Re: [time-nuts] New timing receivers?

2014-05-06 Thread mike cook
A couple of points I discovered while building these things. This morning I got an Adafruit Ultimate (MTK3999) and a uBlox neo-6M module. The first thing I discovered after looking at the specs , was that both have on board LDO 3.3V regulators, so you can feed them 5V without harm. I had

[time-nuts] New timing receivers?

2014-05-06 Thread Mark Sims
I have done a PCB that has connectors/mounting holes for the Adafruit, Crius CN06 (uBlox Neo 6M), and Resolution-T and -SMD receivers. It has a DB9, 3.3V regulator, and MAX232A chip. It can drive the 1PPS signal (either polarity) to the CD signal on the DB9. Power to the circuitry can be

Re: [time-nuts] New timing receivers?

2014-05-05 Thread Bob Stewart
, 2014 1:56 PM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] New timing receivers? I don't see that behavior.  Looking at ~24 hours of data I have 1,024 unique (x,y) coordinates (as reported by the GGA sentence).  The standard deviation of the error relative to the median (x,y) position is 1.2 meters. Paul, I

Re: [time-nuts] New timing receivers?

2014-04-29 Thread Attila Kinali
On Sun, 27 Apr 2014 20:43:44 -0700 Hal Murray hmur...@megapathdsl.net wrote: The uBlox-6 has a free running osc. If it wasn't free running, it would be a GPSDO. Their new LEA-M8F seems to be a GPSDO. The 30.72MHz output frequency suggests the intended use in cell phone base stations.

Re: [time-nuts] New timing receivers?

2014-04-28 Thread Bob Camp
To: time-nuts time-nuts@febo.com Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2014 8:05 PM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] New timing receivers? I spent some time reading the uBlox-6 documentation. I found the TIM-TP ubx message and format. I see that there is also the ability to feed back to the uBlox-6 time shift info

Re: [time-nuts] New timing receivers?

2014-04-28 Thread Charles Steinmetz
Bob wrote: It's been a few years since I played with the TBolt delay. At least on the one I messed with, it only did modulo 100 ns moves. Anything finer grained than 100 ns simply was ignored. That is true of the jam synch (used when the current PPS timing is off by more than 50ns,

Re: [time-nuts] New timing receivers?

2014-04-28 Thread Paul
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 1:08 AM, Mark Sims hol...@hotmail.com wrote: I was playing with an Adafruit GPS, it appeared that if it thought you were not moving it would go into a pseudo-position-hold mode and the output coords would not change. I don't see that behavior. Looking at ~24 hours

Re: [time-nuts] New timing receivers?

2014-04-28 Thread Tom Van Baak
I don't see that behavior. Looking at ~24 hours of data I have 1,024 unique (x,y) coordinates (as reported by the GGA sentence). The standard deviation of the error relative to the median (x,y) position is 1.2 meters. Paul, I agree. I have 30 days of Adafruit data; the position is never

Re: [time-nuts] New timing receivers?

2014-04-28 Thread Jim Harman
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 1:08 AM, Mark Sims hol...@hotmail.com wrote: When I was playing with an Adafruit GPS, it appeared that if it thought you were not moving it would go into a pseudo-position-hold mode and the output coords would not change. It took it a while to start outputting new

Re: [time-nuts] New timing receivers?

2014-04-27 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message CAKyJ6kZqOiByDU_CwkZpPiuvzigGh+mqe4O=dpwzz4wo9gr...@mail.gmail.com , Paul writes: Sawtooth (quantization) correction is probably the defining characteristic. Position Hold is what makes a GPS receiver timing, the sawtooth correction is icing on the cake. -- Poul-Henning Kamp

Re: [time-nuts] New timing receivers?

2014-04-27 Thread Attila Kinali
On Sat, 26 Apr 2014 22:36:27 -0700 Chris Albertson albertson.ch...@gmail.com wrote: How does the u-bloc's performance compare to the M12+T?One of these is on my list of things to buy someday. I thought the M12+T had a 1-sigma error in the single digit nanoseconds.The u-bloc is newer

Re: [time-nuts] New timing receivers?

2014-04-27 Thread Bob Camp
Hi You might want to actually measure the GPS modules to look at their performance. Some of them (like the uBlox) can do much better than the published specs. Bob On Apr 27, 2014, at 4:25 AM, Attila Kinali att...@kinali.ch wrote: On Sat, 26 Apr 2014 22:36:27 -0700 Chris Albertson

Re: [time-nuts] New timing receivers?

2014-04-27 Thread Tom Van Baak
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2014 10:36 PM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] New timing receivers? How does the u-bloc's performance compare to the M12+T?One of these is on my list of things to buy someday. I thought the M12+T

Re: [time-nuts] New timing receivers?

2014-04-27 Thread Bob Camp
to pay the higher price, then check out the ublox-6T. /tvb - Original Message - From: Chris Albertson albertson.ch...@gmail.com To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2014 10:36 PM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] New timing

Re: [time-nuts] New timing receivers?

2014-04-27 Thread W2GPS
W2GPS -Original Message- From: Tom Van Baak [mailto:t...@leapsecond.com] Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2014 9:45 AM To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement Subject: Re: [time-nuts] New timing receivers? For a nice comparison of the M12+T, M12M, and ublox-6T, start with page 34

Re: [time-nuts] New timing receivers?

2014-04-27 Thread Tom Van Baak
...@cnssys.com To: 'Tom Van Baak' t...@leapsecond.com; 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement' time-nuts@febo.com Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2014 1:10 PM Subject: RE: [time-nuts] New timing receivers? Tom, There is an important error in your message below. The Motorola designed M12M receiver

Re: [time-nuts] New timing receivers?

2014-04-27 Thread W2GPS
: W2GPS Subject: Re: [time-nuts] New timing receivers? Hi Rick, Thanks very much for the correction, and for the additional information. Glad to hear the M12M is still around. That's good news for all of us. But then can you explain what you meant in your PTTI paper when you said: Anticipating

Re: [time-nuts] New timing receivers?

2014-04-27 Thread Jim Miller
I spent some time reading the uBlox-6 documentation. I found the TIM-TP ubx message and format. I see that there is also the ability to feed back to the uBlox-6 time shift info for the PPS in 1ns increments. Does it make sense to feed the TIM-TP info back this way to provide correction? Or is an

Re: [time-nuts] New timing receivers?

2014-04-27 Thread Tom Van Baak
...@jtmiller.com To: time-nuts time-nuts@febo.com Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2014 8:05 PM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] New timing receivers? I spent some time reading the uBlox-6 documentation. I found the TIM-TP ubx message and format. I see that there is also the ability to feed back to the uBlox-6 time

Re: [time-nuts] New timing receivers?

2014-04-27 Thread Paul
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 2:14 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp p...@phk.freebsd.dkwrote Position Hold is what makes a GPS receiver timing, the sawtooth correction is icing on the cake. I've been curious about this for a while: SkyNav says the SKG16 (based on the MT3329) has a timing accuracy of 60ns

Re: [time-nuts] New timing receivers?

2014-04-27 Thread Hal Murray
j...@jtmiller.com said: I spent some time reading the uBlox-6 documentation. I found the TIM-TP ubx message and format. I see that there is also the ability to feed back to the uBlox-6 time shift info for the PPS in 1ns increments. Does it make sense to feed the TIM-TP info back this way to

[time-nuts] New timing receivers?

2014-04-27 Thread Mark Sims
When I was playing with an Adafruit GPS, it appeared that if it thought you were not moving it would go into a pseudo-position-hold mode and the output coords would not change. It took it a while to start outputting new coords when you started moving again. This test was at walking speeds.

[time-nuts] New timing receivers?

2014-04-26 Thread Jim Miller
I'm reading though the manual for my recently acquired M12+T which I'm looking forward to using. I notice that the manual is dated 09FEB05. So the M12+T has been around for about a decade. Are there more recent timing receivers available now or has the ubiquity of the consumer GPS market

Re: [time-nuts] New timing receivers?

2014-04-26 Thread Bob Camp
Hi There are a number of timing receivers on the market. They still are a very small percentage of the total units sold. A lot of people play with the uBlox parts. Bob On Apr 26, 2014, at 7:59 PM, Jim Miller j...@jtmiller.com wrote: I'm reading though the manual for my recently acquired

Re: [time-nuts] New timing receivers?

2014-04-26 Thread Shane Morris
Have a look for Navsync CW12-TIM. We'll be using these for various timing applications including a simulcast radio repeater system over IP. They're about US$89 from SemiconductorStore.com. Many thanks! On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Jim Miller j...@jtmiller.com wrote: I'm reading though the

Re: [time-nuts] New timing receivers?

2014-04-26 Thread Bob Stewart
...@rtty.us To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2014 7:27 PM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] New timing receivers? Hi There are a number of timing receivers on the market. They still are a very small percentage of the total units sold. A lot

Re: [time-nuts] New timing receivers?

2014-04-26 Thread Bob Camp
...@rtty.us To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2014 7:27 PM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] New timing receivers? Hi There are a number of timing receivers on the market. They still are a very small percentage of the total

Re: [time-nuts] New timing receivers?

2014-04-26 Thread EWKehren
And quite a few companies use them. In a message dated 4/26/2014 8:27:57 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, li...@rtty.us writes: Hi There are a number of timing receivers on the market. They still are a very small percentage of the total units sold. A lot of people play with the uBlox parts.

Re: [time-nuts] New timing receivers?

2014-04-26 Thread Paul
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Jim Miller j...@jtmiller.com wrote: Are there more recent timing receivers available now Yes. Google gps timing receiver for a start. Sawtooth (quantization) correction is probably the defining characteristic. So even though u-Blox makes 'T' versions (e.g.

Re: [time-nuts] New timing receivers?

2014-04-26 Thread Chris Albertson
How does the u-bloc's performance compare to the M12+T?One of these is on my list of things to buy someday. I thought the M12+T had a 1-sigma error in the single digit nanoseconds.The u-bloc is newer it is even better? On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 6:02 PM, Paul tic-...@bodosom.net wrote:

Re: [time-nuts] new timing receivers

2006-04-26 Thread bg
On Wed, April 26, 2006 21:30, Brooke Clarke said: Hi: Does anyone know about the new u-blox LEA-4T Timing GPS receiver and time stamp? http://www.u-blox.com/products/lea_4t.html I have not seen any reviews on the resolution-T derivates that are relative new. Trimble have a new Acutime