2015-02-03 10:10 GMT+02:00 David Allsopp dra-n...@metastack.com:
Out of curiosity, why can't they simply be renamed (e.g. musixcurly
and musixtuplet, or something?) and given proper headers like other
MusiXTeX modules?
MK's original posting had no filename. It consisted of lines of TeX code
Bob Tennent wrote:
Dear all: I propose to incorporate the definitions in these extension
libraries into musixtex.tex. The reason is that Karl Berry, ever-vigilant
for possible file-name clashes in TeXLive, feels the file names are too
generic and I've only been allowed to put them into the
|That said, IANAL, but curly.tex's redefinition of
|\writ@staffs I think gives sufficient case it must be GPL
|in order to comply with MusiXTeX's licence.
Possibly. I'd prefer explicit licensing by the author.
|Out of curiosity, why can't they simply be renamed (e.g.
|musixcurly and
Dear all: I propose to incorporate the definitions in these
extension libraries into musixtex.tex. The reason is that
Karl Berry, ever-vigilant for possible file-name clashes in
TeXLive, feels the file names are too generic and I've
only been allowed to put them into the musixtex package in
the
2015-02-02 22:09 GMT+02:00 Dirk Laurie dirk.lau...@gmail.com:
2015-02-02 21:53 GMT+02:00 Bob Tennent r...@cs.queensu.ca:
[content-free reply]
Sorry about that. Twitchy fingers.
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
2015-02-02 21:53 GMT+02:00 Bob Tennent r...@cs.queensu.ca:
Dear all: I propose to incorporate the definitions in these
extension libraries into musixtex.tex. The reason is that
Karl Berry, ever-vigilant for possible file-name clashes in
TeXLive, feels the file names are too generic and I've
6 matches
Mail list logo
