Hi, dear friends:
after using xml2pmx and obtaining the PMX file, I launch musixtex on
it but get a messed PDF output. My system is a Debian Linux latest
version. Anybody there using the same? I'm attaching both PMX and
PDF outputs. Please help who can. It may be some bug in some
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 5:04 PM Rodolfo Medina wrote:
>
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 4:39 PM Bob Tennent wrote:
> >
> > That seems to date from 2015. Try installing from https://ctan.org/pkg/pmx
> > or http://icking-music-archive.org/software/pmx/pmx-2.98a.zip.
> >
> > Bob T.
>
> Thanks, I'm
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 5:48 PM Christian Mondrup
wrote:
>
> just a guess: you may be using an older version of musixflx.
Well, but no, because the problem occurs between DVI and PS, whereas
musixflx acts before.
Thanks
Rodolfo
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If
Similar problem:
https://www.mail-archive.com/tex-music@tug.org/msg05513.html
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 6:15 PM Bob Tennent wrote:
>
> Looking at the log produced by musixtex -i, I see that musixdia.tex and
> musixper.tex are input; I don't know why. Is it possible you don't have
> these extension packages?
> Perhaps you should run musixtex -i and attach the log
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 4:39 PM Bob Tennent wrote:
>
> That seems to date from 2015. Try installing from https://ctan.org/pkg/pmx
> or http://icking-music-archive.org/software/pmx/pmx-2.98a.zip.
>
> Bob T.
Thanks, I'm installing it, but I'm afraid the problem is not in the
pmxab step but in the
Is the trouble already in the PostScript format?
Bye
--
Jean-Pierre Coulon
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 5:35 PM Jean-Pierre Coulon wrote:
>
> On Sat, 19 Nov 2022, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
>
> > Yes it is:
>
> Here I obtain this with the Tex distribution with Windows 10.
>
> Please try to convert my ps.
You mean convert to PDF format? I did, via ps2pdf, and it worked fine.
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 5:40 PM Rodolfo Medina wrote:
>
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 5:35 PM Jean-Pierre Coulon wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 19 Nov 2022, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> >
> > > Yes it is:
> >
> > Here I obtain this with the Tex distribution with Windows 10.
> >
> > Please try to convert my ps.
>
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 5:46 PM Jean-Pierre Coulon wrote:
>
> Then try my dvi.
Yes, but error:
$ dvips -z bach_prelfug544_retypeset.dvi
This is dvips(k) 2022.1 (TeX Live 2022) Copyright 2022 Radical Eye
Software (www.radicaleye.com)
' TeX output 2022.11.08:2105' -> bach_prelfug544_retypeset.ps
Sorry !
On Sat, 19 Nov 2022, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 5:46 PM Jean-Pierre Coulon wrote:
Then try my dvi.
Yes, but error:
$ dvips -z bach_prelfug544_retypeset.dvi
This is dvips(k) 2022.1 (TeX Live 2022) Copyright 2022 Radical Eye
Software (www.radicaleye.com)
' TeX
Works OK here. What version of PMX are you running?
Bob T.
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 11:12 AM Rodolfo Medina
wrote:
> Hi, dear friends:
>
> after using xml2pmx and obtaining the PMX file, I launch musixtex on
> it but get a messed PDF output. My system is a Debian Linux latest
> version.
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 4:26 PM Bob Tennent wrote:
>
> Works OK here. What version of PMX are you running?
>
> Bob T.
I think it's the one coming from and with Debian:
# aptitude install pmx
pmx is already installed at the requested version (2.7.0.ctan20150301-4)
pmx is already installed at
That seems to date from 2015. Try installing from https://ctan.org/pkg/pmx
or http://icking-music-archive.org/software/pmx/pmx-2.98a.zip.
Bob T.
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 11:34 AM Rodolfo Medina
wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 4:26 PM Bob Tennent wrote:
> >
> > Works OK here. What version of
Den 19.11.2022 kl. 18.27 skrev Rodolfo Medina:
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 5:04 PM Rodolfo Medina wrote:
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 4:39 PM Bob Tennent wrote:
That seems to date from 2015. Try installing from https://ctan.org/pkg/pmx
or http://icking-music-archive.org/software/pmx/pmx-2.98a.zip.
Looking at the log produced by musixtex -i, I see that musixdia.tex and
musixper.tex are input; I don't know why. Is it possible you don't have
these extension packages?
Perhaps you should run musixtex -i and attach the log file.
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 1:09 PM Rodolfo Medina
wrote:
> On
What is the output generated by dvips bach-bwv847prel_fug#2.dvi ?
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 1:22 PM Rodolfo Medina
wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 6:15 PM Bob Tennent wrote:
> >
> > Looking at the log produced by musixtex -i, I see that musixdia.tex and
> musixper.tex are input; I don't know
Rodolfo--
Sorry about the problem. I glanced at the long stream of responses but didn't
look in detail.
I have no problem at all processing your pmx file using my standard batch file
under a windows 2000 command prompt window, which produces the postscript. The
code versions run are
PMX,
On Sat, 19 Nov 2022, Bob Tennent wrote:
What is the output generated by dvips bach-bwv847prel_fug#2.dvi ?
Hope I understand the question. dvips won't let you catch the result into
a file, typing ">result.txt"
--
Jean-Pierre Coulon---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 6:40 PM Bob Tennent wrote:
>
> Perhaps you should attach your dvi file for us.
Here it is:
bach-bwv847prel_fug#2.dvi
Description: TeX dvi file
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 7:05 PM Christian Mondrup
wrote:
>
> Den 19.11.2022 kl. 19.43 skrev Bob Tennent:
> > Produces good output here. Maybe your dvips binary is corrupt?
>
> I can reproduce the error on my linux Mint 20 station. I have tex
> installed from tug TexLive rather than from Mint
Den 19.11.2022 kl. 20.41 skrev Rodolfo Medina:
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 7:05 PM Christian Mondrup
wrote:
Den 19.11.2022 kl. 19.43 skrev Bob Tennent:
Produces good output here. Maybe your dvips binary is corrupt?
I can reproduce the error on my linux Mint 20 station. I have tex
installed
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 6:29 PM Bob Tennent wrote:
>
> What is the output generated by dvips bach-bwv847prel_fug#2.dvi ?
It looks ok also:
$ dvips bach-bwv847prel_fug#2.dvi
This is dvips(k) 2022.1 (TeX Live 2022) Copyright 2022 Radical Eye
Software (www.radicaleye.com)
' TeX output
Perhaps you should attach your dvi file for us.
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 1:32 PM Rodolfo Medina
wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 6:29 PM Bob Tennent wrote:
> >
> > What is the output generated by dvips bach-bwv847prel_fug#2.dvi ?
>
> It looks ok also:
>
> $ dvips bach-bwv847prel_fug#2.dvi
>
Produces good output here. Maybe your dvips binary is corrupt?
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 1:41 PM Rodolfo Medina
wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 6:40 PM Bob Tennent wrote:
> >
> > Perhaps you should attach your dvi file for us.
>
> Here it is:
>
---
TeX-music@tug.org
Den 19.11.2022 kl. 19.43 skrev Bob Tennent:
Produces good output here. Maybe your dvips binary is corrupt?
I can reproduce the error on my linux Mint 20 station. I have tex
installed from tug TexLive rather than from Mint package repository
dvips bach-bwv847prel_fug#2.dvi
This is dvips(k)
Here's the output when I run dvips. The only difference I see is in the first
line of output, which I presume relates to the source of the dvips executable.
C:\Users\dsimo\Documents\PMX>dvips bwv847_1
This is dvips(k) 2022.1 (MiKTeX22.8) Copyright 2021 Radical Eye Software
(www.radicaleye.com)
27 matches
Mail list logo
