21:24
> An: Werner Icking Music Archive
> Betreff: Re: [Tex-music] check@staff ... specified range
>
> On Sat, 12 Aug 2023, Bob Tennent wrote:
>
> > Jean-Pierre: a better workaround is to add \toctfin before the
> > \Changecontext and \ioctfinup q immediately after, thus
===
>
> --Don
>
>
>
> From: Bob Tennent
> Sent: Saturday, August 12, 2023 9:45 AM
> To: Don Simons
> Subject: Re: [Tex-music] check@staff ... specified range
>
> Don: Can you add octaviation to match Jean-Pierre's example?
>
> Bob
>
> On Fri, Aug
On Sat, 12 Aug 2023, Bob Tennent wrote:
Jean-Pierre: a better workaround is to add \toctfin before the
\Changecontext and \ioctfinup q immediately after, thus avoiding
the cutoctline code in musixtex.tex that seems to be problematical.
Works, thanks. I just have to accept the small vertical
Jean-Pierre: a better workaround is to add \toctfin before the
\Changecontext and \ioctfinup q immediately after, thus avoiding
the cutoctline code in musixtex.tex that seems to be problematical.
Bob
On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 11:56 AM Jean-Pierre Coulon wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Aug 2023, Bob Tennent
Thanks Jean-Pierre.
I think I've found the location of the bug:
% cutoctline
\o@loop
\ifdim\o@x<\maxdimen \let\T@ii\n@ii \C@TO \o@x\z@ \fi
\repeat
in the definition of \z@suspend. Confirm by commenting out those lines (or
by removing the octaviation of the example code).
But I don't
it is interesting to compare the output message in my standard situation
and when I intentionally do the mistake of saying &\qu j|\qu j for 2nd
instrument at line 24.
--
Jean-Pierre CoulonThis is TeX, Version 3.14159265 (MiKTeX 20.6.29)
(pbstaff.tex (musixtex.tex
MusiXTeX(c) 1.24 <2017-02-28>
On Sat, 12 Aug 2023, Bob Tennent wrote:
Jean-Pierre: Can you provide an example involving \leftrepeat or
\rightrepeat (so that a change of context doesn't muddy the water)?
Bob
I have had similar cases with \leftrepeat or \rightrepeat.
--
Jean-Pierre Coulon\input musixtex
%\input
Jean-Pierre: Can you provide an example involving \leftrepeat or
\rightrepeat (so that a change of context doesn't muddy the water)?
Bob
I have had similar cases with \leftrepeat or \rightrepeat.
>
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look
On Fri, 11 Aug 2023, dsim...@roadrunner.com wrote:
However, I still don’t know exactly what image Jean-Pierre was trying to
create when he first generated the error, since he hasn’t yet provided
such an image.
I have already provided the image you obtain with \instrumentnumber1.
Now suppose
asn’t yet provided such an image.
>
>
>
> --Don
>
>
>
> *From:* TeX-Music *On
> Behalf Of *Bob Tennent
> *Sent:* Friday, August 11, 2023 2:49 PM
> *To:* Werner Icking Music Archive
> *Subject:* Re: [Tex-music] check@staff ... specified range
>
>
>
> Th
ner@tug.org> >
> On Behalf Of Jean-Pierre Coulon
> Sent: Friday, August 11, 2023 10:30 AM
> To: Werner Icking Music Archive mailto:tex-music@tug.org>
> >
> Subject: Re: [Tex-music] check@staff ... specified range
>
> On Fri, 11 Aug 2023, dsim...@roadrunn
trying to do when you generated the error.
>
> --Don
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: TeX-Music
> > On Behalf Of Jean-Pierre Coulon
> > Sent: Friday, August 11, 2023 10:30 AM
> > To: Werner Icking Music Archive
> > Subject: Re: [Tex-music] check@staff
were trying to do when you generated the error.
--Don
> -Original Message-
> From: TeX-Music
> On Behalf Of Jean-Pierre Coulon
> Sent: Friday, August 11, 2023 10:30 AM
> To: Werner Icking Music Archive
> Subject: Re: [Tex-music] check@staff ... specified range
>
On Fri, 11 Aug 2023, dsim...@roadrunner.com wrote:
Jean-Pierre, could you post a .tex file that works and shows exactly what
you want? I'm trying to reproduce whatever your problem is with a
PMX-generated file, and so far cannot recreate the problem. The following
PMX file runs fine:
If you
Jean-Pierre, could you post a .tex file that works and shows exactly what
you want? I'm trying to reproduce whatever your problem is with a
PMX-generated file, and so far cannot recreate the problem. The following
PMX file runs fine:
==
3 2 3 4 3 4 0 0
1 2 20 0
ttt
.\
AS0-
gd24
And it may help a debugger to know that replacing \xbar by \bar or \zbar or
\zzbar all fail. Good luck!
Bob
On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 11:56 AM Jean-Pierre Coulon wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Aug 2023, Bob Tennent wrote:
>
> > The following is a workaround:
> >
> > \setdoublebar%
> > \xbar%
> >
On Fri, 11 Aug 2023, Bob Tennent wrote:
The following is a workaround:
\setdoublebar%
\xbar%
\generalsignature3%
\changesignature%
This is a semi-workaround because with xbar you prenvent a linebreak where
I have one :-)
--
Jean-Pierre Coulon
---
The following is a workaround:
\setdoublebar%
\xbar%
\generalsignature3%
\changesignature%
This might help someone find the bug which seems to be deep inside
musixtex.tex and beyond my patience to track down. If you find it, let me
know and I'll make the correction.
Bob
On Fri, Aug 11, 2023
18 matches
Mail list logo
