Steve wrote:
I agree with what you say and really wish we could move forward
with this. The only thing that is preventing this happening is the
expected reaction that will occur when/if that information is ever
released. Unfortunately the concept of constructive criticism is an
anathema to some
Le 25/06/2010 06:40, Steve Rooke a écrit :
...snip...
Perhaps more like yourself would express the same sentiment publicly
here, that may be the encouragement that Warren needs to take that
plunge. So please speak up and add your support to Warren. Thank you.
I'll add my vote. If we had
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 16:02, mike cook mike.c...@orange.fr wrote:
Heaven forbid that I start more mud slinging, but I think that Bruce did
not take enough notice of Warrens assertion that his method was good
enough. There may be mathematical incompleteness in Warrens' implementation
and
oops.. thumbs instead of fingers
Le 25/06/2010 10:15, Sanjeev Gupta a écrit :
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 16:02, mike cookmike.c...@orange.fr wrote:
Heaven forbid that I start more mud slinging, but I think that Bruce did
not take enough notice of Warrens assertion that his method was good
Charles,
I find it hard to believe that an engineer with your obvious skills
would even need to question the fs issue or ask questions about it's
truth. Even the briefest glance at the block schematic shows that
there is a 100kHz filter in the loop which would limit the lock to
10us given that
OK, I'll give you that. But, how does it account for the rapid change in
slope, or the abrupt change for that matter? It doesn't look like an aging
crstal to me (maybe one with a problem that jumps in freq). For the most
part, there is no jumping DURING the slope, it seems to change on the
Charles Posted a bunch of stuff (below),
Most think I should just ignore him, but I can not help myself,
he has after all made this one just too easy and silly not to respond to.
I hope Charles did not consider this to be just another good example of
all the 'constructive helpful criticism'
Warren,
I couldn't care less whether your or any method works or not. I have no
vested interest or opinion whatsoever.
I can say however that in the short time I have been on this list I have
grown very tired of the way you hijack any thread that comes along.
Most people who think they
This is for the Uber-Timenerds
http://www.adafruit.com/blog/2010/06/24/multimeter-clock-styled-after-the-simpson-260-multimeter/
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
I am thinking about trying to measure the aging process over the coming
months, and then try to model and even predict future aging. If I can get
that to work, perhaps I can even incorporate the formula for predicted aging
right into my software. Any insights on this would be much
On 06/26/2010 04:33 AM, Tom Clifton wrote:
This is for the Uber-Timenerds
http://www.adafruit.com/blog/2010/06/24/multimeter-clock-styled-after-the-simpson-260-multimeter/
Notice that the design has a pun designed into it... the PIC delivers
current to the multimeters, so it can display
11 matches
Mail list logo
