On 2/29/24 23:17, grischka wrote:
On 29.02.2024 07:26, Herman ten Brugge via Tinycc-devel wrote:
Setting CONFIG_RUNMEM_RO=0 looks incorrect to me because it sets
write in executables.
Apple has implemented W^X (Writes can not occur in executables) for
security reasons.
This may also be
On 29.02.2024 07:26, Herman ten Brugge via Tinycc-devel wrote:
Setting CONFIG_RUNMEM_RO=0 looks incorrect to me because it sets write in
executables.
Apple has implemented W^X (Writes can not occur in executables) for security
reasons.
This may also be implemented in in future linux/bsd
Hi,
isn't there a garbage collecting done at the end to remove all the unused stuff
to produce a binary that contains only the necessary parts ?
Regards.
- Mail d'origine -
De: Eric Raible
À: tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
Envoyé: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 08:43:17 +0100 (CET)
Objet: [Tinycc-devel]
I cannot speak for Griska or the reasons why that change was committed.
But with respect to my mail from 2/25, once again, all I was doing was
hinting
that tcc could be configured to not call (the since reverted) unportable
APIs.
Anyway, from my point of view, a default of RO=1 is fine. But it
