Re: [Tex-music] trills

2021-01-30 Thread dsimons
Andre--

I may possibly have misled you a bit, but it depends on lots of factors. 
Gardner Reed states "...only in the case of an unmeasured tremolo in quarter 
notes is the primary beam broken, so that it does not connect the two stems. 
...there is no other way of setting the quarter note apart from the smaller 
values." But a little later he gives an example in "modern notation" of 
measured quarter note tremolos with an unbroken primary beam but only a single 
broken secondary beam. I will point out that in your original version you had a 
quarter note tremolo with an unbroken primary beam but two secondary beams. 
That would seem to be legal by extension of his second example, but only if you 
wanted the tremolo to be measured. I'll further note that although Read isn't 
100% clear, he seems to say that the difference between measured and unmeasured 
tremolos is whether or not the tempo is slow enough to be able to play the 
notes in the exact rhythm implied by the number of beams. If that's right and 
if your quarter note tremolo is measured, it would have to consist of 8 32nd 
notes. Actually that's not too unreasonable in light of the septuplet that 
follows it. So maybe your original beaming, with the modification I proposed, 
could be OK. On the other hand, if you did want unmeasured, then according to 
Read we'd definitely have to go to broken primary beams on the quarter note 
tremolos, like this:


a22xT12 o^ a+ | [-1 a-4xT03 a+ ] [-1 a-4xT03 a+ ] /
a24xT12 zc ze o^ a | [-1 a4-xT03 zc ze a ]  [l+1 a-x7 zc ze za b c d e f g ] /


This new version raises a couple more typesetting issues. Originally the broken 
triple beams came out too high, almost touching the first note head. Making the 
tremolos into forced, lowered beams solved that. Unfortunately, after lowering 
the beams you might want to lengthen the stems a little, but I couldn't figure 
out any way to get PMX to do that.

I will still try to see if I can solve the original issue you raised. It 
obviously has to do with what number PMX assigns to the indented beams, and it 
looks like as of now it always uses 0.

--Don

> -Original Message-
> From: TeX-Music 
> On Behalf Of a...@telenet.be
> Sent: Friday, January 29, 2021 9:01 PM
> To: 'Werner Icking Music Archive' 
> Subject: Re: [Tex-music] trills
> 
> Thank you very much, Don
> 
> Now i can complete the sheet
> 
> Andre
> 
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: TeX-Music  Namens
> dsim...@roadrunner.com
> Verzonden: zaterdag 30 januari 2021 5:45
> Aan: 'Werner Icking Music Archive' 
> Onderwerp: Re: [Tex-music] trills
> 
> Andre, thanks for finding this bug! I'm impressed. It may take me a while to
> solve it, since I never thought about what problems might come up if you
> have one tremolo stop while another continues. In fact, I probably didn't
> think at all about simultaneous tremolos in different voices. In the meantime,
> you could get the same musical result with this 
> ==
> a22xT12 o^ a+ | a-4xT12 a+ a-4xT12 a+ /
> a24xT12 zc ze o^ a | a4-xT12 zc ze a  [l a-x7 zc ze za b c d e f g ] /
> == --Don
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: TeX-Music  bounces+dsimons=roadrunner@tug.org>
> > On Behalf Of a...@telenet.be
> > Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2021 2:27 AM
> > To: 'Werner Icking Music Archive' 
> > Subject: [Tex-music] trills
> >
> > In this example, the trills are messed up. I cannot get it right with in 
> > line
> TeX.
> >
> > But if i replace his lines in the TeX output from pmx, then it is ok:
> >
> > \pnotes{2.00}\roffset{.7}{\ibbl032}\ibl1{'B}2\hb1A|% replace with
> > \pnotes{2.00}\roffset{.7}{\ibbl332}\ibl1{'B}2\hb1A|%
> >
> > \raise2.16\internote\hbox{\loffset{.7}{\tbl0}}\tbl1\hb1{''A}|% replace
> > with \raise2.16\internote\hbox{\loffset{.7}{\tbl3}}\tbl1\hb1{''A}|%
> >
> > See attached tex file that runs well.
> >
> > I should like not to have to edit the tex file.
> >
> > Thanks for helping
> >
> > Andre
> > 
> > 2 1 2 4 2 4   0 3
> >1 1 16 .1
> >
> > bt
> > ./
> > w400
> > a22xT12 o^ a+ | a-xT12 a+ /
> > a24xT12 zc ze o^ a | a4-xT12 zc ze a  [l a-x7 zc ze za b c d e f g ] /
> > ==
> 
> 
> ---
> TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
> If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
> https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
> 
> 
> Scanned by McAfee and confirmed virus-free.
> Find out more here: https://bit.ly/2zCJMrO
> 
> 
> ---
> TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
> If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
> https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music


---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music


Re: [Tex-music] trills

2021-01-29 Thread avr
Thank you very much, Don

Now i can complete the sheet

Andre

-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: TeX-Music  Namens 
dsim...@roadrunner.com
Verzonden: zaterdag 30 januari 2021 5:45
Aan: 'Werner Icking Music Archive' 
Onderwerp: Re: [Tex-music] trills

Andre, thanks for finding this bug! I'm impressed. It may take me a while to 
solve it, since I never thought about what problems might come up if you have 
one tremolo stop while another continues. In fact, I probably didn't think at 
all about simultaneous tremolos in different voices. In the meantime, you could 
get the same musical result with this 
==
a22xT12 o^ a+ | a-4xT12 a+ a-4xT12 a+ /
a24xT12 zc ze o^ a | a4-xT12 zc ze a  [l a-x7 zc ze za b c d e f g ] / 
== --Don

> -Original Message-
> From: TeX-Music 
> On Behalf Of a...@telenet.be
> Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2021 2:27 AM
> To: 'Werner Icking Music Archive' 
> Subject: [Tex-music] trills
> 
> In this example, the trills are messed up. I cannot get it right with in line 
> TeX.
> 
> But if i replace his lines in the TeX output from pmx, then it is ok:
> 
> \pnotes{2.00}\roffset{.7}{\ibbl032}\ibl1{'B}2\hb1A|% replace with 
> \pnotes{2.00}\roffset{.7}{\ibbl332}\ibl1{'B}2\hb1A|%
> 
> \raise2.16\internote\hbox{\loffset{.7}{\tbl0}}\tbl1\hb1{''A}|% replace 
> with \raise2.16\internote\hbox{\loffset{.7}{\tbl3}}\tbl1\hb1{''A}|%
> 
> See attached tex file that runs well.
> 
> I should like not to have to edit the tex file.
> 
> Thanks for helping
> 
> Andre
> 
> 2 1 2 4 2 4   0 3
>1 1 16 .1
> 
> bt
> ./
> w400
> a22xT12 o^ a+ | a-xT12 a+ /
> a24xT12 zc ze o^ a | a4-xT12 zc ze a  [l a-x7 zc ze za b c d e f g ] / 
> ==


---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music


Scanned by McAfee and confirmed virus-free. 
Find out more here: https://bit.ly/2zCJMrO


---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music


Re: [Tex-music] trills

2021-01-29 Thread dsimons
Andre, thanks for finding this bug! I'm impressed. It may take me a while to 
solve it, since I never thought about what problems might come up if you have 
one tremolo stop while another continues. In fact, I probably didn't think at 
all about simultaneous tremolos in different voices. In the meantime, you could 
get the same musical result with this 
==
a22xT12 o^ a+ | a-4xT12 a+ a-4xT12 a+ /
a24xT12 zc ze o^ a | a4-xT12 zc ze a  [l a-x7 zc ze za b c d e f g ] /
==
--Don

> -Original Message-
> From: TeX-Music 
> On Behalf Of a...@telenet.be
> Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2021 2:27 AM
> To: 'Werner Icking Music Archive' 
> Subject: [Tex-music] trills
> 
> In this example, the trills are messed up. I cannot get it right with in line 
> TeX.
> 
> But if i replace his lines in the TeX output from pmx, then it is ok:
> 
> \pnotes{2.00}\roffset{.7}{\ibbl032}\ibl1{'B}2\hb1A|% replace with
> \pnotes{2.00}\roffset{.7}{\ibbl332}\ibl1{'B}2\hb1A|%
> 
> \raise2.16\internote\hbox{\loffset{.7}{\tbl0}}\tbl1\hb1{''A}|% replace with
> \raise2.16\internote\hbox{\loffset{.7}{\tbl3}}\tbl1\hb1{''A}|%
> 
> See attached tex file that runs well.
> 
> I should like not to have to edit the tex file.
> 
> Thanks for helping
> 
> Andre
> 
> 2 1 2 4 2 4   0 3
>1 1 16 .1
> 
> bt
> ./
> w400
> a22xT12 o^ a+ | a-xT12 a+ /
> a24xT12 zc ze o^ a | a4-xT12 zc ze a  [l a-x7 zc ze za b c d e f g ] /
> ==


---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music


Re: [Tex-music] Trills in pmx

2019-08-13 Thread Don Simons
Andre, thanks for discovering this bug. 

I don't have a solution yet. This will be pretty difficult. The basic reason
is that for normal moved dots, I got them to move by redefining \C@Point ,
which musixtex includes in the dotted note macros \qup etc. But for 2-note
tremolos, I use a different mechanism for inserting any dots, explicitly
using \pt together with an undotted note macro, and that procedure ignores
any redefinition of \C@Point. 

--Don

> -Original Message-
> From: TeX-Music [mailto:tex-music-
> bounces+dsimons=roadrunner@tug.org] On Behalf Of Andre Van
> Ryckeghem
> Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2019 2:19 AM
> To: Werner Icking Music Archive 
> Subject: [Tex-music] Trills in pmx
> 
> Dear Don
> 
> Since the 'the dot on the right note' correction in chords, this trill
compiles
> correct:
> 
> e2dxT12 ?-2.4 zgn zasd ? as-
> 
> and this trill gives a segmentation error:
> 
> e2dxT12 ?-2.4 zgnd+0+1 zasd ? as-
> 
> Thanks to look at it,
> 
> Andre
> 
> ---
> TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
> If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
> https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music

---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music


Re: [Tex-music] Trills

2017-07-14 Thread Don Simons
Well, as a quick fix you could do this:

 

==

32   4 8 4 8 1 -6

1 1  16  .09

 

btt

./

ArbdI.9

Apl+t

r8+0  a42 o_ g  f e //

rb8  a82x3n c ds rb g-x3n ds+ f t fDx3n t e  

f-x3n as b rb e-x3n a b rb /

%rb8  rb2ax4n g4 rb f  rb2ax4n e4 rb e  //

rb8  rb8 g84 rb f  rb8 e rb e  //

r8+0  rb4x6n rb c4 g+ c f- rb4x6n rb b- f+ b e-  

rbx6n rb a- e+ b+ ds- rbx6n rb g- e+ b+ b-   /

b84 g8 o_ .fa r d1s D<+15 ea D<+15+2  

b8+.fa D>+13 g D>+13 ga /

==

 

But there’s no good reason why your original version should fail to blank out 
the rest, especially given that rbx6n… does. I’ll look into it.

 

This bug, and the previous one involving 2-note tremolos in forced beams in 
2-voice staves, are both the kind of subtle, obscure bugs that Werner was so 
adept at finding. Thanks to Andre for carrying on the tradition!

 

--Don

 

 

From: TeX-Music [mailto:tex-music-boun...@tug.org] On Behalf Of Andre Van 
Ryckeghem
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2017 11:45 AM
To: Werner Icking Music Archive <tex-music@tug.org>
Subject: Re: [Tex-music] Trills

 

Hi Don and all

 

This is a somewhat complicated example  with the song staff in mesure 4/8 and 
the accompanion in 6/8 (this is done with tuplets).

 

But as you can see in the middle staff, the hidden rest of the lower voice is 
not hidden at the start of a bar.

Is there a solution for this?

 

Andre

==

32   4 8 4 8 1 -6

1 1  16  .09

 

 

btt

./

ArbdI.9

Apl+t

r8+0  a42 o_ g  f e //

rb8  a82x3n c ds rb g-x3n ds+ f t fDx3n t e  

f-x3n as b rb e-x3n a b rb /

rb8  rb2ax4n g4 rb f  rb2ax4n e4 rb e  //

r8+0  rb4x6n rb c4 g+ c f- rb4x6n rb b- f+ b e-  

rbx6n rb a- e+ b+ ds- rbx6n rb g- e+ b+ b-   /

b84 g8 o_ .fa r d1s D<+15 ea D<+15+2  

b8+.fa D>+13 g D>+13 ga /

==

---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music


Re: [Tex-music] Trills

2017-07-14 Thread Andre Van Ryckeghem
Hi Don and all
This is a somewhat complicated example  with the song staff in mesure 4/8 and 
the accompanion in 6/8 (this is done with tuplets).
But as you can see in the middle staff, the hidden rest of the lower voice is 
not hidden at the start of a bar.
Is there a solution for this?
Andre
==
32   4 8 4 8 1 -6
1 1  16  .09


btt
./
ArbdI.9
Apl+t
r8+0  a42 o_ g  f e //
rb8  a82x3n c ds rb g-x3n ds+ f t fDx3n t e  
f-x3n as b rb e-x3n a b rb /
rb8  rb2ax4n g4 rb f  rb2ax4n e4 rb e  //
r8+0  rb4x6n rb c4 g+ c f- rb4x6n rb b- f+ b e-  
rbx6n rb a- e+ b+ ds- rbx6n rb g- e+ b+ b-   /
b84 g8 o_ .fa r d1s D<+15 ea D<+15+2  
b8+.fa D>+13 g D>+13 ga /
==---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music


Re: [Tex-music] Trills

2017-07-03 Thread Don Simons
There’s no solution yet. I’m afraid it may take some hard work. Computing the 
default vertical positions AND SLOPES of the beams was very complicated even 
when there is only one note at each end. Judging from examples 2 and 4, 

it may not be too hard to simply tweak the height. We’ll see. And tomorrow is a 
holiday in the US.

 

--Don

 

From: TeX-Music [mailto:tex-music-boun...@tug.org] On Behalf Of Andre Van 
Ryckeghem
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2017 9:01 PM
To: Werner Icking Music Archive <tex-music@tug.org>
Subject: Re: [Tex-music] Trills

 

Hi all,

 

I a trying to change the direction of the beams in a 2 note trill.

In the 1st example the beam is not high enough and it should be a low beam.

Using ‘[l’ does not work and higher the beam with ‘[+2’ does not affect the 
short beams (example 2).

If i change the order of the notes i can make the beams low but the problem 
stays (example 3 and 4 ).

 

Is there a solution for this problem?

 

Thanks on advance for helping

Andre

 

==

1 1 6 8 6 8  0 0 1 1 20 0

 

t

./

Ap

AT

 

b24dxT12 zd zg g-  [+2 b24dxT12 zd zg g- ] 

g25dxT12 zd zb g   [-2 g+dxT12 zd zb g ] /

===

---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to 
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music