|On Sun, 19 Jun 2011, Bob Tennent wrote:
|
| If you already have a musixtex score and don't want to start again using
| pmx, you can suppress instruments as follows: [...]
|
|Could you please provide an example with 3 or 4 instruments and 3 or 4
|measures?
The original source is in
On Mon, 20 Jun 2011, Bob Tennent wrote:
|Could you please provide an example with 3 or 4 instruments and 3 or 4
|measures?
The original source is in
http://icking-music-archive.org/scores/bach/bwv988/quod.zip
Sorry, quod.tex compiles nicely, but it provides the score and doesn't include
| |Could you please provide an example with 3 or 4 instruments and 3 or 4
| |measures?
|
| The original source is in
|
| http://icking-music-archive.org/scores/bach/bwv988/quod.zip
|
|Sorry, quod.tex compiles nicely, but it provides the score and doesn't
|include
|the \def\vnotes... of
On Mon, 20 Jun 2011, Bob Tennent wrote:
The example was in the rest of the message (after the _... ).
Sorry I thought the rest of the message was identical to quod.tex. Now I
obtain the Alto part. How can I switch to another part?
--
Jean-Pierre Coulon
|Now I
|obtain the Alto part. How can I switch to another part?
For example, to get the S part, change #4 to #5 on the right of the \def\vnotes
and adjust the \setname1 and \setclef1 accordingly.
Bob
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or
On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 06:46 -0400, Bob Tennent wrote:
|On Sun, 19 Jun 2011, Bob Tennent wrote:
|
| If you already have a musixtex score and don't want to start again using
| pmx, you can suppress instruments as follows: [...]
|
|Could you please provide an example with 3 or 4
Bob Tennent wrote
Note that the other parts are indeed suppressed, but the note spacing
has to be corrected in the resulting part score. Also multiple-bar
rests.
ALL OF WHICH ARE DONE AUTOMATICALLY BY PMX!!! Plus, all info is stored in
one file and that's all you have to correct if you find a
|Neat; it works!
|
|But what would you change to print one of the other three parts instead?
|(Yes, I am treating this as a magic incantation of which I understand
|little, and yes, I do feel like the sorcer's apprentice.)
Answered in a previous post. But here's a brief explanation:
|
Sorry this crossed in the mail with Jean-Pierr Coulon asking the same
question and Bob Tennent answering it.
On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 10:32 -0400, Terrence Enger wrote:
Neat; it works!
But what would you change to print one of the other three parts instead?
(Yes, I am treating this as a magic
Greetings,
I know from Noack Typsetting music with PMX -- version 2.6 that
I am not supposed to put the code for a dynamic mark in front of a
note. Still, a segmentation fault seems like an overly severe punishment
for a coding error.
I append the PMX souce and the console output (lightly
Terry, glad to see you bit the bullet and started doing this in PMX. I think
in the end it'll save you lots of effort.
I'll look into trapping that sort of error in a more graceful fashion. FYI,
when I compile it with pmx2610 in Windows XT SP2, I get no errors or faults
at all; it just doesn't
11 matches
Mail list logo
