Hi,
Apparently, fc33 contains a broken package dependency
On fc33:
# dnf install fedora-icon-theme
Last metadata expiration check: 3:52:18 ago on Mon 26 Oct 2020 11:29:53
AM CET.
Error:
Problem: conflicting requests
- nothing provides gnome-themes needed by
Hi,
I have been trying to test
Fedora-Workstation-Live-i386-26-*.n.0.iso
Unfortunately, all attempts in recent weeks hang with this boot message:
...
[...] A start job is running for dev-map...\x2drv.device
Q: Which component is issuing this message?
I just filed a BZ against device-mapper,
On 03/02/2017 12:27 PM, Joerg Lechner wrote:
Hi,
investigation of the first action point: "dnf update" takes too much
time in F25.
I made timestamps by my watch not by the system.
start of dnf update 09:48
...
update finished at 10:37
Question: Are these update times ok, tolerable,
On 02/20/2017 05:16 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2017-02-20 at 16:38 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 02/20/2017 03:20 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 2017-02-19 at 09:07 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
So as there was a successful Rawhide compose today,
what's there now (allowing
On 02/20/2017 03:20 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 2017-02-19 at 09:07 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
So as there was a successful Rawhide compose today,
what's there now (allowing for mirror sync) has changed since yesterday
and the updated dnf is there.
Sorry, I was wrong about this, I
On 02/19/2017 02:13 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 2017-02-18 at 05:43 +, Russel Winder wrote:
This has been happening for a while now. Given that dnf is so critical
to updating Rawhide I would not have expected this to be the case.
It was in fact fixed a while ago (as Viorel
On 11/10/2016 02:43 AM, Fedora compose checker wrote:
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 2/101 (x86_64), 3/17 (i386)
New failures (same test did not fail in 25 RC 1.1):
ID: 47037 Test: i386 Workstation-live-iso install_default
URL:
On 10/04/2016 05:51 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Recently several reports of people getting 'duplicated packages' and
'kernel updates not working' have come through to us in QA from Fedora
24 users. I managed to get one reporter to explain more specifically
what happened, and it sounds a lot like
On 05/22/2016 06:47 AM, Felix Miata wrote:
Peter G. composed on 2016-05-21 22:01 (UTC-0+00):
Without it, I might not have been able to recognize or view
the kernel crash output this morning h/t
I sure hope we can get this fixed :-) Whatever broke it
happened after f23, since it worked
On 09/06/2015 08:31 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 2015-09-05 at 23:28 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
In my understanding, this bug resembles quite bit to what I am
observing
with Fc22 on a Lenovo Flex-2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1189107
I haven't tried fc23
On 09/05/2015 10:14 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 2015-09-05 at 21:38 +0200, Giulio 'juliuxpigface' wrote:
Hi folks.
Sorry if I write this mail, but there is a bug which might
potentially
be serious enough to be a nasty blocker - at least in my opinion -.
The link is this:
On 08/19/2015 03:05 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 21:36:11 -0500,
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
I have been getting rsync errors from dl.fedoraproject.org since this
morning.
Things are working again this morning.
Right now,
* mirrors.fedoraproject.org seems
On 05/29/2015 10:27 PM, Gavin Flower wrote:
The system should ALWAYS be in UTC (also known as GMT)!
It should NEVER be changed to local time.
You are ignoring the fact, that other OSes require the RTC to be set to
local time and do *NOT SUPPORT* RTC set to UTC.
= Fedora cannot avoid having
On 05/26/2015 04:48 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
This thread is lacking a bit in clarity as to what symptoms you all are
seeing, and what the circumstances are.
Cf. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1224597
Which more details do you need?
Ralf
--
test mailing list
On 05/24/2015 04:44 PM, Ronal B Morse wrote:
On 05/24/2015 12:05 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
[1] In xfce, try Settings-Xfce Theme Manager-Icons
Ralf, in the Nautilus window running on Gnome, click on the middle
button on the right side of the upper panel (nine dots). There is a
slider control
On 05/24/2015 05:57 PM, Kalev Lember wrote:
On 05/24/2015 05:32 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 05/24/2015 04:44 PM, Ronal B Morse wrote:
On 05/24/2015 12:05 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
[1] In xfce, try Settings-Xfce Theme Manager-Icons
Ralf, in the Nautilus window running on Gnome, click
On 05/24/2015 07:40 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 05/23/2015 07:31 PM, Joachim Backes wrote:
On 05/23/2015 06:43 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Hi,
in fc22, I am observing unreasonably oversized directory icons
(256x256?) in nautilus, much bigger than file icons (64x64?).
How to change this?
Ralf
On 05/24/2015 08:50 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
Perhaps what you described is an additional (nautilus) problem.
Probably. My issue looks different (C.f. attachment; Fedora icon theme
w/ nautilus under xfce).
I guess, what I am facing are part of xfce/Gnome interoperability
issues. AFAIS,
Hi,
in fc22, I am observing unreasonably oversized directory icons
(256x256?) in nautilus, much bigger than file icons (64x64?).
How to change this?
Ralf
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On 05/23/2015 05:33 PM, Russel Winder wrote:
I switched from yum to dnf, and now have managed to stop typing yum :-)
However, I have a collection of packages that are not upgrading, I
assume due to dependencies not being satisfied. With Yum I could find
out what the dependencies were, but I do
On 05/23/2015 07:31 PM, Joachim Backes wrote:
On 05/23/2015 06:43 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Hi,
in fc22, I am observing unreasonably oversized directory icons
(256x256?) in nautilus, much bigger than file icons (64x64?).
How to change this?
Ralf
I asked this question already in the early
On 05/15/2015 10:51 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2015-05-14 at 08:31 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 05/08/2015 02:32 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Hi,
I just gave fedup a try and found myself confronted with this:
# yum update
...
The situation has worsened:
,,,
WARNING: potential
On 05/08/2015 02:32 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Hi,
I just gave fedup a try and found myself confronted with this:
# yum update
...
The situation has worsened:
,,,
WARNING: potential problems with upgrade
4:texlive-luatex-bin-svn31084.0-7.1.20140525_r34255.fc21.x86_64 (no
replacement
On 05/11/2015 09:09 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:
Hi,
I just gave fedup a try and found myself confronted with this:
# yum update
...
# fedup --network 22
...
WARNING: potential problems with upgrade
sqlitebrowser-3.5.1-1.fc21.x86_64 (replaced by
sqlitebrowser-3.6.0-1.fc22.x86_64) requires
On 05/08/2015 04:57 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 05/08/2015 06:32 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Hi,
I just gave fedup a try and found myself confronted with this:
# yum update
...
# fedup --network 22
...
WARNING: potential problems with upgrade
sqlitebrowser-3.5.1-1.fc21.x86_64 (replaced
On 04/23/2015 07:32 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2015-04-23 at 05:48 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Hi,
I would like to nominate this dnf-bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1214538
as a release blocker.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process
Hi,
I would like to nominate this dnf-bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1214538
as a release blocker.
ATM, this issue deterministically happens on my only fc22-test system.
Ralf
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
On 12/08/2014 08:26 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2014-12-08 at 07:36 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Just for the purpose of testing upgrade.img, you can simply enable
updates-testing if it turns out you have a situation like this and you
need a package from u-t to make the upgrade package
On 12/04/2014 06:43 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 06:16 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Untrue. All you need to do is to apply the after release update policy.
I.e.: push updates to updates on both Fedora(N) and Fedora(N+1). When
you need to cut a snapshot, move Fedora(N+1
On 12/03/2014 05:54 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
What is needed here, is an option to yum to use updates-testing _only_ to solve
broken deps.
This would be playing with symptoms. What we need is a fix to the Fedora
release process. It simply is broken and has always been broken, ever
since Fedora
On 12/03/2014 09:41 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2014-12-03 at 18:21 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 12/03/2014 05:54 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
What is needed here, is an option to yum to use updates-testing _only_ to solve
broken deps.
This would be playing with symptoms. What we need
On 11/17/2014 06:19 PM, Mike Chambers wrote:
Have a few issues that are now having, but think they are all related..
Had a desktop (using as mini server) that was running Fedora 20. I used
yum to upgrade to latest on F21, both main and testing repos, and
upgraded without a hitch (no errors
On 09/10/2014 08:24 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 12:32 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
possibly admitting my ignorance, but why does installing
perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker drag in systemtap-sdt-devel? i see no logical
connection, and i don't even have any systemtap packages
On 02/27/2014 08:56 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 08:25 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 02/27/2014 08:08 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 07:10 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 02/27/2014 06:43 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Feb 26, 2014, at 9:24 AM, Neal
On 02/27/2014 06:43 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Feb 26, 2014, at 9:24 AM, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote:
sudo journalctl --verify
all say 'PASS'
OK good news. It looks like some sort of throttling by rsyslogd. I'm vaguely
curious if it's some runaway/annoyed process is dumping a lot
On 02/27/2014 08:08 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 07:10 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 02/27/2014 06:43 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Feb 26, 2014, at 9:24 AM, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote:
sudo journalctl --verify
all say 'PASS'
OK good news. It looks like some
On 02/23/2014 12:14 PM, drago01 wrote:
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 8:15 AM, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
On 02/22/2014 07:34 PM, drago01 wrote:
And running tests at build time is a kludge anyway building has
nothing to do with testing.
Well, a lot of people will disagree
On 02/23/2014 03:33 AM, Felix Miata wrote:
On 2014-02-22 18:49 (GMT-0700) Chris Murphy composed:
This crappy partioning GUI in the installer is does not give me the
amount of control on partitioning desired by me.
I don't understand this. It's the most capable GUI partitioner + OS
installer
On 02/22/2014 07:34 PM, drago01 wrote:
And running tests at build time is a kludge anyway building has
nothing to do with testing.
Well, a lot of people will disagree with this claim.
Testing as part of building (running a package's testsuite) can cover a
lot of cases, but is a subset of
On 02/21/2014 05:43 PM, Nikos Roussos wrote:
On February 21, 2014 4:51:52 PM EET, Alexander Todorov atodo...@redhat.com
wrote:
На 21.02.2014 16:27, Richard W.M. Jones написа:
Is it correct that you're only going to be filing bugs when upstream
tarballs already contain test suites, but they
On 02/03/2014 01:34 AM, poma wrote:
What's the better way to deal with this phenomenon?
The first step would be to build verbose such that you see where the
error actually occurs.
…
Making all in api
make[4]: Entering directory
On 12/18/2013 09:03 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Hi folks! can people please test and up-karma
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libreoffice-4.1.4.2-1.fc20 ? LO
is currently newer in F19 stable than F20 stable, and it's causing some
weird dep issues when people try to yum distro-sync to F20.
On 12/18/2013 02:58 PM, Bob Lightfoot wrote:
On 12/18/2013 08:35 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Because Ralf foo-1.0.fc18.rpm ; foo-1.0.fc19.rpm ; foo-1.0.fc20.rpm
are considered 3 separate packages and each must be reviewed and moved
to stable. Depending on resources foo-1.0.fc18.rpm might reach
On 12/18/2013 08:03 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2013-12-18 at 15:03 +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
Hi,
i just booted the live iso in a VM with 1G of memory and after I start
Software the VM locks up completely after a few seconds. Having top
open while starting Software shows very
On 12/16/2013 11:38 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
I'm still scratching my head over the other applications not
saving/restoring correctly,
Next probably genuine xfce bug: thunar File Manager windows do not get
restored to their position they had carried before.
Bug filed:
On 12/18/2013 08:12 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Dec 17, 2013, at 11:37 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote:
Yeah I just did an F18 live desktop install to kvm, installed 0.7.3-4, ran it
with:
fedup --network 20 --debuglog fedupdebug.log
The download is fine. The grub.cfg is
On 12/16/2013 11:38 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
I'm still scratching my head over the other applications not
saving/restoring correctly, but xfce4-terminal at least is fixed in an
update I just pushed.
Thanks for taking care about this issue.
Testing and karma welcome:
On 12/14/2013 06:14 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 12/13/2013 05:48 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 17:04:01 +0100
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
When re-loggin in,
- sometimes, *all* saved apps appear on virtual workspace 1,
plastered on top of each other.
Some more
On 12/14/2013 06:20 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Also, from re-reading the info in this thread, in addition to the
xfce4-terminal bug, it sounds like perhaps recently all gnome based
stuff isn't saving at all?
(liferea, gnome-terminal, etc)
I wonder if something changed recently in gtk3 session
On 12/13/2013 04:09 PM, nonamedotc wrote:
I believe this happened before recently - XFCE does not remember
sessions anymore. I tried clearing the ~/.cache/sessions/* and
restarting the system - this does not affect the behavior in any way.
Is anyone else seeing this?
Yes, I am. Both under F19
On 12/13/2013 05:48 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 17:04:01 +0100
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
On 12/13/2013 04:09 PM, nonamedotc wrote:
I believe this happened before recently - XFCE does not remember
sessions anymore. I tried clearing the ~/.cache/sessions
Hi,
I am facing a weird issue on an f20 test system:
During a yum update in an attempt to update this machine from the status
ca. a week ago to today's, a message appears:
# yum update
...
systemd-journald[...]: Received request to flush runtime journal from
PID 1
[hangs]
After this
On 12/11/2013 03:04 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 12/11/2013 01:50 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Received request to flush runtime journal from PID 1
With limited info it could be the kernel or it could simply be short on
space on /var ?
No. Though this is a small RAM and small disk
On 10/18/2013 09:28 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
Never mind. It seems that mirror probably hadn't been synced yet
Though this likely is true, it means Fedora's mirrormanager doesn't work
properly.
Ralf
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
On 09/24/2013 10:25 AM, Jan Wildeboer wrote:
That said, I regret having to tell you that your plan is dumb, naive, and far
from being workable.
That said, I regret having to tell you that insulting the OP instead of
pointing out relevant arguments is dumb, naive and far from being
On 09/23/2013 11:49 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
Greetings you all
After bit of irc discussion there is a compelling reason to move
entirely away from Red Hat bugzilla as well as away from concept of
hosting our own.
Now it pretty much boils down to this.
1. Generic attitude of many
On 09/24/2013 03:45 AM, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 09:49:23PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
After bit of irc discussion there is a compelling reason to move
entirely away from Red Hat bugzilla as well as away from concept of
hosting our own.
...
Thoughts and
On 08/15/2013 04:32 PM, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
Compose started at Thu Aug 15 08:15:02 UTC 2013
Broken deps for i386
--
[FlightGear]
[fgrun]
Fallout of the OpenSceneGraph upgrade.
Now fixed in rawhide.
Ralf
--
test mailing list
On 06/11/2013 07:46 PM, Richard Vickery wrote:
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R
c...@omen.com wrote:
It seems the name of the Fedora 19 release is getting corrupted in various
places.
It might be breaking some scripts as well.
It might be wise to eliminate the
On 06/03/2013 02:43 PM, Frank McCormick wrote:
On 06/03/2013 01:09 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 19:14 -0400, Frank McCormick wrote:
Doesn't work. Erased the offending files and re installed but
ldconfig
still complains about the truncated file.
And what is the
On 05/08/2013 04:29 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 06:25 +0400, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
Yes. I have internet. I think that mock hasn't /etc/resolv.conf..
I don't think Fedora packages are supposed to require external network
access to be built.
In general, you can't access a
On 01/07/2013 01:16 PM, Lawrence Graves wrote:
Nvidia drivers aren't working with the new kernel update.
What doesn't work for you?
I am having severe issues with both nvidia's drivers on both fc17 and
fc18 in combination with Xfce:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883875
On 12/20/2012 11:11 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 16:53 -0500, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
There are updates available for imsettings. But, something is messed up
with a dependency problem.
This means that you cannot update a current F18beta.
This means that an install fails
On 12/20/2012 11:46 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 12/20/2012 09:03 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
For whatever reason Anaconda generates a separate file system for /tmp
using an arbitrary size. One one machine it is about 4GB, causing
Brasero
to fail on larger jobs. Meanwhile
On 12/22/2012 08:22 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 2012-12-22 at 08:15 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 12/20/2012 11:46 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 12/20/2012 09:03 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
For whatever reason Anaconda generates a separate file system for /tmp
using
On 11/24/2012 07:53 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 2012-11-24 at 05:20 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
d) hard and difficult to reproduce
you're _really_ going to have to include logs.
No luck, yet. So far, I have always found myself with a shredded
partition, but haven't found indication
On 11/23/2012 12:32 PM, Sergio wrote:
--- Em sex, 23/11/12, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R c...@omen.com escreveu:
De: Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R c...@omen.com
Assunto: Yum update chnages BIOS setting
Para: Fedora test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Data: Sexta-feira, 23 de Novembro de 2012, 6:50
I
On 11/24/2012 04:32 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2012-11-23 at 16:44 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 11/23/2012 12:32 PM, Sergio wrote:
--- Em sex, 23/11/12, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R c...@omen.com escreveu:
De: Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R c...@omen.com
Assunto: Yum update
On 05/06/2012 02:52 AM, Rob Healey wrote:
Greetings:
Could someone tell me which is more appropriate to do? place project
manual files in:
1) usr/share/man/lang/man1/gramps.1.gz, or
2) /usr/local/share/man/man1/gramps.1
Each man page should accompany the program it documents.
i.e. if a
On 04/27/2012 02:11 PM, Matthias Runge wrote:
I wonder how different a run-time test-suite dffers from a test suite to
be executed during build.
There are 2 major differences:
1. The package-to-test itself is not installed to its final destination.
2. A testsuite being run in %check has
On 01/31/2012 09:00 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 11:43 -0500, Chris Lumens wrote:
The installed system must run normally if the user chooses to install without
SELinux
There is no test case for this now.
I have one note on this. There is used noselinux option, but it
On 04/27/2011 07:13 PM, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
On 04/27/2011 06:01 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 04/27/2011 05:04 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 09:52 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 04/27/2011 07:14 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 06:56 +0200, Ralf Corsepius
On 04/27/2011 10:21 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 04/27/2011 03:52 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 04/27/2011 07:14 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 06:56 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Fedora, as a volunteeer effort, cannot.
It's worse. I fear Fedora will loose contributors, because
On 04/27/2011 05:04 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 09:52 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 04/27/2011 07:14 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 06:56 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Fedora, as a volunteeer effort, cannot.
It's worse. I fear Fedora will loose
On 04/26/2011 05:23 PM, Gerald Henriksen wrote:
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 03:43:55 + (UTC), you wrote:
Why did Fedora decide to abandon Gnome 2, instead of offering Gnome 3 as
an experimental college-level project via a spin (as one poster here already
asked), representing a work-in-progress
On 04/07/2011 02:57 PM, James Laska wrote:
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 07:06 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Anything else to consider?
I am not sure what you are aim at.
I'm looking for some quick/basic ideas we can turn into test cases on
the wiki anchored at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On 04/01/2011 11:42 AM, Adam Pribyl wrote:
Running yum update in F15 shows me messages like this:
--- Package upower.i686 0:0.9.8-3.fc15 will be aktualizaci
--- Package upower.i686 0:0.9.9-1.fc15 will be an update
--- Package usbmuxd.i686 0:1.0.6-2.fc15 will be aktualizaci
--- Package
On 03/30/2011 07:07 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
Hi,
I'm running F15 with gnome-shell.
Having the following effect: after having entered the login password, it
takes about 10-15 secs until the session is running and the gnome-shell
panel appears at the desktop's top. For me, that extreme long:
On 07/07/2010 09:22 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
hi,
I'm using a Seagate USB hard drive which is divided into 3 partitions, 2
ext3 and one NTFS. There is new very weird behavior when it comes to
directories in the /media folder.
The partition names are:
Ankur_backup, Stuff, NTFS Temp
at times
79 matches
Mail list logo
