Re: [time-nuts] Best reason

2012-03-29 Thread Sanjeev Gupta
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 08:43, Hal Murray hmur...@megapathdsl.net wrote: I think of GPS as a bunch of satellites broadcasting I'm Bob, my orbit parameters are XXX, my clock says YYY. If you hear 4 of those, you have 4 equations to work out 4 unknowns. The unknowns are your position: X, Y,

Re: [time-nuts] Best reason

2012-03-29 Thread David C. Partridge
I'm currently have to convince management that our 6-1/2 DMM (0.01% uncertainty) can't be used to test the 0.1ppm DC Source that we're repairing. Don't bother, just send it to me (once you've fixed it natch) :) On a more serious note what it this DC source that can manage 0.1ppm - the only

Re: [time-nuts] Best reason

2012-03-29 Thread Azelio Boriani
Yes, and moreover: what kind of test can be done on that DC source if no DMM is able to show that accuracy? On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 9:53 AM, David C. Partridge david.partri...@perdrix.co.uk wrote: I'm currently have to convince management that our 6-1/2 DMM (0.01% uncertainty) can't be used

Re: [time-nuts] Best reason

2012-03-29 Thread Tom Knox
by a professional hand model in the Leapsecond site. Thomas Knox Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 21:20:14 +0200 From: att...@kinali.ch To: n1...@alum.dartmouth.org; time-nuts@febo.com Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Best reason On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 13:42:39 -0400 David McGaw n1...@alum.dartmouth.org wrote

[time-nuts] Best reason

2012-03-28 Thread Jim Palfreyman
So when a member of the general public says: Why do we need really accurate clocks? What is your answer? Personally I explain that accurate clocks enable you to pack a higher data rate into your smart phone. They like that. Any other thoughts? Jim

Re: [time-nuts] Best reason

2012-03-28 Thread Attila Kinali
On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 19:28:20 +1100 Jim Palfreyman jim77...@gmail.com wrote: Why do we need really accurate clocks? Accurate clocks are expensive. The more money the US war machine spends for accurate clocks, the less money they have to build weapons. Attila Kinali --

Re: [time-nuts] Best reason

2012-03-28 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message calh-g5ygw4etqguifmo5czv1pxp3vhdhoyz9em6oa9_mvb4...@mail.gmail.com , Jim Palfreyman writes: So when a member of the general public says: Why do we need really accurate clocks? What is your answer? Because accurate clocks is the central technology that makes GPS, mobile phones and the

Re: [time-nuts] Best reason

2012-03-28 Thread Hal Murray
Why do we need really accurate clocks? Time or frequency? p...@phk.freebsd.dk said: Because accurate clocks is the central technology that makes GPS, mobile phones and the internet work. What part of the internet depends upon accurate clocks? Ethernet, for example, requires roughly similar

Re: [time-nuts] Best reason

2012-03-28 Thread Jim Lux
On 3/28/12 1:28 AM, Jim Palfreyman wrote: So when a member of the general public says: Why do we need really accurate clocks? What is your answer? Personally I explain that accurate clocks enable you to pack a higher data rate into your smart phone. They like that. But I don't know that

Re: [time-nuts] Best reason

2012-03-28 Thread Azelio Boriani
Usually (and unfortunately) governments tend to gather more money from tax rather than giving up something (Italy docet). On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Attila Kinali att...@kinali.ch wrote: On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 19:28:20 +1100 Jim Palfreyman jim77...@gmail.com wrote: Why do we need really

Re: [time-nuts] Best reason

2012-03-28 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message 20120328113122.5c868800...@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net, Hal Mu rray writes: Because accurate clocks is the central technology that makes GPS, mobile phones and the internet work. What part of the internet depends upon accurate clocks? SONET at the bottom and eBay endings at

Re: [time-nuts] Best reason

2012-03-28 Thread Jim Lux
On 3/28/12 1:28 AM, Jim Palfreyman wrote: So when a member of the general public says: Why do we need really accurate clocks? Not necessarily at time-nuts performance, but here's some clock and clock distribution applications There are a lot of systems out there that timestamp something

Re: [time-nuts] Best reason

2012-03-28 Thread Michael Batchelor
Well the best reason is that by our social convention it makes people comfortable. But that reason does have much logic behind it. ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to

Re: [time-nuts] Best reason

2012-03-28 Thread J. Forster
There are good technical reasons for having very accurate standards of time interval, but IMO, far fewer reasons for ns or even ms accuracy in time of day. Most everyday things, except possibly eBay and some financial transactions, really don't have to happen exactly on the dot. As to having

Re: [time-nuts] Best reason

2012-03-28 Thread iov...@inwind.it
batchelo...@yahoo.com wrote Well the best reason is that by our social convention it makes people comfortable. But that reason does have much logic behind it. One month ago a 38-year old wristwatch resurfaced from a junk box and I decided to return to it at least temporarily. It drifts some

Re: [time-nuts] Best reason

2012-03-28 Thread David McGaw
Mechanical wristwatches are capable of good precision. I have an inexpensive 40-year old Caravelle (Bulova) that with reasonable adjustment can still keep to a few seconds per day. I never have considered quartz watches to be better unless they can be adjusted, which most cannot. David On

Re: [time-nuts] Best reason

2012-03-28 Thread Chris Albertson
Two good reasons: (1) Many uses in science and engineering. Mostly indirectly, you need a good frequency standard to calibrate some instrument so you can measure something. Thinks like distance, current, capacitance are based on time if you follow the chain long enough.As frequencies get

Re: [time-nuts] Best reason

2012-03-28 Thread Mike S
On 3/28/2012 1:42 PM, David McGaw wrote: I never have considered quartz watches to be better unless they can be adjusted, which most cannot. Most decent ones can be. I've got some Citizens and Seikos, which have a small trimmer cap you can adjust. There's usually a test point nearby with a

Re: [time-nuts] Best reason

2012-03-28 Thread michael batchelor
Antonio I8IOV wrote: I wrote: Well the best reason is that by our social convention it makes people comfortable. But that reason does have much logic behind it. One month ago a 38-year old wristwatch resurfaced from a junk box and I decided to return to it at least temporarily. It drifts

Re: [time-nuts] Best reason

2012-03-28 Thread Michael Blazer
1 nanosecond = 1 foot, do you know where you are? Remember, wherever you go, there you are. Buckaroo Banzai On 3/28/2012 3:28 AM, Jim Palfreyman wrote: So when a member of the general public says: Why do we need really accurate clocks? What is your answer? Personally I explain that

Re: [time-nuts] Best reason

2012-03-28 Thread Hal Murray
jim77...@gmail.com said: So when a member of the general public says: Why do we need really accurate clocks? What is your answer? Personally I explain that accurate clocks enable you to pack a higher data rate into your smart phone. They like that. Any other thoughts? Navigation? It goes

Re: [time-nuts] Best reason

2012-03-28 Thread Chris Stake
jim77...@gmail.com said: So when a member of the general public says: Why do we need really accurate clocks? What is your answer? The alternative is inaccurate clocks, would that ever be preferable? ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To

Re: [time-nuts] Best reason

2012-03-28 Thread Chris Dawes
:31 PM To: 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement' Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Best reason jim77...@gmail.com said: So when a member of the general public says: Why do we need really accurate clocks? What is your answer? The alternative is inaccurate clocks, would that ever be preferable

Re: [time-nuts] Best reason

2012-03-28 Thread Randall Prentice
...@febo.com] On Behalf Of Chris Dawes Sent: Thursday, 29 March 2012 2:41 p.m. To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Best reason Hi All, Thanks Jim P for the thread. I was lurking hoping for some amazing idea that would help me explain (in simple

Re: [time-nuts] Best reason

2012-03-28 Thread Michael Blazer
Just remember, to the 'average' person (no such exists in reality), all technology is magic. The TV remote is a magic wand that you wave at the TV and recite the proper incantation (sometimes profane). You chant the spell to your smart phone and you can talk to your friend anywhere in the

Re: [time-nuts] Best reason

2012-03-28 Thread michael batchelor
jim77...@gmail.com said: So when a member of the general public says: Why do we need really accurate clocks? What is your answer? The alternative is inaccurate clocks, would that ever be preferable? Wouldn't that depend on how late for work you were?