The mountain thing has been done.
Someone needs to take their
clock to the bottom of the deepest mine (2.4 miles).
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and
Another thing to consider is the gravity anomaly caused by that hunk of granite
beneath your clock (or above it in a mine). Hmmm, what is the clock shift at
the top of Mt Everest that is due to the mountain and not the altitude?
Hal,
Right. The orbits are nominally circular -- but not exactly. The set of orbital
parameters cover these details. A quick google search suggests the eccentricity
for GPS is around 0.01. Still, that's enough to cause +/- 23 ns of accumulated
phase error per orbit. I'm pretty sure the
Mark,
Gravity mapping is a highly developed technology. Not just Everest, but the
whole planet:
http://op.gfz-potsdam.de/grace/results/grav/g001_eigen-grace01s.html
http://www.geology.sdsu.edu/kmlgeology/kmz/gravity_grace/grace.jpg
Or use this search and enjoy every image. It's just stunning:
It's not exactly a rigorous explanation, but I think it's a good memory aid.
Once you realize that c is a 4D constant rather than a scalar speed, you can
work out for yourself which way clock measurements are skewed from various
points of view.
-- john, KE5FX
> -Original Message-
>
On 11/29/15 12:13 PM, Mark Sims wrote:
Another thing to consider is the gravity anomaly caused by that hunk of granite
beneath your clock (or above it in a mine). Hmmm, what is the clock shift at
the top of Mt Everest that is due to the mountain and not the altitude?
Hi
> On Nov 29, 2015, at 3:15 PM, Hal Murray wrote:
>
>
> kb...@n1k.org said:
>> If you dig into the gravity stuff, they get into questions like “do we put
>> in a term for the gravitational effects of Pluto? Yes, there are Gravity
>> Nuts….
>
> Things like that
Hi
> On Nov 29, 2015, at 11:31 AM, Tom Van Baak wrote:
>
> Hal,
>
> Right. The orbits are nominally circular -- but not exactly. The set of
> orbital parameters cover these details. A quick google search suggests the
> eccentricity for GPS is around 0.01. Still, that's
Wow. So elegantly simple explanation, thanks John!
On November 27, 2015 2:54:51 PM CST, John Miles wrote:
>So, here's how I finally grokked this stuff. c, the speed of light in
>a vacuum, is often spoken of as a "speed limit" that nothing can ever
>exceed. That's a bad way to
The whole "t" thing was bothering me in John's explanation, so I
showed it to my son the physicist. He tells me that John's
explanation comes from Brian Greene's book, "The Elegant Universe"...
A very popular coffee table book, aimed at the same market as those
by Stephen Hawking.
Greene's
The reference was probably a bit too obscure for an international audience. :)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VPJqIT7a3qA
-- john, KE5FX
Miles Design LLC
> Hi John,
>
> Thank you very much for this explanation, I found it very "explicative".
> What I am not able to grasp is the sense of the
Yep, been there, done that... I own a Worden gravity meter.
Gravity mapping is a highly developed technology. Not just Everest, but the
whole planet:
___
time-nuts mailing list --
kb...@n1k.org said:
> If you dig into the gravity stuff, they get into questions like âdo we put
> in a term for the gravitational effects of Pluto? Yes, there are Gravity
> Nutsâ¦.
Things like that have a significant influence on planetary orbits. Do they
have a measurable influence on
t...@leapsecond.com said:
> I'm not sure I understand your elevation question. Are you talking about
> elevation as in mountain vs. sea level altitude? Or elevation as in
> satellite Az/El?
I was thinking of the elevation of the receiver as in mountain vs sea level.
I think the question I was
Hi John,
Thank you very much for this explanation, I found it very "explicative".
What I am not able to grasp is the sense of the phrase " That second
part was what really baked peoples' noodles". I think that is some
colloquial but not being English my native language I can't figure out
its
Chris,
A few years after my Mt Rainier trip I looked into doing the same experiment
down a mine. But besides having mountains Seattle also has the Pacific ocean so
there are any number of commercial and research deep sea operations around
here. I thought it would fun to put a few 5071A and
Am 29.11.2015 um 01:35 schrieb Poul-Henning Kamp:
I need to convert a 5MHz 0.2Vpp AC coupled sine signal to a 3.3V
CMOS compatible logic signal.
The "default" comparator based circuit either requires a negative
supply or 4 resitors for biasing the input and setting the zero level.
(The
hol...@hotmail.com said:
> The GPS spec implies the satellites have a fixed frequency offset to
> compensate for relativistic effects. But do they actually dynamically and/
> or individually adjust the frequency to adjust for orbit variations and
> eccentricities?
I wrote:
The LT1720** works on a 3.3v single supply, and has internal
hysteresis. Just ground one input, ground the other through a
resistor, and attach your AC-coupled signal (best if you can use
equal resistors to ground on the two inputs, but if the signal
termination is 50 ohms the
>From the data sheet it looks like a megohm range bias resistor is needed (X1
>to X2) as well as the blocking / coupling cap.
Robert LaJeunesse
> Sent: Sunday, November 29, 2015 at 5:15 PM
> From: "Cash Olsen"
> To: time-nuts@febo.com
> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Need
How about a part like a:
SN74LVC1GX04DCKR IC CRYSTAL OSC DRIVER SC70-6
With a DC blocking capacitor the part should be self-biasing and give logic
outputs.
--
S. Cash Olsen KD5SSJ
ARRL Technical Specialist
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 7:35 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp
wrote:
> I need
Hello Time-Nuts,
As threatened in earlier postings I can now show some results gathered with the
ACAM GP22 TDC chip and evaluation board. Admittedly this is only from its
"range 1" at the moment.
The setup was suitably simple to match my almost non-existent level of
expertise and available
22 matches
Mail list logo