[time-nuts] Non-impedance matched antenna cables

2008-06-13 Thread Magnus Danielson
Hi fellow time-nuts, For those of you that isn't aware of it, using 75 Ohm antenna cables rather than 50 Ohm cables is a bad move, as the antenna cable itself will create a multi-path system. This article elaborate on reflections i cables: http://tycho.usno.navy.mil/ptti/1998/Vol 30_39.pdf

Re: [time-nuts] Non-impedance matched antenna cables

2008-06-13 Thread Bruce Griffiths
Magnus Danielson wrote: Hi fellow time-nuts, For those of you that isn't aware of it, using 75 Ohm antenna cables rather than 50 Ohm cables is a bad move, as the antenna cable itself will create a multi-path system. This article elaborate on reflections i cables:

Re: [time-nuts] Non-impedance matched antenna cables

2008-06-13 Thread Javier Herrero
I've seen that you're right, Thunderbolt is originally supplied with 75ft of 75 ohm RG-59 cable, as indicated in the manual... So I've the inverse problem: the GPS antennas we have in the roof both have 50ohm cable :) So... would be good to change the impedance at the Thunderbolt antenna port

Re: [time-nuts] Non-impedance matched antenna cables

2008-06-13 Thread Bruce Griffiths
Javier Herrero wrote: I've seen that you're right, Thunderbolt is originally supplied with 75ft of 75 ohm RG-59 cable, as indicated in the manual... So I've the inverse problem: the GPS antennas we have in the roof both have 50ohm cable :) So... would be good to change the impedance at the

Re: [time-nuts] Non-impedance matched antenna cables

2008-06-13 Thread Björn Gabrielsson
Javier, According to Trimble the Thunderbolt IS 50 ohm at the antenna input. (maybe the sole user of 50ohm F-connectors... ;-) ) See page 3-5, Section 3-4 Antenna Cables (page 39) in http://trl.trimble.com/dscgi/ds.py/Get/File-10001/ThunderBoltBook2003.pdf Note – RG-59 is a 75 ohm coaxial

Re: [time-nuts] Non-impedance matched antenna cables

2008-06-13 Thread Chris Cheney
Before you do this find out what the reflection coefficient is for the Thunderbolt input and the active antenna output when using a 50 ohm cable. The active antenna may not be that well matched to 50 ohm cable. Then adjust the cable length to an odd multiple of half the signal wavelength

Re: [time-nuts] Non-impedance matched antenna cables

2008-06-13 Thread Dave Brown
- Original Message - From: Bruce Griffiths [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 8:37 PM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Non-impedance matched antenna cables Magnus Danielson wrote: Hi fellow time-nuts,

Re: [time-nuts] Non-impedance matched antenna cables

2008-06-13 Thread Javier Herrero
Then, if the input is 50 ohm, at least the reflections in the other extreme of the Thunderbolt + cable (i.e., at the antenna side) should not be so bad... I'm afraid that since the cable is alredy routed using the inside-building tubes (in fact it uses the tubing destinated for the TV antenna)

Re: [time-nuts] Non-impedance matched antenna cables

2008-06-13 Thread Björn Gabrielsson
Javier, On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 12:01 +0200, Javier Herrero wrote: Yes, I was also surprised by the use of F connectors... and that made me suspect (with surprise) that the GPS input were 75ohm, but I must confess that I did not read more ;). Just opened my Thunderbolt to look at the

Re: [time-nuts] Non-impedance matched antenna cables

2008-06-13 Thread John Miles
I don't believe the Thunderbolt is a carrier-phase receiver, is it? If it's not, I'd be surprised if reflections make any difference. They don't seem to have gone out of their way to match either 50 or 75 ohms (see S11 plot of TAPR unit's antenna jack attached), unless the input Z changes

Re: [time-nuts] Non-impedance matched antenna cables

2008-06-13 Thread Chris Cheney
I've seen that you're right, Thunderbolt is originally supplied with 75ft of 75 ohm RG-59 cable, as indicated in the manual... So I've the inverse problem: the GPS antennas we have in the roof both have 50ohm cable :) So... would be good to change the impedance at the Thunderbolt antenna port

Re: [time-nuts] Non-impedance matched antenna cables

2008-06-13 Thread Bruce Griffiths
Chris Cheney wrote: Before you do this find out what the reflection coefficient is for the Thunderbolt input and the active antenna output when using a 50 ohm cable. The active antenna may not be that well matched to 50 ohm cable. Then adjust the cable length to an odd multiple of half the

Re: [time-nuts] Non-impedance matched antenna cables

2008-06-13 Thread Bruce Griffiths
Dave Brown wrote: Has anyone actually measured the TBolt rx input impedance at L1? DaveB, NZ Dave Unable to find specifications for Thunderbolt but some active antenas have an SWR spec of 1.6 or even as much as 2 in a 50 ohm system. Bruce ___

Re: [time-nuts] Non-impedance matched antenna cables

2008-06-13 Thread Bruce Griffiths
Javier Herrero wrote: Then, if the input is 50 ohm, at least the reflections in the other extreme of the Thunderbolt + cable (i.e., at the antenna side) should not be so bad... I'm afraid that since the cable is alredy routed using the inside-building tubes (in fact it uses the tubing

Re: [time-nuts] Non-impedance matched antenna cables

2008-06-13 Thread Bruce Griffiths
Chris Cheney wrote: I've seen that you're right, Thunderbolt is originally supplied with 75ft of 75 ohm RG-59 cable, as indicated in the manual... So I've the inverse problem: the GPS antennas we have in the roof both have 50ohm cable :) So... would be good to change the impedance at the

Re: [time-nuts] thunderbolt for ntpd or gpsd

2008-06-13 Thread Christian Vogel
Hi Tim, On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 10:05:13PM -0400, Tim Cwik wrote: Is there a way to have gpsd use 8N1 for TSIP? The manual says teh thunderbolt uses 8N1, the windows support program says it and the thunderbolt are using 8N1. I can not find a way to tell the thunderbolt to use 8O1. as a

[time-nuts] Non-impedance matched antenna cables

2008-06-13 Thread Mark Sims
Also forget the complication of trying to trim the cable length... the effects of temperature, humidity, pressure, moisture, etc in commercial TV cable being used at microwave frequencies will rather quickly render your precise adjustments moot.

Re: [time-nuts] thunderbolt for ntpd or gpsd

2008-06-13 Thread Chris Kuethe
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 8:58 AM, Christian Vogel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: gpsd: GPS Time 485697.25 1483 14.00 that's encouraging gpsd: Sat info: mode 1, satellites used 5: 18 9 28 15 26 As is this. gpsd: Unhandled TSIP superpacket type 0xab thar's yer problem... kinda. yes, we

Re: [time-nuts] Non-impedance matched antenna cables

2008-06-13 Thread Chris Cheney
Then adjust the cable length to an odd multiple of half the signal wavelength in the cable. snip Nothing to do with impedance transformation. Just the phase shift associated with propagation down the cable and back is then 0. And this is also the case for a cable whose length is an even

Re: [time-nuts] Non-impedance matched antenna cables

2008-06-13 Thread Javier Herrero
I was referring to that :) I've not a TDR available at this moment... However you will need to measure the in place cable length using TDR or other suitable technique. Bruce ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt PS

2008-06-13 Thread Bruce Lanning
Tom, Thank you very much for the information. I am using a larger PS on my Thunderbolt, but I was looking for something smaller. Thanks again for your input. Bruce W1GBS - Original Message - From: Tom Van Baak [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement

[time-nuts] [Fwd: Re: Thunderbolt PS]

2008-06-13 Thread paul
Interesting work posted here about phase noise and how the psu affects this, I have a couple of questions while I'm planning the supply - First, which rail affected the noise component most? Second, what current does the unit draw from each of the rails? My Symetricon splitter takes the gps

[time-nuts] Thunderbolt Group Buy PS

2008-06-13 Thread Didier Juges
Here is how I *glued* the AllElectronics power supply to the top of the Thunderbolt and shortened the cable for a neat, compact package. I connected the chassis wire of the power supply to the TB case. http://www.ko4bb.com/Test_Equipment/Thunderbolt/group_buy/ The power supply is the exact same

Re: [time-nuts] time-nuts Power supply for Trimble Thunderbolt not available

2008-06-13 Thread K6YAZ
All Electronics no longer has the 17 watt power supplies that are good for the Thunderbolt. I checked the web site and went into the store, and they are out. Stuart K6YAZ Los Angeles **Vote for your city's best dining and nightlife. City's Best 2008.

Re: [time-nuts] [Fwd: Re: Thunderbolt PS]

2008-06-13 Thread Dr. Rainer Meergans
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: this, I have a couple of questions while I'm planning the supply - First, which rail affected the noise component most? I would like to add an extra question: How about adding an extra filter after a cheap PC power supply? 73, Rainer

Re: [time-nuts] [Fwd: Re: Thunderbolt PS]

2008-06-13 Thread Björn Gabrielsson
On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 19:31 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Paul, Interesting work posted here about phase noise and how the psu affects this, I have a couple of questions while I'm planning the supply - First, which rail affected the noise component most? Interesting question.

Re: [time-nuts] thunderbolt for ntpd or gpsd

2008-06-13 Thread Chris Kuethe
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Tim Cwik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have changed line 66 to: gpsd_set_speed(session, session-gpsdata.baudrate, 'N', 1); This results in: [goodness snipped] I hope this is progress, but I am not sure why gpsd closes the port and who sends signal 2. it's a

Re: [time-nuts] Non-impedance matched antenna cables

2008-06-13 Thread Bruce Griffiths
Mark Sims wrote: Also forget the complication of trying to trim the cable length... the effects of temperature, humidity, pressure, moisture, etc in commercial TV cable being used at microwave frequencies will rather quickly render your precise adjustments moot.

Re: [time-nuts] [Fwd: Re: Thunderbolt PS]

2008-06-13 Thread Bruce Griffiths
Dr. Rainer Meergans wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: this, I have a couple of questions while I'm planning the supply - First, which rail affected the noise component most? I would like to add an extra question: How about adding an extra filter after a cheap PC power supply?

Re: [time-nuts] [Fwd: Re: Thunderbolt PS]

2008-06-13 Thread Bill Smitherman
To Bruce and Group Concerning Power Supply Flicker Noise on the Thunderbolt GPS system. wouldn't it be prefered to use the old linear supply rather than the compact switcher to minimize this RF and Flicker noise ??? Bill KD4AF On 6/13/08, Bruce Griffiths [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dr. Rainer

Re: [time-nuts] [Fwd: Re: Thunderbolt PS]

2008-06-13 Thread Matthew Smith
Quoth Bill Smitherman at 2008-06-14 09:10... To Bruce and Group Concerning Power Supply Flicker Noise on the Thunderbolt GPS system. wouldn't it be prefered to use the old linear supply rather than the compact switcher to minimize this RF and Flicker noise ??? I was going to ask a similar

Re: [time-nuts] [Fwd: Re: Thunderbolt PS]

2008-06-13 Thread Bruce Griffiths
Matthew Smith wrote: Quoth Bill Smitherman at 2008-06-14 09:10... To Bruce and Group Concerning Power Supply Flicker Noise on the Thunderbolt GPS system. wouldn't it be prefered to use the old linear supply rather than the compact switcher to minimize this RF and Flicker noise ???

Re: [time-nuts] [Fwd: Re: Thunderbolt PS]

2008-06-13 Thread Bruce Griffiths
Bill Smitherman wrote: To Bruce and Group Concerning Power Supply Flicker Noise on the Thunderbolt GPS system. wouldn't it be prefered to use the old linear supply rather than the compact switcher to minimize this RF and Flicker noise ??? Bill KD4AF Yes, except that a dc-dc converter

[time-nuts] Non-impedance matched antenna cables

2008-06-13 Thread Mark Sims
A while back I did a project that used a 100 foot piece of (supposedly) fairly good quality RG58. I checked it with my TDR and then installed it in an outdoor application where it ran for a couple of weeks in good ole' Texas weather. The outdoor connection was covered by a glass jar so water

Re: [time-nuts] Non-impedance matched antenna cables

2008-06-13 Thread Bruce Griffiths
Mark Sims wrote: A while back I did a project that used a 100 foot piece of (supposedly) fairly good quality RG58. I checked it with my TDR and then installed it in an outdoor application where it ran for a couple of weeks in good ole' Texas weather. The outdoor connection was covered by

[time-nuts] Non-impedance matched antenna cables

2008-06-13 Thread Mark Sims
Of course, any Time Nut worth the name would install a servo controlled section of trombone line in his coax to maintain a constant electrical length ;-) This demonstrates that achieving nanosecond propagation delay stability is unlikely when using

Re: [time-nuts] Non-impedance matched antenna cables

2008-06-13 Thread Bruce Griffiths
Mark Sims wrote: Of course, any Time Nut worth the name would install a servo controlled section of trombone line in his coax to maintain a constant electrical length ;-) This demonstrates that achieving nanosecond propagation delay stability is

Re: [time-nuts] thunderbolt for ntpd or gpsd

2008-06-13 Thread Tim Cwik
Chris Kuethe wrote: On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Tim Cwik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have changed line 66 to: gpsd_set_speed(session, session-gpsdata.baudrate, 'N', 1); This results in: [goodness snipped] I hope this is progress, but I am not sure why gpsd closes the

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt Group Buy PS

2008-06-13 Thread Steve
I might try that too . . . except that the Thunderbolt has a MiniCircuits ZFSC-2-1 splitter mounted on top, just above the DB9. The splitter appears to be bolted from inside of the Thunderbolt, so the Thunderbolt will have to be disassembled to remove the splitter. Anyone taken a Thunderbolt

Re: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt Group Buy PS

2008-06-13 Thread Tom Van Baak
I might try that too . . . except that the Thunderbolt has a MiniCircuits ZFSC-2-1 splitter mounted on top, just above the DB9. The splitter appears to be bolted from inside of the Thunderbolt, so the Thunderbolt will have to be disassembled to remove the splitter. Yes, some of the

Re: [time-nuts] Non-impedance matched antenna cables

2008-06-13 Thread Richard W. Solomon
Sounds like an application just calling for hard line. I have some 75 foot lengths of 1/4 Superflex that I'll have to drag out and look at. 73, Dick, W1KSZ -Original Message- From: Mark Sims [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Jun 13, 2008 5:37 PM To: time-nuts@febo.com Subject: [time-nuts]

Re: [time-nuts] Non-impedance matched antenna cables

2008-06-13 Thread Thomas A. Frank
I've another antenna, but is a cheap one with magnetic base, only used for a nixie clock :) I have one of those as well, a Trimble 28367-40 from eBay, it is feeding my Thunderbolt (thank you TVB!), and it works fine just sitting on the window sill - inside! I am curious, however...how

Re: [time-nuts] Finally acquired a 5370B

2008-06-13 Thread swingbyte
Jim Palfreyman wrote: Hi all, Well getting a second hand 5370B will be no big deal for those of you in the US, but in Australia getting one of these units is very expensive due to rare local availability and cost of postage from the US. I was recently quoted US$350 - more than the unit

[time-nuts] Tboltmon position

2008-06-13 Thread Mark Sims
Try SETUP, POSITION, (enter values from survey), SAVE SEGMENT... I think that's what got mine to remember the results of its (3 days to complete) self survey. --- I am curious, however...how does one get TboltMon to SAVE the surveyed position? It had the proper value

[time-nuts] Non-impedance matched antenna cables

2008-06-13 Thread Mark Sims
I suspect that there is an initial rapid aging process (break-in period) that occurs followed by longer term aging effects (much like a crystal oscillator). The particular cable that I used was not new, but had only been used indoors before. I suspect that each temperature cycle a cable goes

Re: [time-nuts] Tboltmon position

2008-06-13 Thread John Miles
You can also just look yourself up on Google Earth and enter the coordinates by hand. -- john, KE5FX -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mark Sims Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 9:00 PM To: time-nuts@febo.com Subject: [time-nuts] Tboltmon

Re: [time-nuts] Tboltmon position

2008-06-13 Thread Thomas A. Frank
Thank you for the information, which I find rather disappointing. For some reason, I had an expectation that a GPS would find its own position and save it, perhaps with a manual click, rather than having the operator write down the values and have to type them into some data entry boxes on

Re: [time-nuts] Tboltmon position

2008-06-13 Thread John Miles
Or you could also click Setup-Self-Survey-Save Position Flag-Save, Set Survey, and Save Segment. I agree that TboltMon's user interface is a bit offbeat in places, but I don't think I'd hold Microsoft responsible for it. :-P -- john, KE5FX -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]