Steve Rooke wrote:
I think the reluctance to publish at
component level is the concern that it will be set upon by a bunch of
rabid dogs each saying pointing out errors in the design or
suggestions of how it could be done much better.
A guy has to decide who his audience is.
If you are
to the performance level of either one. The 10811 is
probably the easiest thing to both identify and find. You see them selling anywhere from
$100 to $200 depending on just how patient you are.
Bob
On May 2, 2010, at 4:13 PM, ch...@yipyap.com wrote:
Bob asks a reasonable question:
What kind of accuracy
just for show-and-tell:
I've been disassembling the Schmomandl ND100M oscillator
block to see if I could use it. I figured, it's the bird
in hand, and once was a high quality piece of equipment
so maybe...
The physical construction is great. Lots of fine pitch
slot head machine screws. Lots
sorry, revised with correct URL's.
ch...@yipyap.com wrote:
just for show-and-tell:
I've been disassembling the Schmomandl ND100M oscillator
block to see if I could use it. I figured, it's the bird
in hand, and once was a high quality piece of equipment
so maybe...
The physical construction
That is a really cool picture.
Can I be like you when I grow up?
I've figured out which of these silvered modules
in this Schomandl sig gen is the oscillator (the one that
got warm). I have to figure out if it is voltage adjustable
in some way.
Does anyone use mechanical adjustment with a
Bob asks a reasonable question:
What kind of accuracy are you trying to obtain?
Bob
I would like to end up with something that is usable
on a home electronics workbench. Something like a
Z3801. Something I can use if I ever try to do some
goofing around with microwave radio operation.
I'd like to build a GPS disciplined frequency standard.
I am slowly gathering up pieces.
I have a Trimble Resolution T GPS card that appears to work,
and an antenna for it.
I'm thinking now of the oscillator part.
I have two Racal 1992 counters with the stable oscillator option
(probably
