On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 10:01:41 -0800
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R c...@omen.com wrote:
Option 2 has already been tried. The old motherboard was checked
with memtest86+ before being placed in service running omen.com.
Maybe use an out of box solution:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 09:18:40AM -0800, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
Recently I discovered the motherboard that had been running omen.com
had an undetected bad memory chip. This is a real confidence builder.
Currently, running a definitive memory test requires hours of down time.
2013/1/18 Justin M. Forbes jmfor...@linuxtx.org
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 09:18:40AM -0800, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R
wrote:
Recently I discovered the motherboard that had been running omen.com
had an undetected bad memory chip. This is a real confidence builder.
Currently, running a
2013/1/18 Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com
On Fri, 2013-01-18 at 20:49 +0200, cornel panceac wrote:
2013/1/18 Justin M. Forbes jmfor...@linuxtx.org
There are a lof of reasons that this isn't feasible on a
running system.
You just don't have access to all of the
On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 09:18:40 -0800
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R c...@omen.com wrote:
Recently I discovered the motherboard that had been running omen.com
had an undetected bad memory chip. This is a real confidence
builder.
Currently, running a definitive memory test requires hours of
