Hi
I take Beth's point about not dwelling on the MDCM, but the MDCM degree IS the
MD degree. I think one thing causing some confusion is that in Canada the MD
is considered an undergraduate degree. See
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_degree
With respect to the critical thinkiing issue,
In spite of this morning's South Georgia billowing pollen storms that
are gold
plating my recovering lungs, I thought how lucky another day belongs to me.
How lucky I
am to have been so close to death and now to be able to so celebrate life.
With so many
things to complain about
On 22 Mar 2009 at 1:18, Jim Clark wrote:
I take Beth's point about not dwelling on the MDCM, but the MDCM degree IS
the MD degree. I think one thing causing some confusion is that in Canada
the MD is considered an undergraduate degree. See
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_degree
On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 13:36:51 -0400, Beth Benoit wrote:
Attached is an article sent to me by someone who also happens to sell water
purifiers. There is so much wrong with it (starting with the author's
alleged MD, which must be something other than the M.D. with which we're
familiar), and I
The article is here:
http://shop.snyderhealth.com/article_info.php?articles_id=6
Annette
Annette Kujawski Taylor, Ph.D.
Professor of Psychology
University of San Diego
5998 Alcala Park
San Diego, CA 92110
619-260-4006
tay...@sandiego.edu
Original message
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009
It sounds like distilled water could be the solution to global warming!
Joe
Joseph J. Horton Ph. D.
Box 3077
Grove City College
Grove City, PA 16127
724-458-2004
jjhor...@gcc.edu
In God we trust. All others must bring data.
-Original Message-
From: tay...@sandiego.edu
On 22 Mar 2009 at 11:14, tay...@sandiego.edu wrote:
The article is here:
http://shop.snyderhealth.com/article_info.php?articles_id=6
The claim that distilled water is dangerous to drink makes no sense on
theoretical grounds, and my PubMed search in my previous post showed that
the claim has
Hmmm. Seems all the good stuff happens when I'm not around.
(I wonder if that's a conspiracy...nah...can't be...I think)
Why is it important to know his beliefs?
Are we not supposed to hire people for positions without predjudice with
regard to religion, color, sexual orientation etc?
--Mike
Oh sure!
Now you're just substituting one authority (Dr. Rona) for another (Dr.
Schwarcz) And we don't even get to see his statements! Instead they are
relayed through a friend. Reminds me of that book (Urantia?)
I had a quick look at the article seemed fine to me (lol).
--Mike
On Sun, Mar 22,
When religious beliefs conflict with one's function as a science
minister they become relevant to job function.
Would you hire a Christian Scientist to direct a public health program?
One has a right to one's beliefs; one does not have a right to hold a
job that one refuses (for whatever
All authorities are not created equal.
There was a long thread discussing Dr. Rona's credentials, and
whether they had been misleadingly presented.
On Mar 22, 2009, at 10:57 PM, Michael Smith wrote:
Oh sure!
Now you're just substituting one authority (Dr. Rona) for another
(Dr. Schwarcz)
On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 11:14:52 -0700, Annette Taylor wrote:
The article is here:
http://shop.snyderhealth.com/article_info.php?articles_id=6
This is a curious article. Since it is geared towards a lay/popular
audience it doesn't use the traditional citation of sources and it is
unclear whether
On 22 Mar 2009 at 21:57, Michael Smith wrote:
Oh sure!
Now you're just substituting one authority(Dr. Rona) for another (Dr.
Schwarcz) And we don't even get to see his statements! Instead they are
relayed through a friend. Reminds me of that book (Urantia?)
You're right about the
13 matches
Mail list logo
