Hi,
I have a modeling problem with hairpins.
The following PMX code:
==
% nstaves ninstr mtrnuml mtrdenl mtrnump mtrdenp
114444
% npickup nkeys
00
% npages nsystems musicsize fracindent
011 20 0.05
t
.\
w100pt
Tt
2016-01-01 12:27 GMT+02:00 Dieter :
>
> a04 D< D< | /
> a04 D> | /
...
> Is this the recommended modeling or are there alternatives?
Look at the TeX file generated by PMX. You will see
\hpstrt10\hpcend100
Experiment with the parameters. When you get the result
right,
> 2016-01-01 12:27 GMT+02:00 Dieter :
> >
> > a04 D< D< | /
> > a04 D> | /
> ...
> > Is this the recommended modeling or are there alternatives?
>
> Look at the TeX file generated by PMX. You will see
>
> \hpstrt10\hpcend100
>
> Experiment with the parameters. When you
Hi Don,
thanks again for your rapid help. I am happy that I am able to solve the
problem within PMX.
In particular with respect to automatizing the conversion from MusicXML
to PMX.
Yes, I am still working on this!
Happy New Year to you, as well.
Dieter
Am 01.01.2016 um 17:40 schrieb Don
Don Simons wrote:
Christian wrote:
I've tried various old pmx versions on this source. The oldest that
works is pmx 2.506
I'm impressed that you kept them all around.
I don't. You may pick out any old pmx version from
http://icking-music-archive.org/software/pmx/
The arpeggio bug has
5 matches
Mail list logo