All,
Okay, those two parts worked! The 5V reference plus replacing that opamp
repaired the unit to working. Amazing accuracy when my counter is at a 10sec
gate (off by all of 0.5hz, which is well within my uncertainty of my
counter (Racal-Dana 1992)). Also of interest is the unit went from
All,
Just to answer my own question:
The output (Pin 6) of U15 (LT1021DCS8-5) goes to what looks like R83 (that
whole section has a lot of confusing labeling), then to Pin 3 of U17 (LT1014),
which is the positive input of the A amplifier. That then comes out of Pin 1
(A’s output), and goes
Hi Charles (et al),
So, I did see that post, but I'm not entirely sure how it works. If I
understand, the FPGA is generating the 9.7khz clock (which I can see on the
test pad he indicated), running it through some logic to square it up, then a
low pass filter, then into the op-amp similar to
> Stewart Cobb described the operation of the DAC
> (actually, PWM) in a post on Nov 2, 2013
> ("Subject: [time-nuts] Thunderbolt tuning DAC
> theory of operation"). Check the list archive.
https://www.febo.com/pipermail/time-nuts/2013-November/081058.html
/tvb
Ryan wrote:
Also confusing is the quad op-amp seems to be
saturated at the negative rail. I can see this
Opamp feeds the adjust pin on the OCXO, but Im
not sure what feeds it. Guessing the FPGA? I
still cant find the DAC
all I see are these
pictures [ ] but the pictures arent of the
an Stasel"
<rsta...@uoregon.edu<mailto:rsta...@uoregon.edu><mailto:rsta...@uoregon.edu>>
To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement"
<time-nuts@febo.com<mailto:time-nuts@febo.com><mailto:time-nuts@febo.com>>
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Trimb
Well, if you think the 5V ref is bad, you could pull the ref chip and jumper
the logic 5V to its output pad (through a resistor... maybe 1K) to do a quick
and dirty test. If the resistor output is dragged down, you know something is
loading down the ref voltage.
to:rsta...@uoregon.edu>>
To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement"
<time-nuts@febo.com<mailto:time-nuts@febo.com><mailto:time-nuts@febo.com>>
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Trimble Thunderbolt GPSDO Troubleshooting
Hi Bob,
I think I’m going
sel"
<rsta...@uoregon.edu<mailto:rsta...@uoregon.edu><mailto:rsta...@uoregon.edu>>
To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement"
<time-nuts@febo.com<mailto:time-nuts@febo.com><mailto:time-nuts@febo.com>>
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Tri
Stasel" <rsta...@uoregon.edu>
> To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement"
> <time-nuts@febo.com>
> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Trimble Thunderbolt GPSDO Troubleshooting
>
> Hi Bob,
>
> I think I’m going to take a look, since I co
Hi Bob,
I think I’m going to take a look, since I couldn’t find a spare, so I’ve got a
couple on order (and a few days to wait).
So, looking at the datasheet
(http://www.intersil.com/content/dam/Intersil/documents/icl2/icl232.pdf),
you’re saying check the two caps across pins 1 and 3, and 4
Personally I'd take a few minutes to look closer at the '232 chip with the
scope. Are the charge pump caps swinging 5V p-p and 10V p-p? if not swinging at
all, trash the chip. Is -V pin voltage about equal to the negative of the +V
pin? If so, that's OK. If not might have an output shorted, or
That 232 chip should run at near as damnit ambient so I'd say it's highly
likely to be dead.
Replacement should be a doddle
On 25 Mar 2016 19:02, "Ryan Stasel" wrote:
> All,
>
> I recently got an (obviously used) Trimble Thunderbolt (case says Rev B).
> Hooking it up to my
All,
I recently got an (obviously used) Trimble Thunderbolt (case says Rev B).
Hooking it up to my bench PS, I got the unit fired up, and the OCXO relatively
rapidly settled down to just over 26hz over 10Mhz (According to my Racal-Dana
1992, which I’ve found to be EXTREMELY accurate compared
14 matches
Mail list logo