Re: [Tex-music] little things

2017-08-21 Thread Andre Van Ryckeghem
' Subject: Re: [Tex-music] little things It's been interesting and a little frustrating looking into the 4 "features" Andre identified. Most of the frustration is from a combination of my fading memory and insufficient commenting in the PMX code, making it very difficult to reconstruct PMX'

Re: [Tex-music] little things

2017-08-20 Thread Don Simons
I wrote >... Some day I may introduce some PMX logic to get around this > restriction in cases like this, but for now I suggest simply using inline TeX to > emplace the dot with \upz, or the tenuto with \lst... Of course I should have written \ust . --Don ---

Re: [Tex-music] little things

2017-08-20 Thread Don Simons
It's been interesting and a little frustrating looking into the 4 "features" Andre identified. Most of the frustration is from a combination of my fading memory and insufficient commenting in the PMX code, making it very difficult to reconstruct PMX's internal logic. But here's where I stand on

Re: [Tex-music] little things

2017-08-15 Thread Andre Van Ryckeghem
Archive' Subject: Re: [Tex-music] little things Andre, you have nothing to be sorry about. All of these items are news to me, and could be fixed by better coding inside PMX. I'll be looking into them. But I am curious how you got your source compiled with "r8+zffi" in the first bar...I ju

Re: [Tex-music] little things

2017-08-15 Thread Don Simons
Andre, you have nothing to be sorry about. All of these items are news to me, and could be fixed by better coding inside PMX. I'll be looking into them. But I am curious how you got your source compiled with "r8+zffi" in the first bar...I just removed it. --Don > -Original Message- >