Re: [time-nuts] UTR timescale draft spec

2011-08-06 Thread cook michael
Le 06/08/2011 04:32, WB6BNQ a écrit : Michael Sokolov, I do not mean to be disrespectful, but this list is not about creating time scales No, indeed, but as the subject is time I see no reason that he should not advertise the project here. I am going to ask that you respect this position and

Re: [time-nuts] GPSDO for my rubber duckie

2011-08-06 Thread Hal Murray
msoko...@ivan.harhan.org said: But I _*REFUSE*_ to do it that way. You've mentioned UTC: that's one thing I'm taking great care to avoid in my solution. I want my system to be completely insulated from whatever evil things the ITU may do to UTC and leap seconds. ... I think you have two

Re: [time-nuts] UTR timescale draft spec

2011-08-06 Thread f1ehx
Bonjour, Vous vous foutez peut être du sujet de notre ami, mais ce sujet est respectable, ne serait-ce que par le travail qu'il a impliqué. Mais qui voit votre remontrance ne peut s'empècher de bondir à la sauvagerie de votre réponse en directe sur la liste. Je croyais être entre gens bien, je

Re: [time-nuts] UTR timescale draft spec

2011-08-06 Thread WB6BNQ
Hello Bernard, I can understand your feelings. My response was measured from the start of the subject matter, which, admittedly, was a different thread on this list. It did not start out well to say the least. Clearly, this matter is a touchy subject from another list with a history all its

Re: [time-nuts] Marrisons 1948 article

2011-08-06 Thread John Miles
-Original Message- From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts- boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of paul swed Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 5:45 PM To: Tijd Dingen; Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Marrisons 1948 article Indeed I am

Re: [time-nuts] UTR timescale draft spec

2011-08-06 Thread Magnus Danielson
On 06/08/11 04:00, Michael Sokolov wrote: Hello again, I have just written up the formal spec for the UTR timescale which I'm seeking to implement on my rubber duckie timekeeping apparatus which I had discussed here earlier this week, and I have released the first draft for review:

Re: [time-nuts] Marrisons 1948 article

2011-08-06 Thread Tijd Dingen
John Miles jmi...@pop.net wrote: None of the articles appear to be text-searchable, unfortunately, so that'll take a few kilowatt-hours of CPU time to fix. On that subject, what do you use for that? Personally I do something like this: - pdftohtml - index the html pages with mnogosearch -

Re: [time-nuts] Marrisons 1948 article

2011-08-06 Thread Brooke Clarke
Hi: I've added bookmarks to the Marrisons 1948 article and rotated some pages so they read correctly on screen. All the figures are in the bookmarks. Next internal links to the footnotes and figures. I find bookmarks much more useful than searching, but can add that too. Maybe a table of

Re: [time-nuts] Marrisons 1948 article

2011-08-06 Thread John Miles
On that subject, what do you use for that? Personally I do something like this: - pdftohtml - index the html pages with mnogosearch - dump on server - the pdf's are now searchable through a web interface (and from command line obviously) This works fine for pdf's that have embedded

[time-nuts] HP 5065 Patek Philippe Clock

2011-08-06 Thread EWKehren
With my ongoing effort to downsize I have heavy heartedly decided to get rid of the Patek Phiippe clock out of a HP 5065 that I never installed in an other project. Any one interested please contact me off list. Thank you Bert ___ time-nuts mailing

Re: [time-nuts] UTR timescale draft spec

2011-08-06 Thread Michael Sokolov
Magnus Danielson mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org wrote: The present specification outlines a low cost method for obtaining a low cost method is a potential goal, skip statement here. IOW, you are suggesting that the line in question read The present specification outlines a method for obtaining

Re: [time-nuts] Marrisons 1948 article

2011-08-06 Thread paul swed
John since I had actual books I downloaded the items of interest for reading on trips. If thats even possible these days. But far more interesting is if you have the repository complete and are working on indexing thats really great. They are good reads, if you want to understand how we got from

[time-nuts] Free to good home.....

2011-08-06 Thread Brian, WA1ZMS
Cleaning out my storage area. I have a know dead HP 05060-6090 CBT. SN: 1506A2030. Failure is hard and is one of the heating wires. Failed due to mechanical shock it seems. Was dead when I bought lot of equipment years ago. It's free to a good home as display but it's heavy and would like to

Re: [time-nuts] UTR timescale draft spec

2011-08-06 Thread Magnus Danielson
On 06/08/11 17:36, Michael Sokolov wrote: Magnus Danielsonmag...@rubidium.dyndns.org wrote: The present specification outlines a low cost method for obtaining a low cost method is a potential goal, skip statement here. IOW, you are suggesting that the line in question read The present

Re: [time-nuts] Free to good home.....FOUND A HOME

2011-08-06 Thread Brian, WA1ZMS
The CBT has found a new home. -Brian, WA1ZMS On Aug 6, 2011, at 12:03 PM, Brian, WA1ZMS wa1...@att.net wrote: Cleaning out my storage area. I have a know dead HP 05060-6090 CBT. SN: 1506A2030. Failure is hard and is one of the heating wires. Failed due to mechanical shock it seems. Was

Re: [time-nuts] UTR timescale draft spec

2011-08-06 Thread Michael Sokolov
Magnus Danielson mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org wrote: You just got better wordings here. scalar and mononously are the key things, then say that. OK, I'm not a mathematics major, but aren't scalar and real number two different terms for the same thing? I admit to not knowing whether complex

Re: [time-nuts] HP 5065 Patek Philippe Clock

2011-08-06 Thread dlewis6767
Yes, pls, ...how much to send to Austin, TX -Original Message- From: ewkeh...@aol.com Sent: Saturday, August 06, 2011 9:30 AM To: time-nuts@febo.com Subject: [time-nuts] HP 5065 Patek Philippe Clock With my ongoing effort to downsize I have heavy heartedly decided to get rid

Re: [time-nuts] Free to good home.....

2011-08-06 Thread dlewis6767
Yes, pls, ...how much to send to Austin, ...TX. I might want it. -Original Message- From: Brian, WA1ZMS Sent: Saturday, August 06, 2011 11:03 AM To: Time Nuts Subject: [time-nuts] Free to good home. Cleaning out my storage area. I have a know dead HP 05060-6090 CBT. SN:

[time-nuts] IEEE 1588 Clock and Packet Timestamper

2011-08-06 Thread Will Matney
Just received this notice from Maxim. The MAX24288 is a flexible, low-cost IEEE 1588 clock and timestamper with an SGMII or 1000BASE-X serial interface and a parallel MII interface that can be configured for GMII, RGMII, or 10/100 MII. The device provides all required hardware support for

Re: [time-nuts] Weird TEC data

2011-08-06 Thread Hal Murray
new...@cei.net said: The general shape and bumps in the plots track nicely, but I'm wondering why there's so many cycles difference after 36 hours. How are you collecting the data? What's the time between samples? One possibility is that one system is picking up extra clock ticks. If your

Re: [time-nuts] Weird TEC data

2011-08-06 Thread Scott Newell
At 07:13 PM 8/6/2011, Hal Murray wrote: new...@cei.net said: The general shape and bumps in the plots track nicely, but I'm wondering why there's so many cycles difference after 36 hours. How are you collecting the data? What's the time between samples? First off, your TEC data was an

Re: [time-nuts] Free to good home.....

2011-08-06 Thread wa1zms
I'm sorry. Somebody else beat you to it. :-( Thank you, however. -Brian, WA1ZMS -Original Message- From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com]On Behalf Of dlewis6767 Sent: Saturday, August 06, 2011 5:53 PM To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement

[time-nuts] Better TEC data (MJD 55779)

2011-08-06 Thread Scott Newell
Cumulative error, starting at MJD 55779 (difference scaled by 100 and smoothed): http://n5tnl.com/tec/55779/55779.png Frequency error, 3600 s intervals: http://n5tnl.com/tec/55779/55779_3600.png Frequency error, 600 s intervals: http://n5tnl.com/tec/55779/55779_600.png Frequency error, 60 s

Re: [time-nuts] Better TEC data (MJD 55779)

2011-08-06 Thread Scott Newell
Added recent snapshots of the live graphs: http://n5tnl.com/tec/55779/sparc/sparc.htm http://n5tnl.com/tec/55779/tock/tock.htm These are in localtime (CDT), not UTC. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to