On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 10:33:04AM +0100, Thomas Esser wrote:
> > The following patch is probably needed for teTeX 2.0.2 (2.0.1 was OK):
>
> Oops... Thanks for the quick reply. I'll try to replace that immediately
> "in place", i.e. by updating the tetex-src-2.0.2.tar.gz file (hoping
> that not to
On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 12:41:26PM +0300, Dmitry Sivachenko wrote:
> There is also a file
> texmf/doc/help/Catalogue/entries/g-brief.html
> which was probably intended to be removed (I am not sure though).
No, that is ok. The Catalogue lists lots of packages. Not all of them
are available in teTeX
Hello!
The following patch is probably needed for teTeX 2.0.2 (2.0.1 was OK):
--- texconfig.orig Sat Mar 1 09:01:38 2003
+++ texconfig Sat Mar 1 08:59:34 2003
@@ -1791,7 +1791,7 @@
test -z "$TC_DFT_CONFIG_PS" && TC_DFT_CONFIG_PS=$TC_TEXMFMAIN/dvips/config/config.ps
: ${TC_DFT_DVIPDF
texconfig should no longer try to call "fmtutil --byfmt mfw". Doing
so gives
fmtutil: no info for format `mfw'
(but does not cause any harm).
The following patch fixes this.
Thomas
--- 2.0.2/texk/tetex/texconfig Sat Mar 1 10:13:18 2003
+++ texk/tetex/texconfigSat Mar 1 16:05:23 2003
