, 12 Jul 2017 14:37:10 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> > Installing wine.x86_64 pulls in dozens of i686 packages by default through
> > implicit or explicit dependencies.
>
> Working as intended or else my inbox would be swamped with "I can't start app
> $XYZ!"
>
??? Then care to
On Wed, 12 Jul 2017 08:22:32 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> IMO, we need to stop allowing arch to be specified in dnf by default. Users
> think
> they need to add them and get into constant trouble by it. I've closed a
> handful of
> bugs against Wine for this reason. A command argument
On Wed, 12 Jul 2017 10:39:31 + (UTC), Thomas Goffin wrote:
> Thanks for reaction, the problem was in the duplicate:
> * gstreamer1-1.12.1-1.fc27* gstreamer1-1.12.0-1.fc27
> Maybe it will be a good idea to use 'installonly_limit=1' into a dnf
> configuration sometimes.
>
Unlikely. That
On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 12:27:34 + (UTC), Thomas Goffin wrote:
> Hello, I'm just trying to install the Wine via dnf and get:
> # dnf install wine ... Error: Transaction check error:
> file /usr/share/doc/gstreamer1/NEWS from install of
> gstreamer1-1.12.1-1.fc27.i686 conflicts with file from
On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 15:15:38 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> It's probably a driver/GPU bug, the actual shell for me has been rock
> solid of late in F-26, I'd start checking dmesg for a crash.
What would I be looking for? Only found these two suspicious lines:
[1.661411] radeon
GNOME Shell F26 x86_64 crashes spontaneously and logs me out.
ABRT wasn't even installed.
Where to start debugging these days?
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 13:52:09 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Absolutely no plugins installed. "about:plugins" refers to a disabled
> > "OpenH264 Video Codec provided by Cisco Systems, Inc." somewhere below
> > ~/.mozilla, but deleting that doesn't change anything.
>
> Hum, that's
On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 20:22:45 +0200, Alessio Ciregia wrote:
> Well, it is true that this request could easily turn into a contest. But
> looking at the bug report, it seems this is an always reproducible issue.
That remains to be seen. There are websites, which make Firefox crash
reproducible for
On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 08:25:06 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > For me it's Fedora 25 x86_64 that suffers badly from the tab crashing
> > problem. Upon visiting ordinary newspaper articles, such as
> >
> >
> >
On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 16:51:22 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1439282 (Firefox tabs
> crashing on certain sites)
> For the first one, if you run Firefox (from the Fedora package) on
> Fedora 26, if you see tabs crashing unexpectedly, can you look at the
On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 20:54:30 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?page=22=F24
> >
> > There are 22 pages of updates for F24 and push requests as old as
> > 11 days. When will be the next push to "stable"?
>
> Once Alpha gets signed off... same process each
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?page=22=F24
There are 22 pages of updates for F24 and push requests as old as
11 days. When will be the next push to "stable"?
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
On Sun, 1 Nov 2015 16:49:59 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> Going to test dnf system-upgrade from F22 to F23 but was confronted with
> the message...
>
> Skipping packages with broken dependencies:
>
> And a list of packages from "fedora" and "updates" that were going to be
> skipped. None of them
On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 14:37:42 +0200, Jon Ingason wrote:
> mkdir -p vb-2015-10-15_07\:51\:53-win10/Machines
>
> and then used to complete:
>
> ls vb-
>
> and got
>
> ls vb-2015-10-15_07\:51\:53-win10/
>
> and with
>
> ls vb-/M
> ls vb-2015-10-15_07\:51\:53-win10/Machines/
Which works good
On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 10:44:37 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
> Hi F23 testers,
>
> having a directory xyz with a subdir called
>
> vb-2015-10-15_07:51:53-win10
>
> This subdir has some entries:
>
> drwxrwxr-x 3 backes backes4096 Oct 12 18:01 Machines
> drwx-- 4 backes backes
On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 13:29:17 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
That doesn't look like it's actually connected...the 'star in circle'
If you see a 'star in circle', you don't make the graphics designer happy.
It's a sprocket, a toothed wheel, and quite commonly used to indicate
that clicking it
On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 12:35:57 +0100, Russel Winder wrote:
Zdenek contacted me direct, offlist, reminding me of yum-deprecated.
dnf update dnf would have worked, too. The problem did not break dnf
entirely.
This worked a treat at getting the necessary update done so dnf appears
to work
On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 06:34:14 +0100, Russel Winder wrote:
I just did a dnf clean all, dnf check-update (both of which worked
fine) and then dnf upgrade (which has worked in the past) to be told:
[root@lavaine ~]# dnf upgrade
[...]
TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for -=: 'set' and
On Wed, 5 Aug 2015 13:47:42 +0300, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
I can't reproduce this issue.
Believe me, you can. You only created a completely different test-case,
which may not suffer from the same problem.
How to reproduce:
1. Use Fedora 22.
2. dnf install blktap-devel
On Wed, 5 Aug 2015 14:00:59 +0300, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
How to reproduce:
1. Use Fedora 22.
2. dnf install blktap-devel --disablerepo=updates-testing
Can you send debugdata from dnf?
# dnf install blktap-devel --disablerepo=updates-testing --debugsolver
and then archive 'debugdata'
On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 03:51:12 -0400, Christopher Meng wrote:
Broken deps for x86_64
Surprisingly, the report is incomplete and doesn't find some unresolvable
dependencies. DNF doesn't either.
An undefined %{epoch} in a dependency is not found. This has been reported
to blktap:
On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 12:42:29 +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
Broken deps for x86_64
Surprisingly, the report is incomplete and doesn't find some unresolvable
dependencies. DNF doesn't either.
An undefined %{epoch} in a dependency is not found. This has been reported
to blktap:
On Sun, 26 Jul 2015 09:09:00 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
This may or may not have anything to do with your problem but it's one I
ran into with dnf...
I was trying to update a package I KNEW was in updates-testing (I pushed it
myself) but when I asked dnf to update it it gave me the Nothing
On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 15:15:46 +0200, Petr Stodulka wrote:
I remove some tickets?? I edit existing one for newer version
git-2.4.3-3 which fix it and add it into this one with ne request.
Ah, that explains it!
Or I should create another one?
That's what I would recommend -- I don't make the
file /usr/bin/git from install of git-2.4.3-2.fc22.x86_64 conflicts with file
from package git-core-2.4.3-1.fc22.x86_64
and lots of other conflicts, but the bodhi ticket has been deleted
meanwhile. :-(
*Please* don't delete bodhi tickets. Withdraw them if that hasn't happened
automatically
On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 11:07:57 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2015-06-18 at 20:03 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 11:00:58 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
Creating a new ticket is a clean start while not hiding the
previous release(s).
However, it's
On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 11:00:58 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
Creating a new ticket is a clean start while not hiding the
previous release(s).
However, it's much more likely to cause Bodhi to get confused between
the multiple 'competing' updates for the same package, and to cause the
On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 14:07:34 +0200, poma wrote:
# yum erase dnf
Resolving Dependencies
-- Running transaction check
--- Package dnf.noarch 0:1.0.0-1.fc23 will be erased
--- Package dnf-yum.noarch 0:1.0.0-1.fc23 will be erased
-- Processing Dependency: dnf-yum for package:
On Sun, 07 Jun 2015 12:48:26 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
[python-qt5]
python-qt5-5.4.1-5.fc23.i686 requires libQt5WebChannel.so.5
python3-qt5-5.4.1-5.fc23.i686 requires libQt5WebChannel.so.5
this one confuses me, there's certainly a valid qt5-qtwebchannel
On Mon, 01 Jun 2015 11:52:13 +0100, Russel Winder wrote:
For a while now, I can't pin down the exact date the problem started :-(, I
have been unable to use systemctl – which is rather problematic.
# systemctl
Failed to list units: Access denied
# whoami
root
#
Using Google I
On Mon, 04 May 2015 05:45:51 +0200, Robert M. Albrecht wrote:
HI,
I created a new file in /lib/udev/hwdb.d
[root@localhost hwdb.d]# cat 71-mouse-local.hwdb
# Microsoft Wireless Laser Mouse 6000 v2.0
mouse:usb:v045ep071d:name:Microsoft Microsoft® 2.4GHz Transceiver V1.0:
On Tue, 05 May 2015 22:04:29 +0200, Robert M. Albrecht wrote:
OpenBox does not show up at all (blank screen and the display goes into
energy saving). I will look into the logs tomorrow.
Odd. If it enters power-saving mode immediately, that sounds like a
bug. --
On Sun, 03 May 2015 15:27:07 +0200, Robert M. Albrecht wrote:
Hi,
never has this problem: F22 beta installs and runs great. But my mouse
is slow as hell.
Booting F21 on the same machines: everything ok.
libinput has changed everything between F21 and F22. Plus related
updates.
I have
Since I don't see a MOUSE_DPI setting in the output, here's another
pointer:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1204387#c1
As your mouse is a wireless one, the problem may be different though.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
On Mon, 27 Apr 2015 11:33:47 -0400, Joerg Lechner wrote:
Hi,
when I run install updates via Yumex, there are no updates to install. When I
try to do the same with Gnome SW there are 3 updates requested (see
screenshot,. this is my current way to explain, what I mean, because
of
On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 12:11:39 -0400, Joerg Lechner wrote:
Hi,
this error disappeared after the update of today (2015-04-29). Before this
update, when I said to Gnome SW please update, the update procedure was
started as usual, and the system rebooted - I know there is a cross in the
left
On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 15:54:04 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
Error: Transaction check error:
file /usr/bin/kcm-touchpad-list-devices from install of
plasma-desktop-5.3.0-1.fc22.x86_64 conflicts with file from package
kcm_touchpad-5.1.95-1.fc22.x86_64
Anybody sees this too?
Clearly an
On Tue, 28 Apr 2015 04:44:42 -0400 (EDT), Kamil Paral wrote:
I'm facing an issue with F22 where notifications in GNOME Shell seem to
survive a shutdown/reboot. Eventually I notice there are notifications,
and when I look them up, they are about events from the previous day,
for example.
On Tue, 28 Apr 2015 16:38:00 +0200, Łukasz Posadowski wrote:
W dniu 27.04.2015 o 23:17, Michael Schwendt pisze:
Another strange issue with F22. I bootet and the offline update procedure
started (without me having started it knowingly). When done, it said it
would shutdown after updates
On Tue, 28 Apr 2015 09:06:35 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
Software and dnf use separate metadata caches and refresh schedules,
so this kind of mismatch is not unusual (though it does seem to always
surprise people).
How would that explain it? I did enter a notification about updates
being
I'm facing an issue with F22 where notifications in GNOME Shell seem to
survive a shutdown/reboot. Eventually I notice there are notifications,
and when I look them up, they are about events from the previous day,
for example.
Something similar to You may unplug the drive, and it has been
Another strange issue with F22. I bootet and the offline update procedure
started (without me having started it knowingly). When done, it said it
would shutdown after updates, and it really turnt off the machine instead
of rebooting.
What has happened there? Is this configurable?
--
test mailing
On Sun, 26 Apr 2015 09:40:21 -0400 (EDT), Robert P. J. Day wrote:
after morning update from testing updates, gnome-control-center
fails to start:
Apr 26 09:26:49 localhost gnome-control-center.desktop:
gnome-control-center: error while loading shared libraries:
libwbclient.so.0: cannot
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-6615/xulrunner-37.0.2-1.fc21,firefox-37.0.2-1.fc21
[ https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-6615 ]
It is still not found in the updates-testing repo despite bodhi's comment
that it has been pushed on 2015-04-22 22:47:23.
The
On Thu, 23 Apr 2015 11:56:19 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
Hi F22 testers,
anybody knows a trick to get vlc running in F22? I tried to install the
F21 version, but this failed:
dnf install vlc vlc-core
Error: package vlc-core-2.2.1-2.fc21.x86_64 requires
libfreerdp-cache.so.1.2()(64bit),
Does this work as intended?
I had enabled Automatic Login in GNOME Shell Users settings.
Then, when logging out, the system is stuck at an unusable virtual
console. Nothing happens. All I can do is switch to another console
and reinit runlevel 5 to get a GNOME session again.
--
test mailing
On Fri, 27 Mar 2015 16:17:55 +0100, Joachim Backes wrote:
Hi all F22 testers,
how to install gnome-session-properties? The manpage of gnome-session
has a SEE ALSO reference to gnome-session-properties(1).
It is no more since F21 already.
# yum --releasever 21 whatprovides
[Disclaimer: I've looked up the spelling of artefacts, and it's the British
English spelling I had learned. artifacts would be American English.]
After logging in on the GDM screen (not when using auto-login!), before
GNOME Shell is started small coloured rectangles appear at the bottom
of the
Meanwhile, I've filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1204387
There's no real solution yet. Just an udev customization I can use to
make the F22 default GNOME Shell mouse pointer speed work better for me
(i.e. keep the setting's slider at the middle instead of having to move
it to the very left
On Sun, 15 Mar 2015 09:40:52 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
Everybody happy with mouse pointer movement in F22?
By default, it moved much too fast for me compared with F21 and
older and other OSs. Decreasing the speed, I felt it necessary to
switch to almost the very left (slow), but
On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 21:07:19 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
On 3/20/15, Kamil Paral wrote:
We need to let those
hundreds or thousands of people running with updates-testing to install it
as well, and give it the invisible thumbs up, which is not present in bodhi,
but which is expressed
On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 04:55:34 -0400 (EDT), Kamil Paral wrote:
Just one note -
A great one, IMO!
the number of people giving karma is not the same as the
number of people actually using that proposed package build. For example,
some of system-critical libraries don't usually receive too much
On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 09:44:27 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
I think it can be a judgement call on certain packages. For example, I
maintain the Review Board packages which almost never get karma from
more than one person (and that usually only for whichiver Fedora or
EPEL branch that
Can we please fix those people, who hate bodhi so much that they
feel the need to submit updates with a low karma: 1 threshold?
It just doesn't work and causes breakage too often. Broken dependencies
and/or breakage at runtime.
Keep in mind that it takes some time for packages to be picked up
by
Everybody happy with mouse pointer movement in F22?
By default, it moved much too fast for me compared with F21 and older
and other OSs. Decreasing the speed, I felt it necessary to switch
to almost the very left (slow), but the pointer still cannot be moved
as accurately as before. What's up?
--
On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 07:32:05 +, James Hogarth wrote:
It is a package you need to download from http://www.rpmfusion.org
Look for target rawhide in the list.
--
Unfortunately that won't work for the moment as they still have not
branched for the last ... If you look at the dist tag
On Tue, 10 Mar 2015 12:52:52 -0400, Joerg Lechner wrote:
Hi,
while I was trying to install VLC player on F22 RC3 I recognized, that I have
on a new install of F22 RC3
no package rpmfusion, I have had this package in F21 and the prior Fedora
versions.
Will it come with F22 Beta or later?
On Sun, 08 Mar 2015 19:59:57 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
GNOME Software was the default (and only installed) graphical software
manager in Fedora Workstation 21, and it's the same in Fedora
Workstation 22. Its design and behaviour hasn't changed in any notable
way.
I would be careful
On Sat, 7 Mar 2015 13:56:22 -0500, Joerg Lechner wrote:
I don't know how to express correctly in computer English. As I used YUM
previously from Fxx to F21, for installation of YUM I went
to the software tool in Gnome, put into the search line yum and then
install. Afterwards there
was
On Thu, 05 Mar 2015 18:08:31 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
Hey folks! 22 Alpha RC3 (which is more or less what we were planning
for RC1, just hit a couple of bumps on the way) is still composing,
but the live images are done and can be found here:
On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 10:55:53 -0500 (EST), Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
At the Fedora 22 Alpha Go/No-Go Meeting #2 that just occurred, it was
agreed to Go with the Fedora 22 Alpha by Fedora QA, Release Engineering
and Development.
Fedora 22 Alpha will be publicly available on Tuesday, March 10,
On Fri, 12 Dec 2014 12:16:34 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
Awesome, so now you have me running a test install of F20 with R just
to see what happens in this situation. There's certainly no other way I
could be using my damn morning.
Well, the problems are real. Unresolvable deps in many
On Sat, 13 Dec 2014 11:48:00 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
updates. And quality ensurance needs to start somewhere. We can't dump
Typo here: make that quality assurance
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On Sat, 13 Dec 2014 11:51:02 +0100, drago01 wrote:
So how about:
1) Add epoch: N to all FN packages
2) Ignore people complaining about epoch being ugly
3) FN+1 FN is always the case because of 1
4) Profit
;)
That sounds like the years old Dist Epoch proposal, where a new epoch
would
On Fri, 12 Dec 2014 00:12:37 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
I haven't seen a single person report a dep issue of this nature, and I
spent most of release day in #fedora, and have been following G+,
forum, and various news site feedback since.
Violated upgrade path issues still hit users. One
On Fri, 12 Dec 2014 08:58:02 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2014-12-12 at 11:00 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 12 Dec 2014 00:12:37 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
I haven't seen a single person report a dep issue of this nature,
and I spent most of release day
On Sun, 7 Dec 2014 02:15:56 + (UTC), Andre Robatino wrote:
I have a Samsung ML-1740 laser printer which in F20 and below would work
immediately after install, even though splix wasn't installed. I believe it
was necessary for foomatic to be installed, and in one previous release it
wasn't
On Wed, 03 Dec 2014 12:41:41 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
Nothing's broken. Fedora 21 is not yet released. There's no reasonable
expectation that upgrades should work perfectly at this point. An issue
Are you kidding?
Fedora 21 -- when released -- will be affected by the problem in the same
On Thu, 04 Dec 2014 02:25:21 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
How are you supposed to build
a perfectly legitimate minor version update for all three
currently-supported releases at the same time, with that rule?
_At the same time_!
Publish the minor version _test_ updates for all the releases
On Thu, 04 Dec 2014 03:35:20 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 12:12 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 04 Dec 2014 02:25:21 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
How are you supposed to build
a perfectly legitimate minor version update for all three
currently
On Thu, 04 Dec 2014 10:18:39 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
It seems like you're expecting a post-release quality experience for
people testing pre-releases.
Nah, just the possibility to _upgrade_ to F21 pre-release with less risk
of running into broken deps or a clearly violated upgrade path.
On Wed, 03 Dec 2014 08:07:10 -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
fedup gave me the following warnings:
kde-runtime-libs-4.14.3-2.fc20.x86_64 requires exiv2-
libs-0.23-5.fc20.x86_64,
OpenEXR-libs-1.7.1-6.fc20.x86_64, libgcrypt-1.5.3-2.fc20.x86_64,
ilmbase-1.0.3-7.fc20.x86_64,
On Wed, 03 Dec 2014 10:45:29 -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
So basically, update f20-f21 is just broken, if you want kde.
Which is because the same updates have been published for F20 already,
whereas the corresponding builds for F21 are still in updates-testing.
This is something that has never
On Wed, 03 Dec 2014 11:54:06 -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
I don't want to use updates-testing indiscriminatly, because there's no
telling
what that will drag in.
Updates-testing isn't as bad as you may think.
Actually, all Fedora users ought to take a look at updates-testing regularly
and
On Tue, 02 Dec 2014 15:35:02 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
Works fine for mejust took nearly 2 minutes to come back with the
packages that I've installed from testing.
inst. RPMS: wireshark-1.10.11-1.fc20.x86_64 - Network traffic analyzer
(installed 0 days ago)
:
1 - 100 of 526 matches
Mail list logo
