Re: [Tex-music] Problems with PDF output

2022-11-21 Thread Rodolfo Medina
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 6:53 PM Christian Mondrup
 wrote:
>
> > Works perfectly with Rodolofo's pmx file on my Mint 20 pc.
>
> But I do get an erroneous postscript file if I process the pmx file the
> traditional way:
>
> pmab  etex  musixflx  etex  dvips 
>
> The dvi file appears corrupted when viewed with evince but is OK when
> viewed with xdvi
>
> The postscript result also appears erroneous when viewed with the Ocular
> document viewer. See the attached sceenshot

I solved it by removing and reinstalling all texlive packages in my
Debian Sid system.  Now the traditional way also seems to work.

Rodolfo
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music


Re: [Tex-music] Problems with PDF output

2022-11-21 Thread Christian Mondrup

Den 21.11.2022 kl. 18.27 skrev Christian Mondrup:

Den 19.11.2022 kl. 20.49 skrev Christian Mondrup:

Den 19.11.2022 kl. 20.41 skrev Rodolfo Medina:

On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 7:05 PM Christian Mondrup
 wrote:


Den 19.11.2022 kl. 19.43 skrev Bob Tennent:

Produces good output here.  Maybe your dvips binary is corrupt?


I can reproduce the error on my linux Mint 20 station. I have tex
installed from tug TexLive rather than from Mint package repository


What do you people suggest?



Did you try 'musixtex -p bach-bwv847prel_fug#2.pmx' ?

ie. direct tex-pdf (pdftex etc)


Works perfectly with Rodolofo's pmx file on my Mint 20 pc.


But I do get an erroneous postscript file if I process the pmx file the 
traditional way:


pmab  etex  musixflx  etex  dvips 

The dvi file appears corrupted when viewed with evince but is OK when 
viewed with xdvi


The postscript result also appears erroneous when viewed with the Ocular 
document viewer. See the attached sceenshot




I have texlive-22 installed from TUG, not from Mint deb package repository.

Greetings


--
Christian Mondrup
WIMA: Werner Icking Music Archive
http://imslp.org/wiki/Category:WIMA_files
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music


Re: [Tex-music] Problems with PDF output

2022-11-21 Thread Rodolfo Medina
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 6:23 PM Agustin Martin  wrote:
>
> Hi, Rodolfo,
>
> Is good old xdvi rendering your dvi file correctly? Here it seems to
> do so. It should complain if some fonts are missing.
>
> gv is not working here too, but those are known bugs
> (https://bugs.debian.org/gv) Note also that last gv release is from
> 2013. Try evince (should also display ps files, at least here it does)

Thanks all!  The problem seems to be solved once I removed and then
installed again all packages related to texlive, texlive-music
included.

Thank you dear friends for your kind help.

Rodolfo

P.S.: Augustin, yes, dear old good xdvi did render the dvi file
despite the font problem.  ;-) Is the bug about gv hopefully be soon
fixed?
Greetings
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music


Re: [Tex-music] Problems with PDF output

2022-11-21 Thread Agustin Martin
El lun, 21 nov 2022 a las 18:13, Rodolfo Medina
() escribió:
>
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 4:57 PM Agustin Martin  
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi, Rodolfo,
> >
> > Is package texlive-music installed? Before installing it some fonts
> > were found missing,
> >
> > mktexpk: don't know how to create bitmap font for xslz20
> > mktexpk: don't know how to create bitmap font for mxsk
> > mktexpk: don't know how to create bitmap font for musixspx
> > mktexpk: don't know how to create bitmap font for musix20
> > mktexpk: don't know how to create bitmap font for musix13
> >
> > and even dvi file looked wrong.
> >
> > But after installing it result looks good here (Debian unstable).
>
> Thanks, well, texlive-music is installed, and dvips output looks all
> right so it does not seem to lack any font.  I'm running Unstable too.

Hi, Rodolfo,

Is good old xdvi rendering your dvi file correctly? Here it seems to
do so. It should complain if some fonts are missing.

> The problem occurred just after upgrading and since then my printer
> won't work either and neither the application "gv" to read PS files...

gv is not working here too, but those are known bugs
(https://bugs.debian.org/gv) Note also that last gv release is from
2013. Try evince (should also display ps files, at least here it does)

---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music


Re: [Tex-music] Problems with PDF output

2022-11-21 Thread Bob Tennent
So you're using a distribution dvips, rather than texlive's dvips.  Please
verify that you have the musixtex fonts, likely part of the texlive-music
package.

On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 12:22 PM Rodolfo Medina 
wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 5:11 PM Bob Tennent  wrote:
> >
> > Rodolfo:  As has already been determined, the problem is the dvips
> step.  Please do
> >
> > $ which dvips
> >
> > and if the output is
> >
> > /usr/local/bin/dvips
> >
> > do
> >
> > $ ls -l/usr/local/bin/dvips
> >
> > which should point to .../texlive2022/bin/x86_64-linux/dvips
> >
> > I suspect you're using a corrupt dvips.
> >
> > Bob
>
> $ which dvips
> /usr/bin/dvips
>
> dvips works fine on PS non-musical files.
>
> Rodolfo
>
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music


Re: [Tex-music] Problems with PDF output

2022-11-21 Thread Christian Mondrup

Den 19.11.2022 kl. 20.49 skrev Christian Mondrup:

Den 19.11.2022 kl. 20.41 skrev Rodolfo Medina:

On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 7:05 PM Christian Mondrup
 wrote:


Den 19.11.2022 kl. 19.43 skrev Bob Tennent:

Produces good output here.  Maybe your dvips binary is corrupt?


I can reproduce the error on my linux Mint 20 station. I have tex
installed from tug TexLive rather than from Mint package repository


What do you people suggest?



Did you try 'musixtex -p bach-bwv847prel_fug#2.pmx' ?

ie. direct tex-pdf (pdftex etc)


Works perfectly with Rodolofo's pmx file on my Mint 20 pc.

I have texlive-22 installed from TUG, not from Mint deb package repository.

Greetings
--
Christian Mondrup
WIMA: Werner Icking Music Archive
http://imslp.org/wiki/Category:WIMA_files


---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music


Re: [Tex-music] Problems with PDF output

2022-11-21 Thread Rodolfo Medina
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 5:18 PM Bob Tennent  wrote:
>
> Do you have ghostscript installed?

Yes, I do.

Rodolfo
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music


Re: [Tex-music] Problems with PDF output

2022-11-21 Thread Rodolfo Medina
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 5:11 PM Bob Tennent  wrote:
>
> Rodolfo:  As has already been determined, the problem is the dvips step.  
> Please do
>
> $ which dvips
>
> and if the output is
>
> /usr/local/bin/dvips
>
> do
>
> $ ls -l/usr/local/bin/dvips
>
> which should point to .../texlive2022/bin/x86_64-linux/dvips
>
> I suspect you're using a corrupt dvips.
>
> Bob

$ which dvips
/usr/bin/dvips

dvips works fine on PS non-musical files.

Rodolfo
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music


Re: [Tex-music] Problems with PDF output

2022-11-21 Thread Bob Tennent
Do you have ghostscript installed?

On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 12:13 PM Rodolfo Medina 
wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 4:57 PM Agustin Martin 
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi, Rodolfo,
> >
> > Is package texlive-music installed? Before installing it some fonts
> > were found missing,
> >
> > mktexpk: don't know how to create bitmap font for xslz20
> > mktexpk: don't know how to create bitmap font for mxsk
> > mktexpk: don't know how to create bitmap font for musixspx
> > mktexpk: don't know how to create bitmap font for musix20
> > mktexpk: don't know how to create bitmap font for musix13
> >
> > and even dvi file looked wrong.
> >
> > But after installing it result looks good here (Debian unstable).
>
> Thanks, well, texlive-music is installed, and dvips output looks all
> right so it does not seem to lack any font.  I'm running Unstable too.
> The problem occurred just after upgrading and since then my printer
> won't work either and neither the application "gv" to read PS files...
>
> Rodolfo
>
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music


Re: [Tex-music] Problems with PDF output

2022-11-21 Thread Rodolfo Medina
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 4:57 PM Agustin Martin  wrote:
>
> Hi, Rodolfo,
>
> Is package texlive-music installed? Before installing it some fonts
> were found missing,
>
> mktexpk: don't know how to create bitmap font for xslz20
> mktexpk: don't know how to create bitmap font for mxsk
> mktexpk: don't know how to create bitmap font for musixspx
> mktexpk: don't know how to create bitmap font for musix20
> mktexpk: don't know how to create bitmap font for musix13
>
> and even dvi file looked wrong.
>
> But after installing it result looks good here (Debian unstable).

Thanks, well, texlive-music is installed, and dvips output looks all
right so it does not seem to lack any font.  I'm running Unstable too.
The problem occurred just after upgrading and since then my printer
won't work either and neither the application "gv" to read PS files...

Rodolfo
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music


Re: [Tex-music] Problems with PDF output

2022-11-21 Thread Bob Tennent
Rodolfo:  As has already been determined, the problem is the dvips step.
Please do

$ which dvips

and if the output is

/usr/local/bin/dvips

do

$ ls -l/usr/local/bin/dvips

which should point to .../texlive2022/bin/x86_64-linux/dvips

I suspect you're using a corrupt dvips.

Bob

On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 11:53 AM Rodolfo Medina 
wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 4:37 PM Bob Tennent  wrote:
> >
> > Rodolfo:  Please run musixtex -i pmx   and attach all the
> intermediate and log files. I run Linux Mint and don't see a problem.
>  AFAIK, only Christian
> > has duplicated the problem, also on Mint I believe.   We've got to get
> to the bottom of this.
> >
> > Bob
>
> Thanks...  Here they are:
>
> Rodolfo
>
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music


Re: [Tex-music] Problems with PDF output

2022-11-21 Thread Agustin Martin
El sáb, 19 nov 2022 a las 19:41, Rodolfo Medina
() escribió:
>
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 6:40 PM Bob Tennent  wrote:
> >
> > Perhaps you should attach your dvi file for us.
>
> Here it is:
> ---
> TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
> If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
> https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

Hi, Rodolfo,

Is package texlive-music installed? Before installing it some fonts
were found missing,

mktexpk: don't know how to create bitmap font for xslz20
mktexpk: don't know how to create bitmap font for mxsk
mktexpk: don't know how to create bitmap font for musixspx
mktexpk: don't know how to create bitmap font for musix20
mktexpk: don't know how to create bitmap font for musix13

and even dvi file looked wrong.

But after installing it result looks good here (Debian unstable).

---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music


Re: [Tex-music] Problems with PDF output

2022-11-21 Thread Bob Tennent
Rodolfo:  Please run musixtex -i pmx   and attach all the intermediate
and log files. I run Linux Mint and don't see a problem.   AFAIK, only
Christian has duplicated the problem, also on Mint I believe.   We've got
to get to the bottom of this.

Bob

On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 11:31 AM Rodolfo Medina 
wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 4:18 PM  wrote:
> >
> > Rodolfo wrote
> >
> > > What do you people suggest?
> >
> >
> > Switch to Windows 10 
> >
> >
> >
> > Seriously, did you solve the problem?
> >
> > --Don Simons
>
>
> Unfortunately not...
>
> Rodolfo
>
> ---
> TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
> If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
> https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
>
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music


Re: [Tex-music] Problems with PDF output

2022-11-21 Thread Rodolfo Medina
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 4:18 PM  wrote:
>
> Rodolfo wrote
>
> > What do you people suggest?
>
>
> Switch to Windows 10 
>
>
>
> Seriously, did you solve the problem?
>
> --Don Simons


Unfortunately not...

Rodolfo

---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music


Re: [Tex-music] Problems with PDF output

2022-11-21 Thread dsimons
Rodolfo wrote

> 

> What do you people suggest?

> 

 

Switch to Windows 10 

 

Seriously, did you solve the problem?

 

--Don Simons

---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music


Re: [Tex-music] Problems with PDF output

2022-11-19 Thread dsimons
Here's the output when I run dvips. The only difference I see is in the first 
line of output, which I presume relates to the source of the dvips executable.

C:\Users\dsimo\Documents\PMX>dvips bwv847_1
This is dvips(k) 2022.1 (MiKTeX22.8)  Copyright 2021 Radical Eye Software 
(www.radicaleye.com)
' TeX output 2022.11.19:1817' -> bwv847_1.ps



.





[1]

It produces a perfectly fine postscript file.

--Don Simons

> -Original Message-
> From: TeX-Music 
> On Behalf Of Christian Mondrup
> Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2022 11:04 AM
> To: tex-music@tug.org
> Subject: Re: [Tex-music] Problems with PDF output
> 
> Den 19.11.2022 kl. 19.43 skrev Bob Tennent:
> > Produces good output here.  Maybe your dvips binary is corrupt?
> 
> I can reproduce the error on my linux Mint 20 station. I have tex installed
> from tug TexLive rather than from Mint package repository
> 
> dvips bach-bwv847prel_fug#2.dvi
> 
> This is dvips(k) 2022.1 (TeX Live 2022)  Copyright 2022 Radical Eye Software
> (www.radicaleye.com) ' TeX output 2022.11.19:1817' -> bach-
> bwv847prel_fug#2.ps 
> 
> 
> .
>  dist/fonts/type1/public/amsfonts/cm/cmbx8.pfb>
>  dist/fonts/type1/public/amsfonts/cm/cmbx12.pfb>
> 
>  dist/fonts/type1/public/amsfonts/cm/cmr10.pfb>
> [1]
> 
> --
> Christian Mondrup
> WIMA: Werner Icking Music Archive
> http://imslp.org/wiki/Category:WIMA_files
> 
> 
> ---
> TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
> If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
> https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music


---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music


Re: [Tex-music] Problems with PDF output

2022-11-19 Thread Christian Mondrup

Den 19.11.2022 kl. 20.41 skrev Rodolfo Medina:

On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 7:05 PM Christian Mondrup
 wrote:


Den 19.11.2022 kl. 19.43 skrev Bob Tennent:

Produces good output here.  Maybe your dvips binary is corrupt?


I can reproduce the error on my linux Mint 20 station. I have tex
installed from tug TexLive rather than from Mint package repository


What do you people suggest?



Did you try 'musixtex -p bach-bwv847prel_fug#2.pmx' ?

ie. direct tex-pdf (pdftex etc)
--
Christian Mondrup
WIMA: Werner Icking Music Archive
http://imslp.org/wiki/Category:WIMA_files


---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music


Re: [Tex-music] Problems with PDF output

2022-11-19 Thread Rodolfo Medina
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 7:05 PM Christian Mondrup
 wrote:
>
> Den 19.11.2022 kl. 19.43 skrev Bob Tennent:
> > Produces good output here.  Maybe your dvips binary is corrupt?
>
> I can reproduce the error on my linux Mint 20 station. I have tex
> installed from tug TexLive rather than from Mint package repository

What do you people suggest?

Rodolfo
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music


Re: [Tex-music] Problems with PDF output

2022-11-19 Thread Christian Mondrup

Den 19.11.2022 kl. 19.43 skrev Bob Tennent:

Produces good output here.  Maybe your dvips binary is corrupt?


I can reproduce the error on my linux Mint 20 station. I have tex 
installed from tug TexLive rather than from Mint package repository


dvips bach-bwv847prel_fug#2.dvi

This is dvips(k) 2022.1 (TeX Live 2022)  Copyright 2022 Radical Eye 
Software (www.radicaleye.com)

' TeX output 2022.11.19:1817' -> bach-bwv847prel_fug#2.ps



.




[1]

--
Christian Mondrup
WIMA: Werner Icking Music Archive
http://imslp.org/wiki/Category:WIMA_files


---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music


Re: [Tex-music] Problems with PDF output

2022-11-19 Thread Bob Tennent
Produces good output here.  Maybe your dvips binary is corrupt?

On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 1:41 PM Rodolfo Medina 
wrote:

> On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 6:40 PM Bob Tennent  wrote:
> >
> > Perhaps you should attach your dvi file for us.
>
> Here it is:
>
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music


Re: [Tex-music] Problems with PDF output

2022-11-19 Thread Rodolfo Medina
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 6:40 PM Bob Tennent  wrote:
>
> Perhaps you should attach your dvi file for us.

Here it is:


bach-bwv847prel_fug#2.dvi
Description: TeX dvi file
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music


Re: [Tex-music] Problems with PDF output

2022-11-19 Thread Bob Tennent
Perhaps you should attach your dvi file for us.

On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 1:32 PM Rodolfo Medina 
wrote:

> On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 6:29 PM Bob Tennent  wrote:
> >
> > What is the output generated by dvips bach-bwv847prel_fug#2.dvi ?
>
> It looks ok also:
>
> $ dvips bach-bwv847prel_fug#2.dvi
> This is dvips(k) 2022.1 (TeX Live 2022)  Copyright 2022 Radical Eye
> Software (www.radicaleye.com)
> ' TeX output 2022.11.19:1817' -> bach-bwv847prel_fug#2.ps
> 
> 
> 
> .
> 
> 
>
> 
> 
>
> 
> [1]
>
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music


Re: [Tex-music] Problems with PDF output

2022-11-19 Thread Jean-Pierre Coulon

On Sat, 19 Nov 2022, Bob Tennent wrote:


What is the output generated by dvips bach-bwv847prel_fug#2.dvi ?


Hope I understand the question. dvips won't let you catch the result into 
a file, typing ">result.txt"


--
Jean-Pierre Coulon---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music


Re: [Tex-music] Problems with PDF output

2022-11-19 Thread dsimons
Rodolfo--

Sorry about the problem. I glanced at the long stream of responses but didn't 
look in detail. 

I have no problem at all processing your pmx file using my standard batch file 
under a windows 2000 command prompt window, which produces the postscript. The 
code versions run are

PMX, Version 2.98 , 12 Dec 21
pdfTeX, Version 3.141592653-2.6-1.40.24 (MiKTeX 22.8)
MusiXTeX(c) 1.32 <2021-05-13>
Musixflx-0.83.3.lua7
dvips(k) 2022.1 (MiKTeX22.8)

I view the file in GSview version 5.0 2012-01-17, from which I produce a pdf 
using the "convert" command.

This probably won't help much since I think I'm the only one in the world who 
runs PMX/MusiXTeX under Windows, but perhaps the version numbers are of use.

--Don Simons

> -Original Message-
> From: TeX-Music 
> On Behalf Of Rodolfo Medina
> Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2022 8:12 AM
> To: Werner Icking Music Archive 
> Subject: [Tex-music] Problems with PDF output
> 
> Hi, dear friends:
> 
> after using xml2pmx and obtaining the PMX file, I launch musixtex on it but
> get a messed PDF output.  My system is a Debian Linux latest version.
> Anybody there using the same?  I'm attaching both PMX and PDF outputs.
> Please help who can.  It may be some bug in some application, possibly dvips,
> but I don't know how to work it out.
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> 
> Rodolfo


---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music


Re: [Tex-music] Problems with PDF output

2022-11-19 Thread Rodolfo Medina
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 6:29 PM Bob Tennent  wrote:
>
> What is the output generated by dvips bach-bwv847prel_fug#2.dvi ?

It looks ok also:

$ dvips bach-bwv847prel_fug#2.dvi
This is dvips(k) 2022.1 (TeX Live 2022)  Copyright 2022 Radical Eye
Software (www.radicaleye.com)
' TeX output 2022.11.19:1817' -> bach-bwv847prel_fug#2.ps



.





[1]
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music


Re: [Tex-music] Problems with PDF output

2022-11-19 Thread Bob Tennent
What is the output generated by dvips bach-bwv847prel_fug#2.dvi ?

On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 1:22 PM Rodolfo Medina 
wrote:

> On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 6:15 PM Bob Tennent  wrote:
> >
> > Looking at the log produced by musixtex -i, I see that musixdia.tex and
> musixper.tex are input; I don't know why.  Is it possible you don't have
> these extension packages?
> > Perhaps you should run musixtex -i   and attach the log file.
>
> The log file looks ok, and those two tex file are present in my
> system.  I'm attaching the log file.
>
> Thanks
>
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music


Re: [Tex-music] Problems with PDF output

2022-11-19 Thread Rodolfo Medina
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 6:15 PM Bob Tennent  wrote:
>
> Looking at the log produced by musixtex -i, I see that musixdia.tex and 
> musixper.tex are input; I don't know why.  Is it possible you don't have 
> these extension packages?
> Perhaps you should run musixtex -i   and attach the log file.

The log file looks ok, and those two tex file are present in my
system.  I'm attaching the log file.

Thanks
This is pdfTeX, Version 3.141592653-2.6-1.40.24 (TeX Live 2022/Debian) (preloaded format=etex 2022.11.15)  19 NOV 2022 18:17
entering extended mode
 restricted \write18 enabled.
 %&-line parsing enabled.
**bach-bwv847prel_fug#2.tex
(./bach-bwv847prel_fug#2.tex
(/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/generic/musixtex/musixtex.tex
MusiXTeX(c) 1.34 <2021-07-24>
\n@i=\count27
\n@ii=\count28
\n@iii=\count29
\n@iv=\count30
\n@v=\count31
\n@vi=\count32
\n@vii=\count33
\n@viii=\count34
\count@=\count35
\toks@box=\box16
\w@rkbox=\box17
\n@otebox=\box18
\y@=\dimen16
\y@i=\dimen17
\y@ii=\dimen18
\y@iii=\dimen19
\y@iv=\dimen20
\y@v=\dimen21
\group@no=\count36
\interinstrument=\dimen22
\N@s=\count37
\s@Y=\dimen23
\lin@pos=\dimen24
\meet@minus@n@iv=\count38
\interbeam=\dimen25
\b@amthick=\dimen26
\Interligne=\dimen27
\Internote=\dimen28
\ch@box=\box19
\musicsize=\count39
\qd@skip=\dimen29
\qn@width=\dimen30
\wn@width=\dimen31
\txt@ff=\skip18
\s@indent=\skip19
\big@spc=\skip20
\lthick=\dimen32
\afterruleskip=\skip21
\staffbotmarg=\dimen33
\stafftopmarg=\dimen34
\line@width=\dimen35
\interportee=\dimen36
\noport@@=\count40
\noinstrum@nt=\count41
\altportee=\dimen37
\systemheight=\dimen38
\altplancher=\dimen39
\instrum@in@group=\skip22
\boxitsep=\skip23
\barsinpi@c@=\count42
\barno=\count43
\startbarno=\count44
\sign@skip=\dimen40
\maxsign@skip=\dimen41
\x@skip=\dimen42
\n@skip=\dimen43
\beforeruleskip=\skip24
\widthtyp@=\count45
\lastbarno=\count46
\cut@v=\skip25
\init@volta@pos=\skip26
\volta@startcor=\skip27
\volta@endcor=\skip28
\writ@volta@box=\box20
\barsinlin@=\count47
\maxbarsinlin@=\count48
\lastbarpos=\skip29
\ut@ref=\count49
\meterskip=\skip30
\t@c=\toks13
\clef@skip=\skip31
\noteskip=\dimen44
\transpose=\count50
\normaltranspose=\count51
\locx@skip=\dimen45
\elemskip=\dimen46
\@l@mskip=\dimen47
\inh@alt=\count52
\st@bot=\dimen48
\st@top=\dimen49
\stem@skip=\dimen50
\s@lope=\dimen51
\y@vi=\dimen52
\lift@rest=\dimen53
\accshift=\skip32
\@icresc=\skip33
\pdl@pos=\dimen54
\bigwedgebox=\box21
\@itrillei=\skip34
\@itrilleii=\skip35
\@itrilleiii=\skip36
\@itrilleiv=\skip37
\@itrillev=\skip38
\@itrillevi=\skip39
\tr@number=\count53
\tr@nspose=\count54
\o@swz=\toks14
\o@number=\count55
\y@vii=\dimen55
\y@viii=\dimen56
\y@ix=\dimen57
\tuptxtb@x=\box22
\notes@open=\count56
\k@ii=\skip40
\i@ni=\dimen58
\b@xi=\dimen59
\b@zi=\dimen60
\c@xi=\dimen61
\c@zi=\skip41
\d@xi=\dimen62
\d@zi=\skip42
\e@xi=\dimen63
\e@zi=\skip43
\b@pi=\count57
\b@ni=\count58
\n@pi=\count59
\a@si=\count60
\o@si=\count61
\a@ci=\toks15
\o@ci=\toks16
\m@ti=\toks17
\k@iii=\skip44
\i@nii=\dimen64
\b@xii=\dimen65
\b@zii=\dimen66
\c@xii=\dimen67
\c@zii=\skip45
\d@xii=\dimen68
\d@zii=\skip46
\e@xii=\dimen69
\e@zii=\skip47
\b@pii=\count62
\b@nii=\count63
\n@pii=\count64
\a@sii=\count65
\o@sii=\count66
\a@cii=\toks18
\o@cii=\toks19
\m@tii=\toks20
\k@=\skip48
\i@niii=\dimen70
\b@xiii=\dimen71
\b@ziii=\dimen72
\c@xiii=\dimen73
\c@ziii=\skip49
\d@xiii=\dimen74
\d@ziii=\skip50
\e@xiii=\dimen75
\e@ziii=\skip51
\b@piii=\count67
\b@niii=\count68
\n@piii=\count69
\a@siii=\count70
\o@siii=\count71
\a@ciii=\toks21
\o@ciii=\toks22
\m@tiii=\toks23
\k@iiv=\skip52
\i@niv=\dimen76
\b@xiv=\dimen77
\b@ziv=\dimen78
\c@xiv=\dimen79
\c@ziv=\skip53
\d@xiv=\dimen80
\d@ziv=\skip54
\e@xiv=\dimen81
\e@ziv=\skip55
\b@piv=\count72
\b@niv=\count73
\n@piv=\count74
\a@siv=\count75
\o@siv=\count76
\a@civ=\toks24
\o@civ=\toks25
\m@tiv=\toks26
\k@iv=\skip56
\i@nv=\dimen82
\b@xv=\dimen83
\b@zv=\dimen84
\c@xv=\dimen85
\c@zv=\skip57
\d@xv=\dimen86
\d@zv=\skip58
\e@xv=\dimen87
\e@zv=\skip59
\b@pv=\count77
\b@nv=\count78
\n@pv=\count79
\a@sv=\count80
\o@sv=\count81
\a@cv=\toks27
\o@cv=\toks28
\m@tv=\toks29
\k@ivi=\skip60
\i@nvi=\dimen88
\b@xvi=\dimen89
\b@zvi=\dimen90
\c@xvi=\dimen91
\c@zvi=\skip61
\d@xvi=\dimen92
\d@zvi=\skip62
\e@xvi=\dimen93
\e@zvi=\skip63
\b@pvi=\count82
\b@nvi=\count83
\n@pvi=\count84
\a@svi=\count85
\o@svi=\count86
\a@cvi=\toks30
\o@cvi=\toks31
\m@tvi=\toks32
maxinstruments=6
\f@xi=\dimen94
\f@zi=\skip64
\f@xii=\dimen95
\f@zii=\skip65
\f@xiii=\dimen96
\f@ziii=\skip66
\f@xiv=\dimen97
\f@ziv=\skip67
\f@xv=\dimen98
\f@zv=\skip68
\f@xvi=\dimen99
\f@zvi=\skip69
 max128beams=6
\g@bi=\skip70
\g@hi=\skip71
\g@bii=\skip72
\g@hii=\skip73
\g@biii=\skip74
\g@hiii=\skip75
 maxgroups=3
\s@xi=\dimen100
\s@si=\toks33
\s@Yi=\dimen101
\s@ai=\skip76
\s@yi=\count87
\s@Ni=\count88
\s@zi=\count89
\s@di=\toks34
\s@xii=\dimen102
\s@sii=\toks35
\s@Yii=\dimen103
\s@aii=\skip77
\s@yii=\count90
\s@Nii=\count91
\s@zii=\count92
\s@dii=\toks36
\s@xiii=\dimen104
\s@siii=\toks37
\s@Yiii=\dimen105

Re: [Tex-music] Problems with PDF output

2022-11-19 Thread Bob Tennent
Looking at the log produced by musixtex -i, I see that musixdia.tex and
musixper.tex are input; I don't know why.  Is it possible you don't have
these extension packages?
Perhaps you should run musixtex -i   and attach the log file.

On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 1:09 PM Rodolfo Medina 
wrote:

> On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 6:05 PM Jean-Pierre Coulon  wrote:
> >
> > Sorry !
>
> Ok, now I could process your DVI but the PS output has the same
> problem of my original PS:
> ---
> TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
> If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
> https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
>
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music


Re: [Tex-music] Problems with PDF output

2022-11-19 Thread Jean-Pierre Coulon

Sorry !

On Sat, 19 Nov 2022, Rodolfo Medina wrote:


On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 5:46 PM Jean-Pierre Coulon  wrote:


Then try my dvi.


Yes, but error:

$ dvips -z bach_prelfug544_retypeset.dvi
This is dvips(k) 2022.1 (TeX Live 2022)  Copyright 2022 Radical Eye
Software (www.radicaleye.com)
' TeX output 2022.11.08:2105' -> bach_prelfug544_retypeset.ps
dvips: ! Couldn't find header file: thikcres.pro
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music



--
Jean-Pierre Coulon

thikcres.pro
Description: Binary data
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music


Re: [Tex-music] Problems with PDF output

2022-11-19 Thread Rodolfo Medina
Similar problem:

https://www.mail-archive.com/tex-music@tug.org/msg05513.html
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music


Re: [Tex-music] Problems with PDF output

2022-11-19 Thread Rodolfo Medina
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 5:48 PM Christian Mondrup
 wrote:
>
> just a guess: you may be using an older version of musixflx.

Well, but no, because the problem occurs between DVI and PS, whereas
musixflx acts before.

Thanks

Rodolfo
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music


Re: [Tex-music] Problems with PDF output

2022-11-19 Thread Rodolfo Medina
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 5:46 PM Jean-Pierre Coulon  wrote:
>
> Then try my dvi.

Yes, but error:

$ dvips -z bach_prelfug544_retypeset.dvi
This is dvips(k) 2022.1 (TeX Live 2022)  Copyright 2022 Radical Eye
Software (www.radicaleye.com)
' TeX output 2022.11.08:2105' -> bach_prelfug544_retypeset.ps
dvips: ! Couldn't find header file: thikcres.pro
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music


Re: [Tex-music] Problems with PDF output

2022-11-19 Thread Christian Mondrup

Den 19.11.2022 kl. 18.27 skrev Rodolfo Medina:

On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 5:04 PM Rodolfo Medina  wrote:


On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 4:39 PM Bob Tennent  wrote:


That seems to date from 2015.  Try installing from https://ctan.org/pkg/pmx
or http://icking-music-archive.org/software/pmx/pmx-2.98a.zip.

Bob T.


Thanks, I'm installing it, but I'm afraid the problem is not in the
pmxab step but in the dvips step


In fact, after installing PMX from Ctan, the problem remains.


just a guess: you may be using an older version of musixflx. The current 
up-to-date version is a lua script, older versions were programmed in c


In a shell window say 'which musixflx' and then check this binary: 'less 
/musixflx


At the top of the binary you should see something like

#!/usr/bin/env texlua

--
Christian Mondrup
WIMA: Werner Icking Music Archive
http://imslp.org/wiki/Category:WIMA_files


---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music


Re: [Tex-music] Problems with PDF output

2022-11-19 Thread Rodolfo Medina
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 5:40 PM Rodolfo Medina  wrote:
>
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 5:35 PM Jean-Pierre Coulon  wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 19 Nov 2022, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> >
> > > Yes it is:
> >
> > Here I obtain this with the Tex distribution with Windows 10.
> >
> > Please try to convert my ps.
>
> You mean convert to PDF format?  I did, via ps2pdf, and it worked fine.

My DVI output is also OK, so the problem is created in the step DVI -> PS.

Rodolfo
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music


Re: [Tex-music] Problems with PDF output

2022-11-19 Thread Rodolfo Medina
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 5:35 PM Jean-Pierre Coulon  wrote:
>
> On Sat, 19 Nov 2022, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
>
> > Yes it is:
>
> Here I obtain this with the Tex distribution with Windows 10.
>
> Please try to convert my ps.

You mean convert to PDF format?  I did, via ps2pdf, and it worked fine.

Rodolfo
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music


Re: [Tex-music] Problems with PDF output

2022-11-19 Thread Rodolfo Medina
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 5:04 PM Rodolfo Medina  wrote:
>
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 4:39 PM Bob Tennent  wrote:
> >
> > That seems to date from 2015.  Try installing from https://ctan.org/pkg/pmx
> > or http://icking-music-archive.org/software/pmx/pmx-2.98a.zip.
> >
> > Bob T.
>
> Thanks, I'm installing it, but I'm afraid the problem is not in the
> pmxab step but in the dvips step

In fact, after installing PMX from Ctan, the problem remains.

Rodolfo
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music


Re: [Tex-music] Problems with PDF output

2022-11-19 Thread Jean-Pierre Coulon

Is the trouble already in the PostScript format?

Bye

--
Jean-Pierre Coulon
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music


Re: [Tex-music] Problems with PDF output

2022-11-19 Thread Rodolfo Medina
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 4:39 PM Bob Tennent  wrote:
>
> That seems to date from 2015.  Try installing from https://ctan.org/pkg/pmx
> or http://icking-music-archive.org/software/pmx/pmx-2.98a.zip.
>
> Bob T.

Thanks, I'm installing it, but I'm afraid the problem is not in the
pmxab step but in the dvips step.  In fact, after installing pmx from
Ctan, i will do:

 $ pmxab file.pmx

and then the usual etex > musixflx > etex > dvips > ps2pdf circle.
I'll let you know, thanks again.

Rodolfo
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music


Re: [Tex-music] Problems with PDF output

2022-11-19 Thread Bob Tennent
That seems to date from 2015.  Try installing from https://ctan.org/pkg/pmx
or http://icking-music-archive.org/software/pmx/pmx-2.98a.zip.

Bob T.

On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 11:34 AM Rodolfo Medina 
wrote:

> On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 4:26 PM Bob Tennent  wrote:
> >
> > Works OK here.  What version of PMX are you running?
> >
> > Bob T.
>
> I think it's the one coming from and with Debian:
>
> # aptitude install pmx
> pmx is already installed at the requested version (2.7.0.ctan20150301-4)
> pmx is already installed at the requested version (2.7.0.ctan20150301-4)
> No packages will be installed, upgraded, or removed.
> 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
> Need to get 0 B of archives. After unpacking 0 B will be used.
>
> And:
>
> # aptitude install musixtex
> musixtex is already installed at the requested version
> (1:1.20.ctan20151216-4)
> musixtex is already installed at the requested version
> (1:1.20.ctan20151216-4)
> No packages will be installed, upgraded, or removed.
> 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
> Need to get 0 B of archives. After unpacking 0 B will be used.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Rodolfo
>
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music


Re: [Tex-music] Problems with PDF output

2022-11-19 Thread Rodolfo Medina
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 4:26 PM Bob Tennent  wrote:
>
> Works OK here.  What version of PMX are you running?
>
> Bob T.

I think it's the one coming from and with Debian:

# aptitude install pmx
pmx is already installed at the requested version (2.7.0.ctan20150301-4)
pmx is already installed at the requested version (2.7.0.ctan20150301-4)
No packages will be installed, upgraded, or removed.
0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 0 B of archives. After unpacking 0 B will be used.

And:

# aptitude install musixtex
musixtex is already installed at the requested version (1:1.20.ctan20151216-4)
musixtex is already installed at the requested version (1:1.20.ctan20151216-4)
No packages will be installed, upgraded, or removed.
0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 0 B of archives. After unpacking 0 B will be used.

Thanks,

Rodolfo
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music


Re: [Tex-music] Problems with PDF output

2022-11-19 Thread Bob Tennent
Works OK here.  What version of PMX are you running?

Bob T.

On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 11:12 AM Rodolfo Medina 
wrote:

> Hi, dear friends:
>
> after using xml2pmx and obtaining the PMX file, I launch musixtex on
> it but get a messed PDF output.  My system is a Debian Linux latest
> version.  Anybody there using the same?  I'm attaching both PMX and
> PDF outputs.  Please help who can.  It may be some bug in some
> application, possibly dvips, but I don't know how to work it out.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Rodolfo
> ---
> TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
> If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
> https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
>


bach-bwv847prel_fug#2.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music