Jim,
3) Input and output level (?)
the oscillator is a HCMOS output, so figure swinging about 3.5V
Any multiplier configuration will produce lots of different harmonics, and will
need fairly serious filtering after it if you want a clean 100MHz.
If you have a 20MHz oscillator with
On Oct 22, 2015, at 3:40 AM, Gerhard Hoffmann wrote:
I'd like to design a unified VCXO Carrier Board to these requirements:
1. It can host one of the the following VCXOs:
1.1. HP 10811A-6111 (as from 5370A)
1.2 Morion MV89A
1.3 MTI 260
1.4 CV-950
1.5 Timetech
1.6 Axtal
It might be worth looking at Holzworth. They make a range of single and multi
channel synthesisers covering different levels of phase noise and switching
speed.
http://www.holzworth.com/
Regards,
Garry
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 10:02:55 -0700
From: Jim Lux jim...@earthlink.net
To: Discussion of
Scott,
It doesn't look like AT-cut. AT-cut oven crystals are run at their upper
turnover point, which is a minimum, so the frequency starts high from power up
at normal room temperature.
With SC-cut, the f/T curve is shifted to the right and they are operated at
their lower turnover point (a
InGaP MMICs that
are designed for voltage biasing. Noise from their internal bias circuitry
seems to get on to the signal, and the NF started to increase well below
compression. Mini-Circuits' GVA- series may well be similar, as they are also
voltage-biased.
Garry Thorp
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 10
if Cbyp is fitted (any
value), but increasing the output capacitor to 100uF brings the peak down to
~30nV/rtHz.
Garry Thorp
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
. As the normalised close-in phase noise of 100MHz OCXOs
is considerably higher than that achieved by the best 5-10MHz oscillators, I
don't believe the mixer's flicker noise should be significant.
Garry Thorp
I have been using an minicircuits mixer as a phase detector for measuring low
frequency(5-10MHz
But since I happen to have access to much more stable frequencies than
voltages, I thought of a different way:
1. Mount a X-tal-osc with really lousy tempco inside the enclosure
2. Compare its output to a stable reference frequency.
3. Use the output of the phase comparator to drive the
Bruce wrote:
A little more detail is required such as:
1) What was the divided down output of the 74AC163 compared with?
The E5052B contains 2 uncorrelated test systems, and uses its 2 internal
synthesisers (with separate 10MHz ref OCXOs) as references. The signal
under test is split at the
Hello John,
Your results look very interesting. The big variation with input level
shows how important it is to get that right. Incidentally, I didn't
blame the CMOS for the 1/f^3 slope, as that was 18dB below the OCXO's
phase noise. The divider output dominated from ~100Hz outwards, and
showed
With the 723, you can make the reference noise as low as you want, by
heavy RC filtering. This applies whether you use its own reference or a
better external reference.
The 723 also seems to work quite happily with a feedback capacitor from
the output to the inverting input, reducing the AC gain
Hello Bob,
My 15mA estimate for the output stage was based on AC coupling the
output, which is how I connected it. The IC is then sourcing 25mA into
100R for half the time and sinking 25mA the rest of the time, so the
mean supply current drawn is 12.5mA. The extra is to allow for the IC's
Hello Clay,
Joining in this discussion at a rather late stage - have you
considered using 74AC series gates as buffers? They provide reasonable
isolation and have surprisingly low phase noise.
A single 74AC04 inverter gives over 40dB reverse isolation at 10MHz, so
3 cascaded gates would give
13 matches
Mail list logo