> William – are you (and others) still working with a PS-based workflow? Why
> not move to something more modern (aka PDF)?
I have a print publishing system that is a few million lines of code with a
composition engine with comments that go back to 1982. It does all of the work
in eps, and
> > I am really unclear on whether there will be fallout from tools removal.
> I have scripts that use tiff2ps. ImageMagick can convert tiffs to ps, but
some versions of ImageMagick shift or scale the image. tiff2ps works.
> I think that with a ps-based workflow, tiff2ps is the best tools to
>> William - are you (and others) still working with a PS-based workflow?
Why not move ot something more modern (aka PDF)?
I may even agree with that somewhat, but tiff2pdf was also deprecated. And
don't point me to ImageMagick and such like, it's not the same thing, some
of the
William – are you (and others) still working with a PS-based workflow? Why not
move ot something more modern (aka PDF)?
As evidenced by Apple removing support from their latest OS platforms – the
technology has not evolve with time and should really be left as a legacy
solution. It is not
Hey all,
I was trying to get a link to a thread for a friend, and in
https://www.awaresystems.be/imaging/tiff/tml/recentthreads.html the last
updated date is two months ago (11 July).
Are there any known issues with it?
Best,
amyspark
--
amyspark https://www.amyspark.me
