On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 6:53 PM Christian Mondrup
wrote:
>
> > Works perfectly with Rodolofo's pmx file on my Mint 20 pc.
>
> But I do get an erroneous postscript file if I process the pmx file the
> traditional way:
>
> pmab etex musixflx etex dvips
>
> The dvi file appears corrupted when
Den 21.11.2022 kl. 18.27 skrev Christian Mondrup:
Den 19.11.2022 kl. 20.49 skrev Christian Mondrup:
Den 19.11.2022 kl. 20.41 skrev Rodolfo Medina:
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 7:05 PM Christian Mondrup
wrote:
Den 19.11.2022 kl. 19.43 skrev Bob Tennent:
Produces good output here. Maybe your
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 6:23 PM Agustin Martin wrote:
>
> Hi, Rodolfo,
>
> Is good old xdvi rendering your dvi file correctly? Here it seems to
> do so. It should complain if some fonts are missing.
>
> gv is not working here too, but those are known bugs
> (https://bugs.debian.org/gv) Note also
El lun, 21 nov 2022 a las 18:13, Rodolfo Medina
() escribió:
>
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 4:57 PM Agustin Martin
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi, Rodolfo,
> >
> > Is package texlive-music installed? Before installing it some fonts
> > were found missing,
> >
> > mktexpk: don't know how to create bitmap font
So you're using a distribution dvips, rather than texlive's dvips. Please
verify that you have the musixtex fonts, likely part of the texlive-music
package.
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 12:22 PM Rodolfo Medina
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 5:11 PM Bob Tennent wrote:
> >
> > Rodolfo: As has
Den 19.11.2022 kl. 20.49 skrev Christian Mondrup:
Den 19.11.2022 kl. 20.41 skrev Rodolfo Medina:
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 7:05 PM Christian Mondrup
wrote:
Den 19.11.2022 kl. 19.43 skrev Bob Tennent:
Produces good output here. Maybe your dvips binary is corrupt?
I can reproduce the error
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 5:18 PM Bob Tennent wrote:
>
> Do you have ghostscript installed?
Yes, I do.
Rodolfo
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 5:11 PM Bob Tennent wrote:
>
> Rodolfo: As has already been determined, the problem is the dvips step.
> Please do
>
> $ which dvips
>
> and if the output is
>
> /usr/local/bin/dvips
>
> do
>
> $ ls -l/usr/local/bin/dvips
>
> which should point to
Do you have ghostscript installed?
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 12:13 PM Rodolfo Medina
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 4:57 PM Agustin Martin
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi, Rodolfo,
> >
> > Is package texlive-music installed? Before installing it some fonts
> > were found missing,
> >
> > mktexpk: don't
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 4:57 PM Agustin Martin wrote:
>
> Hi, Rodolfo,
>
> Is package texlive-music installed? Before installing it some fonts
> were found missing,
>
> mktexpk: don't know how to create bitmap font for xslz20
> mktexpk: don't know how to create bitmap font for mxsk
> mktexpk:
Rodolfo: As has already been determined, the problem is the dvips step.
Please do
$ which dvips
and if the output is
/usr/local/bin/dvips
do
$ ls -l/usr/local/bin/dvips
which should point to .../texlive2022/bin/x86_64-linux/dvips
I suspect you're using a corrupt dvips.
Bob
On Mon,
El sáb, 19 nov 2022 a las 19:41, Rodolfo Medina
() escribió:
>
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 6:40 PM Bob Tennent wrote:
> >
> > Perhaps you should attach your dvi file for us.
>
> Here it is:
> ---
> TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
> If you want to unsubscribe or look at
Rodolfo: Please run musixtex -i pmx and attach all the intermediate
and log files. I run Linux Mint and don't see a problem. AFAIK, only
Christian has duplicated the problem, also on Mint I believe. We've got
to get to the bottom of this.
Bob
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 11:31 AM Rodolfo
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 4:18 PM wrote:
>
> Rodolfo wrote
>
> > What do you people suggest?
>
>
> Switch to Windows 10
>
>
>
> Seriously, did you solve the problem?
>
> --Don Simons
Unfortunately not...
Rodolfo
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to
Rodolfo wrote
>
> What do you people suggest?
>
Switch to Windows 10
Seriously, did you solve the problem?
--Don Simons
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
com)
' TeX output 2022.11.19:1817' -> bwv847_1.ps
.
[1]
It produces a perfectly fine postscript file.
--Don Simons
> -Original Message-
> From: TeX-Music
> On Behalf Of Christian Mondrup
> Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2022 11:04 AM
> To: tex-music@tug.org
>
Den 19.11.2022 kl. 20.41 skrev Rodolfo Medina:
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 7:05 PM Christian Mondrup
wrote:
Den 19.11.2022 kl. 19.43 skrev Bob Tennent:
Produces good output here. Maybe your dvips binary is corrupt?
I can reproduce the error on my linux Mint 20 station. I have tex
installed
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 7:05 PM Christian Mondrup
wrote:
>
> Den 19.11.2022 kl. 19.43 skrev Bob Tennent:
> > Produces good output here. Maybe your dvips binary is corrupt?
>
> I can reproduce the error on my linux Mint 20 station. I have tex
> installed from tug TexLive rather than from Mint
Den 19.11.2022 kl. 19.43 skrev Bob Tennent:
Produces good output here. Maybe your dvips binary is corrupt?
I can reproduce the error on my linux Mint 20 station. I have tex
installed from tug TexLive rather than from Mint package repository
dvips bach-bwv847prel_fug#2.dvi
This is dvips(k)
Produces good output here. Maybe your dvips binary is corrupt?
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 1:41 PM Rodolfo Medina
wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 6:40 PM Bob Tennent wrote:
> >
> > Perhaps you should attach your dvi file for us.
>
> Here it is:
>
---
TeX-music@tug.org
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 6:40 PM Bob Tennent wrote:
>
> Perhaps you should attach your dvi file for us.
Here it is:
bach-bwv847prel_fug#2.dvi
Description: TeX dvi file
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
Perhaps you should attach your dvi file for us.
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 1:32 PM Rodolfo Medina
wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 6:29 PM Bob Tennent wrote:
> >
> > What is the output generated by dvips bach-bwv847prel_fug#2.dvi ?
>
> It looks ok also:
>
> $ dvips bach-bwv847prel_fug#2.dvi
>
On Sat, 19 Nov 2022, Bob Tennent wrote:
What is the output generated by dvips bach-bwv847prel_fug#2.dvi ?
Hope I understand the question. dvips won't let you catch the result into
a file, typing ">result.txt"
--
Jean-Pierre Coulon---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing
Rodolfo--
Sorry about the problem. I glanced at the long stream of responses but didn't
look in detail.
I have no problem at all processing your pmx file using my standard batch file
under a windows 2000 command prompt window, which produces the postscript. The
code versions run are
PMX,
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 6:29 PM Bob Tennent wrote:
>
> What is the output generated by dvips bach-bwv847prel_fug#2.dvi ?
It looks ok also:
$ dvips bach-bwv847prel_fug#2.dvi
This is dvips(k) 2022.1 (TeX Live 2022) Copyright 2022 Radical Eye
Software (www.radicaleye.com)
' TeX output
What is the output generated by dvips bach-bwv847prel_fug#2.dvi ?
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 1:22 PM Rodolfo Medina
wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 6:15 PM Bob Tennent wrote:
> >
> > Looking at the log produced by musixtex -i, I see that musixdia.tex and
> musixper.tex are input; I don't know
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 6:15 PM Bob Tennent wrote:
>
> Looking at the log produced by musixtex -i, I see that musixdia.tex and
> musixper.tex are input; I don't know why. Is it possible you don't have
> these extension packages?
> Perhaps you should run musixtex -i and attach the log
Looking at the log produced by musixtex -i, I see that musixdia.tex and
musixper.tex are input; I don't know why. Is it possible you don't have
these extension packages?
Perhaps you should run musixtex -i and attach the log file.
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 1:09 PM Rodolfo Medina
wrote:
> On
Sorry !
On Sat, 19 Nov 2022, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 5:46 PM Jean-Pierre Coulon wrote:
Then try my dvi.
Yes, but error:
$ dvips -z bach_prelfug544_retypeset.dvi
This is dvips(k) 2022.1 (TeX Live 2022) Copyright 2022 Radical Eye
Software (www.radicaleye.com)
' TeX
Similar problem:
https://www.mail-archive.com/tex-music@tug.org/msg05513.html
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 5:48 PM Christian Mondrup
wrote:
>
> just a guess: you may be using an older version of musixflx.
Well, but no, because the problem occurs between DVI and PS, whereas
musixflx acts before.
Thanks
Rodolfo
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 5:46 PM Jean-Pierre Coulon wrote:
>
> Then try my dvi.
Yes, but error:
$ dvips -z bach_prelfug544_retypeset.dvi
This is dvips(k) 2022.1 (TeX Live 2022) Copyright 2022 Radical Eye
Software (www.radicaleye.com)
' TeX output 2022.11.08:2105' -> bach_prelfug544_retypeset.ps
Den 19.11.2022 kl. 18.27 skrev Rodolfo Medina:
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 5:04 PM Rodolfo Medina wrote:
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 4:39 PM Bob Tennent wrote:
That seems to date from 2015. Try installing from https://ctan.org/pkg/pmx
or http://icking-music-archive.org/software/pmx/pmx-2.98a.zip.
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 5:40 PM Rodolfo Medina wrote:
>
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 5:35 PM Jean-Pierre Coulon wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 19 Nov 2022, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> >
> > > Yes it is:
> >
> > Here I obtain this with the Tex distribution with Windows 10.
> >
> > Please try to convert my ps.
>
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 5:35 PM Jean-Pierre Coulon wrote:
>
> On Sat, 19 Nov 2022, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
>
> > Yes it is:
>
> Here I obtain this with the Tex distribution with Windows 10.
>
> Please try to convert my ps.
You mean convert to PDF format? I did, via ps2pdf, and it worked fine.
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 5:04 PM Rodolfo Medina wrote:
>
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 4:39 PM Bob Tennent wrote:
> >
> > That seems to date from 2015. Try installing from https://ctan.org/pkg/pmx
> > or http://icking-music-archive.org/software/pmx/pmx-2.98a.zip.
> >
> > Bob T.
>
> Thanks, I'm
Is the trouble already in the PostScript format?
Bye
--
Jean-Pierre Coulon
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 4:39 PM Bob Tennent wrote:
>
> That seems to date from 2015. Try installing from https://ctan.org/pkg/pmx
> or http://icking-music-archive.org/software/pmx/pmx-2.98a.zip.
>
> Bob T.
Thanks, I'm installing it, but I'm afraid the problem is not in the
pmxab step but in the
That seems to date from 2015. Try installing from https://ctan.org/pkg/pmx
or http://icking-music-archive.org/software/pmx/pmx-2.98a.zip.
Bob T.
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 11:34 AM Rodolfo Medina
wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 4:26 PM Bob Tennent wrote:
> >
> > Works OK here. What version of
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 4:26 PM Bob Tennent wrote:
>
> Works OK here. What version of PMX are you running?
>
> Bob T.
I think it's the one coming from and with Debian:
# aptitude install pmx
pmx is already installed at the requested version (2.7.0.ctan20150301-4)
pmx is already installed at
Works OK here. What version of PMX are you running?
Bob T.
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 11:12 AM Rodolfo Medina
wrote:
> Hi, dear friends:
>
> after using xml2pmx and obtaining the PMX file, I launch musixtex on
> it but get a messed PDF output. My system is a Debian Linux latest
> version.
41 matches
Mail list logo
