Note also that, based on my limited experience, most
commercial mixer implementations use a much faster
beat note: 10, 100 Hz, even 1 kHz. A faster beat note
may help your concern #1 above, and #2 below.
Ulrich,
One thing I forgot to mention earlier -- there is another
advantage in using a
Hello Paul-Henning,
www.tmo.jpl.nasa.gov/progress_report/42-121/121G.pdf
definitely uses no FFT but uses a theoreme from geometry to estimate the
signal's frequency and the rest is a two dimensional non-linear fit for
amplitude and phase. But i am starting to understand how a FFT might be
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ulrich Bangert writes:
Hello Paul-Henning,
www.tmo.jpl.nasa.gov/progress_report/42-121/121G.pdf
definitely uses no FFT but uses a theoreme from geometry to estimate the
signal's frequency and the rest is a two dimensional non-linear fit for
amplitude and phase. But
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ulrich Bangert writes:
Hello Paul-Henning,
www.tmo.jpl.nasa.gov/progress_report/42-121/121G.pdf
definitely uses no FFT but uses a theoreme from geometry to estimate the
signal's frequency and the rest is a two dimensional non-linear
