Dr Bruce Griffiths wrote:
The design is probably a pair of low noise n channel JFETs
configured as a push push doubler.
Inputs driven in antiphase so that each FET conducts ffor
opposite 1/2 cycles with the 2 FET drains connected in parallel.
A bypassed trimpot connected between the FET
Christopher Hoover wrote:
Dr Bruce Griffiths wrote:
The design is probably a pair of low noise n channel JFETs
configured as a push push doubler.
Inputs driven in antiphase so that each FET conducts ffor
opposite 1/2 cycles with the 2 FET drains connected in parallel.
A bypassed
Hi folks,
i would like to announce that new versions of PLOTTER end EZGPIB are
available.
Ulrich, some points for additional features (maybe the latest
version has
these already?):
* Settings such as trace color, Values Format, highlighted
traces etc get
lost when re-loading the
Cool Ulrich!
Professional quality program, for sure.
Thanks,
Said
___
time-nuts mailing list
time-nuts@febo.com
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
I managed to pick up the Austron 1210D-03 portable clock that was
offered up here a little while ago, and the thing is ticking away nicely
on my bench. However, I don't have any docs for it, and in particular
the PPS sync and slew controls on the front aren't entirely
self-explanatory.
Does
John -
I also have the same clock. Mine came from ebay so I am sure I paid a lot
more for it than you did, HI. I did an initial checkout and it seems to work
fine. All of the NiCd batteries in it are dead and I have not done anything
with the clock till I can find some suitable replacements. I
While messing with the 1210D-03 I found that the frequency is a bit low
(about -1Hz) and is beyond the range of the fine adjust on the front panel.
There's a coarse adjust hole on the rear panel, but using various tuning
tools including a long, thin screwdriver I can't seem to engage the
The announcement for the 2006 Frequency Measuring Test
has finally appeared at the ARRL Web site.
For those of you that might be interested go to:
_http://www.arrl.org/w1aw/fmt/_ (http://www.arrl.org/w1aw/fmt/)
73, Don, W4WJ
___
time-nuts
It is back to the previous method of sending a clean CW signal.
I did not participate previously, so I have no experience with the test.
If I understand correctly, they will transmit on all 3 frequencies
simultaneously, but we are supposed to measure only the specific band
they announce at a
They only do their measurement at the time they announce each band, but
all the signals are running simultaneously so you can use them if you dare.
John
Didier Juges said the following on 10/27/2006 09:06 PM:
It is back to the previous method of sending a clean CW signal.
I did not
In a message dated 10/27/2006 9:07:02 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It is back to the previous method of sending a clean CW signal.
I did not participate previously, so I have no experience with the test.
If I understand correctly, they will transmit on all 3
Christopher Hoover wrote:
Dr Bruce Griffiths wrote:
The design is probably a pair of low noise n channel JFETs
configured as a push push doubler.
Inputs driven in antiphase so that each FET conducts ffor
opposite 1/2 cycles with the 2 FET drains connected in parallel.
A bypassed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Didier...
The official readings are taken for the band that is announced.
Even though the exciters at W1AW are left on for an extended period of time
before the test, there is some drift during the
test period.
I would suggest that you listen on 160
13 matches
Mail list logo