Hi,
Already there is.
http://kuuku.no.coocan.jp/pub/musixtex/musixvbm/index-e.html
All comments are welcome.
Regards,
Hiroaki
- Original Message -
> From:
> To: "'Werner Icking Music Archive'"
> Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 08:51:38 -0700
> Subject: Re: [Tex-music] strange beam
Long long ago, Stanislav Kneifl and Hiroaki Morimotu separately created two
different postscript slur packages intended to remedy similar issues to
those we're now discussing with beams. Wouldn't it be great if someone (with
a lot more MusiXTeX and postscript knowledge that I have) were to create
>|Jean-Pierre: If I increase the zoom to 500%, I can see a
>|discontinuity using the most recent dvips but it's less
>|pronounced.
And if I zoom into the dvi, I see the same discontinuity. So
the problem *is* in musixtex but can be exacerbated by an
old dvips. Sigh.
Bob
Jean-Pierre: If I increase the zoom to 500%, I can see a
discontinuity using the most recent dvips but it's less
pronounced.
Bob
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
On Wed, 12 May 2021, Bob Tennent wrote:
Jean-Pierre: There is a discontinuity between L and M in
your PDF (generated using dvips from 2013) but not if I
process your source using the most recent dvips (2021.1).
BTW, your example source file inputs musixtex.tex twice.
Thanks for both topics
>|Does everybody see a gap between J and F and an overlap between M and L in
>|the 16th notes?
>|
>|The problem in the same in the PostScript file but it is not present
>|in the
>|dvi file.
Jean-Pierre: There is a discontinuity between L and M in
your PDF (generated using dvips from 2013)
6 matches
Mail list logo
