Tried it on both Internet Explorer and Firefox. Get lots of coloured circles
but no clock.
Rob K
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of tom
Sent: 29 September 2006 21:20
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re:
On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 07:46:30 +0100, Rob Kimberley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tried it on both Internet Explorer and Firefox. Get lots of coloured circles
but no clock.
Rob K
Look very closly in the lower right corner. I see some time info.
I don't get it much either. Cool though.
Not quite what I was expecting!
Try the attached, which I found and modified for my own use a few years
back. Works OK in Internet Explorer, but not in Firefox - need to check
settings.
Rob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rex
Sent: 30
Tom Van Baak wrote:
Accuracy still won't be much better than1% of the solar diameter or
about 1 second of time nowhere near the o.1 sec or better hoped for.
Bruce
Bruce,
Can you show us how to derive the accuracy number?
I would have guessed that with fractional degree Al-El
OK, there are serious sources of error in making a one-time
solar transit measurement.
What I propose is a differential method, a favorite of
instrument makers to reduce errors. This is possible
because the equation of time makes a correction of only
one percent or so.
A steady platform with a
Bill Hawkins wrote:
OK, there are serious sources of error in making a one-time
solar transit measurement.
What I propose is a differential method, a favorite of
instrument makers to reduce errors. This is possible
because the equation of time makes a correction of only
one percent or so.
12 rows 30 columns...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Rob Kimberley
Sent: Saturday, September 30, 2006 2:50 AM
To: 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement'
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Interesting Graphical Clock
Not quite what
