Actually, that's basically (note qualification) the way I grade
papers, and I suspect most of us. One factor is how good the
individual instructor is on identifying the key terms that they use!
Now, I have the option to follow up a specific red flag in ways that
might not be easily
On Fri, 8 Apr 2005, Christopher D. Green went:
Let the debate begin!
Dear students,
I feel that reading your essays is not worth my time. Now go home
and work hard.
--David Epstein
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email
Worse, how is the instructor to know how to teach without seeing how the
students (mis)understood the material?
Dear students,
As you know, my job is to stand here and say stuff. It's not my
responsibility to make sure that you understand any of it. If you didn't
understand it, the
At 2:47 PM -0400 4/8/05, David Epstein wrote:
On Fri, 8 Apr 2005, Christopher D. Green went:
Let the debate begin!
Dear students,
I feel that reading your essays is not worth my time. Now go home
and work hard.
But
The grading is based on criteria set by the instructor.
The choice is:
Would
Dear Students:
As you know, we have been studying the great strides recently made in
artificial intelligence. Computers are learning to speak, and many of you have
been much happier since your weekly sessions with Eliza.
To put into practice what we have been studying I will be grading half
Taylor, Ph. D. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 4:02 PM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences
Subject: RE: [Fwd: Essay-grading software]
Dear Students:
As you know, we have been studying the great strides recently made in
artificial intelligence. Computers are learning
I'm not so sure that this is very different from what a lot of us are
already doing. In my research methods class I have a graduate TA who
writes detailed comments on all of the student's practice papers. She is a
former student is very well trained in what I consider to be essential
in a good
